Analisis Pertimbangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Nomor 49/PUU-XVI/2018 Tentang Presidential Treshold

Fajar Tri Laksono

Abstract


Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections Article
222 governing the threshold of the nomination of president and
vice president (presidential treshold). The Constitutional Court
has decided that the threshold for nominating a president and
vice president is in accordance with the constitution. This
research is categorized as library research with literature
study. The type of approach is legal normative. Considerations
of the Constitutional Court ruled that the threshold article
(presidential treshold) is constitutional. First, the sound of
Article threshold limits the political parties participating in the
Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections which have passed
the verification by the General Election Commission. Unfair
treatment is evident for participants in the general election,
especially political parties who qualify to participate in the
general election and especially for those who want to run for
president and vice president. Second, the implementation of the
presidential threshold is not appropriate to strengthen the
presidential system in Indonesia. Presidential Treshold is not a
prerequisite for nomination, but a requirement for applying a
minimum threshold for presidential election.
Keywords: Presidential Treshold, Constitutional Court,
Constitutionality


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aikin, Sinan Aikin, “Underrepresentative Democracy: Why

Turkey Should Abandon Europe’s Highest Electoral

Threshold,” Washington University Global Studies Law

Review, Vol. 10, 2011.

Amsari, Feri, Perubahan UUD 1945: Perubahan Konstitusi

NKRI Melalui Putusan Mahkamah, Jakarta: Konstitusi,

Rajawali Pers, 2011.

Gaffar, Janedjri M., Hukum Pemilu Dalam Yurisprudensi

Mahkamah Konstitusi,

Hanta Yuda AR, Presidensiilisme Setengah Hati: Dari Dilema

ke Kompromi, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2010.

Haricahyono, Cheppy Haricahyono, Ilmu Politik dan

Perspektifnya, Yogyakarta : Tiara Wacana Yogya, 1991.

Haris, Syamsuddin, Masalah-masalah Demokrasi Kebangsaan

di Era Reformasi Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2014.

Jakarta: Konstitusi Pres, 2013.

Kartawidjaja Pipit R., Memperkuat Sistem Presidensialisme

Indonesia (Kumpulan Paper), Jakarta: Sindikasi Pemilu

dan Demokrasi, 2016.

Latif, Abdul, Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi: Upaya

Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi, Yogyakarta:

Total Media, 2009.

Mainwaring, Scott, “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and

Democracy; The Difficult Combination”, Comparative

Political Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1993.

Pamungkas, Sigit, Perihal Pemilihan umum, Yogyakarta:

Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Jurusan

Ilmu Pemerintahan Fisipol, 2009.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-XVI/2018

tentang Presidential Treshold.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 53/PUU-XV/2017.

Syamsuddin, Haris. Salah Kaprah Presidential Threshold,

http://lipi.go.id/berita/single/SALAH-KAPRAHPRESIDENTIALTHRESHOLD/ 7896, diakses tanggal 1

November 2018.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Uundang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan

Umum


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Fajar Tri Laksono




JURNAL Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Indexed by:

width="50" width="50"  width="60"
width="60"

 

 

JURNAL SUPREMASI HUKUM
Departement of Law Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Marsda Adi Sucipto Street, Caturtunggal, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281 - Phone 0274-512474