Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

IJID accepts submission of manuscripts on

  1. Computer science; 
  2. Engineering and technology relating to informatics on development. 
We are promoting an interdisciplinary approach to work on these issues. Apart from the issues given above, the Editorial Board welcomes papers from other areas of computing and informatics.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Papers are blindly reviewed by experts and specialits in computer science, engineering and technology relating to informatics on development. When a paper past an initial review, it will be reviewed by at least two reviewers. The reviewers use our review guidelines to judge your paper. We will let you know as soon as the reviews are done.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Thus, IJID is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. It is because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Period

IJID is a biannual peer-revewed journal published in June and December by the Faculty of Science and Technology State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta-Indonesia.


Anti Plagiarism Policy

It is basically author’s duty to only submit a manuscript that is free from plagiarism and academically malpractices. The editor, however, double checks each article before its publication. The first step is to check plagiarism against as much as possible online databases either by using specific tool such as Turnitin or not. The second step is to assess comprehensively papers by editors.


Publication Ethics

Publication ethics, which is adapted by IJID is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

1. Allegations of Misconduct

Should there is any allegation of misconduct relating to IJID's publication, IJID will pay attention on this case and listen to its editorial board members advice. 

 2. Authorship and Contributorship

All submitted papers are based on double-blind peer-review process. This process usually involves two reviewers who are experts in the area of the particular paper. The possible decisions of the review process are acceptance, acceptance with revisions, resubmit for review, or rejection. The acceptance of a paper is constrained by legal requirements such as it does not contain any libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. All contributor authors should be added as authors for the paper. IJID are not responsible for any complaints about authorship.  

 3. Complaints and Appeals

IJID are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. IJID is also responsible for fair publications and do not have any conflicts of interest between editors and authors. Should there is any complaints or appeals relating to publication of paper, IJID is responsible to give clear explanations and it is possible to show evidence. 

 4. Conflicts of Interest/ Competing Interests

As explained by COPE, "a conflict of interests or competing interests is a situation in which a person or organization is involved in multiple interests, financial interest, or otherwise, one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation of the individual or organization. The presence of a COI is independent of the occurrence of impropriety." IJID will not involve in or accept any COI or CI in all its publication. Should they occur, IJID will retract the involved paper and put an embargo on suspects. 

 5. Data and Reproducibility

IJID is encouraging authors to welcome readers of accessing their data shared on their paper. Authors should follow guidelines according to standard practice in their disciplines about data and reproducibility. However, IJID is promoting data confendiality for certain cases.

 6. Ethical Oversight

In publishing paper, IJID welcomes all quality, scholarly paper from authors, which fulfil ethical conduct of research in authors discipline research. 

 7. Intellectual Property

IJID does not take any money from authors on publishing their paper. It is also stated clearly on Author Fees section. Policy relating to copyright has been given on IJID Copyright. IJID checks papers using plagiarism checker that IJID has access to use it. Should there is any further research of any IJID's paper, this extended version should be clearly mentioned on the upcoming paper and the related IJID's paper should be cited.

 8. Journal Management

Dedicated scholar in their disciplines supports IJID. IJID encourages its editors to attend workshops or seminars relate to journal management. 

 9. Peer-Review Processes

IJID adopts double-blind peer-review process for its prospective paper.  Regarding to this issue, IJID has provided its policies on Peer Review section.

 10. Post-publication Discussions and Corrections

IJID allows debate post publication by using IJID website, letters to IJID's editor, or external moderated site. All of these debates should follow government rules.


Authors’ Responsibilities

Authors of IJID are responsible to obey Author Guidelines of IJID, IJID Copyright and those 10 policies adopted from COPE.

 Reviewers’ Responsibilities

Reviewers of IJID should be responsible to comply with the above 10 policies from COPE. Factors that are considered in review process are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.

Editors’ Responsibilities

Editors of IJID should be responsible to adhere to 10 policies from COPE. Editors should set up their decisions completely on the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s focus and scope.