GAMBARAN KREATIVITAS GURU DALAM PENERAPAN KURIKULUM 2013 SEKOLAH DASAR DI SURABAYA

Uni Kartika Sari, Nono Hery Yoenanto

Abstract


This research aims to determine teacher creativity in the 2013 curriculum implementation of elementary school in Surabaya. The teacher's creativity refers to Guilford's creativity (1967) that involves fluency of thinking, flexibility, originality and elaboration. Meanwhile, the Bronfenbrenner’s ecological system theory used as the grand theory. This research focuses on “X” and “Y” elementary schools. The instrumental case study took as design research, which used variant participants who interviewed by researcher such as teachers, principals and parents. This study uses a thematic analysis of data. Findings indicate that teacher creativity in the 2013 curriculum implementation have been carried out well where from fluency, flexibility and elaboration in planning of learning, process and evaluating learning outcomes of student. Meanwhile, the originality that related with the teacher's idea in planning learning still lacks authenticity. Furthermore, teacher also lack to creativity of assessment due to the thematic assessment content that depend respective educational units.

Keywords


Elementary School, Curriculum, Creativity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(9), 106-107.

Bachtiar, M. (2015). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 pada bimbingan dan konseling sebagai penunjang pembentukan karakter. Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 6(2),171-194.

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher,25(9), 6-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025009006

Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education,60 (5), 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479

Berns, R. M. (2010). Child, family, school, community: Socialitazion and support (Eighth edition ed.). USA: Cengage Learning.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. California: SAGE Publication.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publication, inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Danoebroto, S. W. (2015). Teori belajar konstruktivis Piaget dan Vigotsky. Indonesian Digital Journal of Matematics and Education, 2(3), 191-198.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 (1-2), 35-47. https://DOI: 10.1177/0022487109348024

Dau-Gaspar, O. (2013). The teacher's creative attitudes- An influence factor of the students' creative attitudes. Future Education International Conference, Florence, Italy, June 13-14.

Erviana, V. Y. (2016). Analisis buku muatan tematik integratif, scientific approach, dan authentic assessment kelas II sekolah dasar. Elementary School, 3 (1), 108-122.

Handini, D., Gusrayani, D., & Panjaitan, R. L. (2016). Penerapan model contextual teaching and learning meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas IV pada materi gaya. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah,1(1), 451-460.

Hastuti, W. H., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2018). Pengaruh self-regulated learning, kecemasan matematika, dukungan sosial guru matemtika, dan dukungan sosial teman sebaya terhadap prestasi belajar siswa SMP Negeri "X" Surabaya. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 6 (2), 116-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v6i2.1524

Iriana, F. (2016). Pengembangan kurikulum: teori, konsep dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Parama Ilmu.

Kim, U. (2007). Creating a world of possibilities indigenous and cultural perspective. In A.-G. Tan, Creativity: A handbook for teachers (p. xi). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Monawati, & Fauzi. (2018). Hubungan kreativitas mengajar guru dengan prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Pesona Dasar, 6 (2), 33-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/pear.v6i2.12195

Ningrum, E. S., & Sobri, A. Y. (2015). Implementasi kurikulum 2013 di sekolah dasar. Manajemen Pendidikan 24 (5), 416-423.

Roy, J. (2013). Elementary teacher perceptions of teaching practices that foster creative thinking in students. Inquiry: The University of Arkansas Undergraduate Research Journal, 14(9), 75-94.

Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity, theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

Sali, G., & Akyol, A. K. (2015). Creativity of preschool and elementary school teachers and their students. Perceptual & Motor Skills: Learning & Memory, 121(3), 759-765.

https://DOI 10.2466/22.PMS.121c27x2

Salkind, N. (2004). An introduction to theories of human development. London: Sage Publication, Inc.

Slavin, R. (2000). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (6thEd).Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Tabroni. (2015). Upaya menyiapkan pendidikan yang berkualitas. Jurnal Kependidikan Islam IAIN Sulthan, 54-67.

Vasudevan, H. (2013). The influence of teachers' creativity, attitude and commitment on students' proficiency of the english language. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(2), 12-19.

Yee, F. P. (2004). Developing creativity in the Singapore primary mathematics classroom: Factors that support and inhibit. Educational Research Association of Singapore (ERAS), 24-26 November.

Yohanes, R. S. (2010). Teori vygotsky dan implikasinya terhadap pembelajaran matematika. Widya Warta No. 02 Tahun XXXIV, Juli, 127-135.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v7i2.1809

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Psikologi Integratif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.