Evaluasi Pelayanan Kesehatan dan Pendidikan Program Keluarga Harapan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2017.012-10Keywords:
evaluation, conditional cash transfers, health, education.Abstract
This study seeks to a description the evaluation of health and education service of conditional cash transfers (Program Keluarga Harapan-PKH) based on an input, process, and output. It’s programme between 2016 until 2017 has been implemented in District of Jetis, Bantul. This paper demonstrates the results of the evaluation, though this results hoped input for the decision to programme repaired. This article, however, it seeks programme make good from health and education service component. Thus, I found Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT) or Progam Keluarga Harapan (PKH) programme have signed for even distribution of education and accessibility for health services on simply, particularly of pregnant wife and suckle. The importance of indicators at programme successfully, data validity has been doing of maximal. So, the candidate of participant didn’t perfunctorily in this programme. Hence, participatory of people (non-candidate) in this programme, also make good of indicators, which can be interdependent of control form another side. Eventually, the candidate of their programme, if not meet a demand just like the rule of manual books on 2016, they are can the punishment of exhortation, greeting, and defeasance of the programme. I also, however, found the weakness of tease enough, i.e. the beneficiary still considers that conditional cash transfer is only for a moment’s need, not thinking about long-term interests. In turn, the process of alleviating poverty is only 'patching the wound' rather than treating it to its problem needs.
Studi ini berupaya mengkaji tentang evaluasi layanan kesehatan dan pendidikan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) berbasis input, proses pelaksanaan, dan output pada program yang sudah berjalan di Kec. Jetis, Bantul, dari tahun 2016 hingga 2017. Tujuan evaluasi yang telah dikaji, harapannya menjadi masukan bagi penentu kebijakan (decission) untuk memperbaiki program. Tulisan ini juga melihat keberhasilan program dari komponen layanan pendidikan dan kesehatan. Saya menemukan bahwa program Conditional Cash Transfers (CTT) atau PKH memiliki signifikansi nyata dalam pemerataan pendidikan dan akses yang mudah pada layanan kesehatan, terutama bagi ibu hamil dan menyusui. Indikator penting dalam keberhasilan program ini, validitas data berjalan secara maksimal, sehingga tidak asal dalam menentukan peserta penerima bantuan. Bukti keterlibatan masyarakat (non-peserta) dalam program juga menjadi indikator keberhasilan, sehingga bisa saling mengawasi antara satu sama lain. Alhasil, peserta yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban seperti aturan dalam buku pedoman 2016, mereka akan mendapat punishment mulai dari peringatan, teguran hingga pembatalan program bantuan. Namun saya juga menemukan kelemahan yang cukup mengusik, yaitu penerima manfaat masih menganggap bahwa bantuan langsung tunai bersyarat ini hanya untuk keperluan sesaat, tidak berpikir untuk kepentingan jangka panjang. Pada gilirannya, proses pengentasan kemiskinan hanya bersifat ‘menambal luka’ bukan mengobati hingga ke akar masalahnya (based needs).
![](https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/dakwah/public/site/artikel.jpg)
![](https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/dakwah/public/site/galley.jpg)
References
Direktorat Jenderal Perlindungan dan Jaminan Sosial Kementerian Sosial RI. 2016. Pedoman Umum Program Keluarga Harapan. Jakarta: Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia.
Diyanto R. D., & Purnomo, E. (2015). “Evaluasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Pada Siswa SMP”, Jurnal Studi Sosial (3)3. http:// jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JSS/article/view/10348/7054.
Dunn, W. N. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Hikmat, H., & Saragih, T., (ed.). (2005). Panduan Umum Program Pemberdayaan Fakir Miskin. Jakarta: Departemen Sosial.
Huzaipa. (2014). “Evaluasi Kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan di Kecamatan Sigi Biromaru Kabupaten Sigi”, Katalogis (7)2: 158-169. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/Katalogis/article/ viewFile/6917/5557.
Mahmudi, I. (2011). “CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan”, Jurnal At-Ta’dib (6)1: 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib. v6i1.551.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Morris, T. (2006). Social Work Research Methods Four Alternative Paradigms. USA: California University Press.
Rosfadhila, M. (2013). “Kajian Pelaksanaan Program Bantuan Langsung Tunai (BLT) 2008 dan Evaluasi Penerima Program BLT 2005 di Indonesia”. Jakarta: Smeru. http://www.smeru.or.id/id/content/ kajian-pelaksanaan-program-bantuan-langsung-tunai-blt-2008dan-evaluasi-penerima-program-blt.
Stuflebeam, D. L., & Anthony, J. S. (1986). Systematic Evaluation: A SelfInstructional Guide to Theory and Practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Suharto, E. (2013). Kebijakan Sosial Sebagai Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wiersma, W. (2009). “Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications”. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation (6)11: 109-111. http:// journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/197.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
(1) The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.(2) Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
(3) The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions.
(4) The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site.