Evalusi Kinerja Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP) dan Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP) untuk Layanan Video Streaming

Ahmad Akmaluddin, Arini Arini, Siti Ummi Masruroh

Abstract


Realtime (streaming) data communication has become a major requirement for companies and government institutions. Communication that occurs is not only limited to one particular local area but covers other areas so as to form a broad network (WAN). In building network infrastructure, one of the most important things is how networks can deal with failure (failure) on a computer network consists of failure of devices (devices) that affect Quality of Services (QoS). In every internet network design process, a redundant line is always added to complete the main line. So that if the main line is disrupted, data traffic can be transferred to the backup path, this process is called network redundancy. So that if one gateway dies, another gateway will immediately replace the dead gateway. There are two protocols included in the FHRP, namely Hot Standby Routing Protocol (HSRP), and Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP), these two protocols that can overcome this problem. So from that this study will discuss which protocol between the two protocols has the best performance in overcoming the problem. Methods of data collection with literature studies and literature studies, simulations carried out with 8 stages (problem formulation, conceptual models, input & output data, modeling, simulation, verification & validation, experimentation, and output analysis). The results of this study provide the best QoS value for the delay value is the HSRP ROUTER protocol, and for the value of packet loss is HSRP, and for throughput value is HSRP and the routing protocol that is appropriate for the network for video streaming services is HSRP




Keywords


Evaluation of Performance of Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP) and Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP) for Streaming Video Services "Performance valuations, Routing Protocol, Delay, Packet Loss, Throughput, Simulation Methods, RIPng, EIGRP, OSPFv3, St

Full Text:

PDF

References


BAHNASSE, A., & ELKAMOUN, N. (2016). A Policy Based Management of a Smart Adaptive QoS for the Dynamic and Multipoint Virtual Private Network.

Cisco Dynamic Multipoint VPN. (2008). Simple and Secure Branch-to-Branch Communications.

Cisco, N. A. (2014). Routing Protocols Companion Guide, Indiana: Cisco Press.

Dash, P. (2013). Getting Started with Oracle VM VirtualBox. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.

Fiade, A. (2013). Simulasi Jaringan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Hasanah, F. U., Mubarakah, N., Lan, K. K., Ring, T., Rip, R. D., & Tracer, C. P. (2014). Analisis Kinerja Routing Dinamis Dengan Teknik RIP (Routing Information Protocol) Pada Topologi Ring Dalam Jaringan LAN (Local Area Network) Menggunakan Cisco Packet Tracer, 7 (3), 118–124.

Kalamani P., Kumar M. V., Chithambarathanu M., Thomas R. (2016) Comparison of RIP, EIGRP, OSPF, IGRP Routing Protocols in Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) by Using OPNET Simulator Tool

Kurose, J. F., & Ross, K. W. (2013). Computer Networking A Top-Down Approach. Pearson.

Madani, S. A., Kazmi, J., & Mahlknecht, S., (2010) Wireless Sensor Network: Modeling and Simulation.

Masruroh, S. U., Iman, M. F., Fiade, A. (2016) Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols RIPv2, OSPF, EIGRP with BGP.

Masruroh, S. U., Robby, F., & Hakiem, N. (2016). Performance of Routing Protocols RIPng, OSPFv3, and EIGRP in an IPv6 Network.

Masruroh, S. U., Wijaya K. H. P., Fiade, A. (2016) Performance Evaluation DMVPN Using Routing Protocol RIP, OSPF and EIGRP.

Neumann, J. (2015). The Book of GNS3, Build Virtual Network Labs Using Cisco, Juniper, and more. San Fransisco: No Starch Press.

Osvari (2006). Membangun Jaringan Komunikasi Data Dengan Frame Relay.

Pratama, I (2014). Smart City Beserta Cloud Computing dan Teknologi-teknologi Pendukung Lainnya. Bandung: Informatika.

Sangadji, E. M. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian – Pendekatan Praktis dalam Penelitian. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Sofana, I (2011). Teori dan Modul Praktikum Jaringan Komputer. Bandung: Modula.

Cisco Dynamic Multipoint VPN. (2008). Simple and Secure Branch-to-Branch Communications.

Osvari (2006). Membangun Jaringan Komunikasi Data Dengan Frame Relay.

Sofana, I. (2012). CISCO CCNA & Jaringan Komputer. Bandung: Informatika.

Sofana, I. (2013). CISCO CCNP & Jaringan Komputer. Bandung: Informatika.

Statista. (2015) Retrieved November 7, 2016, from Top Markets VPN Proxy Usage: https://www.statista.com/statistics/301204/top-markets-vpn-proxy-usage/.

https://id.vpnmentor.com/blog/statistik-penggunaan-vpn-dan-privasi-data/

Sudaryono, Suryo Guritno dan Untung Rahardja 2011. Theory and Application of IT Research Metodologi Penelitian Teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta:ANDI

Sullenberger. M, (2010). Dynamic Multipoint VPN (DMVPN) Design and Positioning.

Towidjodjo, R. (2016). Mikrotik Kung Fu Kitab 3. Bandung: Jasakom.

Wisnu Af. (2014) Retrieved November 7, 2016, from DMVPN Overview http://blog.wisnuaf.com/dmvpn-overview/.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/csecurity.2019.%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 ahmad akmaluddin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2615-8442