Toleransi Tanpa Batas: Outlook Agamawan dan Kebijakan Migrasi Suku Batak Kristen ke Pedalaman Duri Bengkalis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2019.031-01Keywords:
migration, harmony, tolerance, pluralism, preaching message.Abstract
This study explores the concept of policy that needs to be implemented by the government in counteracting of religious intolerance. Based on the factors of population equality and economic prosperity, the government must be regarding the socio-religious aspect of the migration program in the interior of Duri Bengkalis, Riau. In order to realize the ideals of national social development, the portrait of the process of migrating Christian Bataks’ to the interior of Duri must be an outlook for the social conflicts that occur. Highlighting the case of intolerance between Christian Bataks’ and Malay Muslim tribes Duri is important to be contextually examined through a research approach. As a literacy for developing unlimited tolerance in the frame of pluralism, it is very appropriate if this study is analyzed using the perspective of the sociology of development. The process of developing through a migration program, I take field data through qualitative research. The data source was taken directly to the informant with the snowball sampling technique. After the data were analyzed by the process of data reduction, data display, and conclusion, I found that government policy was not optimal in accommodating the migration program. There are still occur caused by the inferior of people for the meaning of pluralism. Although in general, the community has lived up to the philosophy of Pancasila, these implications are lowly in everyday life. Efforts to reduce conflicts that occur in Bengkalis, the government needs to develop a roadmap for policies on religious dialogue. Religious harmony is very important. It is impossible to realize tolerance without limits if the supporting instruments are not a priority agenda. Especially in areas prone to an inter-religious conflict which are actually caused by economic disparity and political oligarchy.
Studi ini bertujuan menjelaskan tentang konsep kebijakan yang perlu diterapkan oleh pemerintah dalam menangkal intoleransi beragama. Selain faktor pemerataan penduduk dan kesejahteraan ekonomi, penting kiranya pemerintah memperhatikan aspek sosialkeagamaan atas kasus migrasi yang terjadi di pedalaman Duri Bengkalis, Riau. Agar cita-cita pembangunan sosial secara nasional dapat terwujud, potret proses migrasi suku Batak Kristen ke pedalaman Duri harus menjadi outlook dalam menyusun kebijakan tanpa menimbulkan konflik sosial. Menyoroti kasus intoleransi antara suku Batak Kristen dan Muslim Melayu Duri menjadi penting untuk ditelaah secara kontekstual melalui pendekatan riset. Sebagai acuan mengembangkan toleransi tanpa batas dalam bingkai pluralisme, kajian ini dianalisis menggunakan perspektif sosiologi pembangunan. Proses pembangunan bangsa melalui program migrasi, penulis mengambil data lapangan melalui penelitian kualitatif. Sumber data diambil langsung kepada informan dengan teknik snowball sampling. Setelah data dianalisis dengan proses reduksi data, display data, dan penarikan kesimpulan, penulis menemukan belum optimalnya kebijakan pemerintah dalam mengakomodir program migrasi. Hal utama yang menjadi pemicunya adalah masih rendahnya masyarakat memahami makna pluralisme. Walaupun secara umum masyarakat sudah menghayati falsafah Pancasila, tetapi masih rendahnya implikasi tersebut dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Upaya meredam konflik yang terjadi di Bengkalis, pemerintah perlu menyusun roadmap kebijakan tentang dialog agama. Kerukunan agama sangat penting ditegakkan. Mustahil dapat mewujudkan sikap toleransi tanpa batas jika instrumen pendukungnya bukan menjadi agenda prioritas. Terutama di daerah-daerah yang rawan konflik antar umat beragama yang sejatinya disebabkan oleh faktor kesenjangan ekonomi dan oligarki politik.
References
Ardbuckle, G. A. (1995). Multiculturalism, Internationality, and Religious Life. Review for Religious, 54(1).
Budiwanti, E. (2009). Pluralism Collapses: A Study of the Jama’ah Ahmadiyah Indonesia and Its Persecution. Asia Research Institute Working Paper, (117). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1645144
Budiyono, A. (1989). Membina kerukunan Hidup Antarumat Beriman. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Bungin, B. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Burahanuddin, Y. (2008). Kerukunan dan Toleransi di Tengah Pluratis Bangsa. Jakarta: Yayasan Ilmu.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Deddy, M. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Douglas, E. R. (1995). Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, Islam and the Ideology of Tolerance. London: Routledge.
Hakim, L. N. (2012). Tindak Kekerasan Terhadap Jamaah Ahmadiyah Indonesia : Sebuah Kajian Psikologi Sosial. Aspirasi, 2(1), 23–44. Retrieved from http://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/aspirasi/article/view/435
Hamdan, D. (2012). Membangun Kerukunan Beragama dan Berpolitik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Lekugama.
Hasbullah, M., & et.al. (1987). Amal Bakti Departemen Agama 3 Januari 1946-3 Januari 1987: Eksistensi dan Derap Langkahnya. Jakarta: Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia.
Ichwan, M. N. (2016). MUI, Gerakan Islamis, dan Umat Mengambang. Ma’arif Institute, 87–104.
Jacqueline Hicks. (2014). Heresy and Authority: Understanding the Turn against Ahmadiyah in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 22(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2014.0216
Jenkins, R. (2007). The place of theory: John Rex’s contribution to the Sociological study of ethnicity and race. London: Polity Press.
Kodiran. (2013). Pluralitas dan Kekayaan Kazanah Budaya Indonesia. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Lutfi, A. (2009). Transmigrasi dan Penguatan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Makin, A. (2017). Homogenizing Indonesian Islam: Persecution of the Shia Group in Yogyakarta. Studia Islamika, 24(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v24i1.3354
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mudji, S., et.al. (2007). Cultural Studies Tantangan Bagi Teori-Teori Besar Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Koekoesan.
Rex, J. (1997). Multicultural and Plural Societies. In G. Montserrat & J. Rex (Eds.), The Ethnicity Reader. London: Polity Press.
Suharsaputra, U. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Tindakan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Tariq, M., & Pnina, W. (1997). The Politics of Multiculturalism in the new Europe: racism, identity and community. London: Zed Books.
Tim Peneliti Infid. (2016). Studi tentang Toleransi dan Radikalisme di Indonesia, Pembelajaran dari 4 Daerah, Tasikmalaya, Jogjakarta, Bojonegoro, dan Kupang. Jakarta.
van de Veer, P. (1995). Nation and Migration: the politics of space in the South Asia diaspora. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Williams, R. (2001). Cultural Theory: an Introduction. Oxford-UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Zainuddin. (2014). Kebijakan Politik Pemerintah Pada Kerukunan Umat Beragama. Jakarta: Balitbang Kemenag.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
(1) The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.(2) Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
(3) The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions.
(4) The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site.