Synergistic Municipal-community partnership: Resolving Challenges in the Implementation of the National Slum Upgrading Program (KOTAKU) in Gajah Wong Riverbank Area, Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2023.072-02Keywords:
Participation, KOTAKU, Settlement PlanningAbstract
The successful resolution of challenges faced during the implementation of the National Slum Upgrading (KOTAKU) Program in Gajah Wong Riverbank area, marked by initial resistance from affected communities, was achieved through the inclusive engagement of diverse community elements and collaborating agencies. This intricate interplay among stakeholders has a profound influence on the program’s effectiveness. This study aims to unravel the dynamic relationships forged among various agencies and community components within the conflict management framework, ultimately enhancing program implementation. To attain this objective, a qualitative methodology employing a case study approach was utilized. The investigation revealed that the local government, in executing the National Slum Upgrading (KOTAKU), fostered collaboration with other governmental entities through a synergistic alignment of related programs. Reinforcing the program through the utilization of complementary initiatives contributed to achieving program objectives without resource constraints. The synergy among agencies was bolstered by optimizing existing social institutions within the community as active program implementers. This, in turn, positively influenced the processes of identification, socialization, and coordination, ensuring their effectiveness. Furthermore, the active involvement of the local community played a pivotal role in addressing challenges and overcoming initial resistance. The application of a persuasive socialization model effectively conveyed the program’s significance in improving the residents’ welfare, thereby fostering acceptance. This collaborative pattern depicts a synergistic model aligning policy maker interests with community needs, characterized by a continuous spectrum of participation and empowerment.
Abstract viewed: 165 times
|
PDF downloaded = 45 times
References
Afthanorhan, A., Mamun, A. Al, Zainol, N. R., Foziah, H., & Awang, Z. (2020). Framing the Retirement Planning Behavior Model towards Sustainable Wellbeing among Youth: The Moderating Effect of Public Profiles. Sustainability, 12(21), 8879. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218879
Andriany, D. (2015). Pengembangan Model Pendekatan Partisipatif dalam Memberdayakan Masyarakat Miskin Kota Medan untuk Memperbaiki Taraf Hidup. Seminal Nasional Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Akuntansi (Snema) Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Padang.
Angelia, N., Batubara, B. M., Zulyadi, R., Hidayat, T. W., & Hariani, R. R. (2020). Analysis of Community Institution Empowerment as a Village Government Partner in the Participative Development Process. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.991
Batara, A. S., Syafar, M., & Palutturi, S. (2018). Pentingnya Kolaborasi Stakeholder dalam Mewujudkan Terminal Sehat di Sulawesi Selatan. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 1(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.56338/ MPPKI.V1I1.129
Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., Fazey, I., Martín-López, B., Hondrila, K., König, A., von Wehrden, H., Schäpke, N. A., Laubichler, M. D., & Lang, D. J. (2020). A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4(2), 93–100. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z
Chan, K. M. A., Boyd, D. R., Gould, R. K., Jetzkowitz, J., Liu, J., Muraca, B., Naidoo, R., Olmsted, P., Satterfield, T., Selomane, O., Singh, G. G., Sumaila, R., Ngo, H. T., Boedhihartono, A. K., Agard, J., de Aguiar, A. P. D., Armenteras, D., Balint, L., Barrington-Leigh, C., Brondízio, E. S. (2020). Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People and Nature, 2(3), 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10124
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
Delyus, R. N., Anggreta, D. K., & Rahmadani, S. (2023). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program KOTAKU Menggunakan Gagasan G.C. Homans di Pasar Pandan Air Mati, Kota Solok. Jurnal Intervensi Sosial Dan Pembangunan (JISP), 4(2), 87–102. Efendi, D., Prastiyo, E. B., Studi, P., & Publik, A. (2020). Sosiologi. Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, VIII(1), 41–47.
Eferyn, K., YAP, N., Puspita, N. V., & Prihardina, O. W. (2023). Penguatan Pembukuan Unit Pengelola Keuangan Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh Kabupaten Trenggalek. ADMA : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 4(1), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.30812/adma.v4i1.2967
Fu, T., & Mao, S. (2022). Individual Social Capital and Community Participation: An Empirical Analysis of Guangzhou, China. Sustainability, 14(12), 6966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126966
Fudge Schormans, A. (2014). Social Participation. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 6135–6140). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2779
Haklay, M. (2017). The Three Eras of Environmental Information: The Roles of Experts and the Public. In V. Loreto,
M. Haklay, A. Hotho, V. D. P. Servedio, G. Stumme, J. Theunis, & F. Tria (Eds.), Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Springer International Publishing.
Hu, Q., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Smart city initiatives: A comparative study of American and Chinese cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1694413
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis (a Source book of New Methods). SAGE Publications.
Nurkhasanah, N., & Wahyunengseh, R. D. (2021). Analisis Konteks: Perubahan Perilaku Masyarakat Pasca Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU). Wacana Publik, 1(2), 416. https://doi.org/10.20961/wp.v1i2.54607
Plummer, J. (2000). Municipalities and Community Participation: A Sourcebook for Capacity Building. Earthscan Publications.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The Prosperous Community. The American Prospect, 4(13).
Rositasari, R., & Mulyadi, A. W. E. (2022). Kolaborasi Stakeholder dalam Perencanaan Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU) di Kecamatan Jaten Kabupaten Karanganyar. Wacana Publik, 2(2), 376. https://doi. org/10.20961/wp.v2i2.66544
Safrizal, S., Safuridar, S., & Fuad, M. (2021). Mengevaluasi Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (Studi Kasus pada Wilayah Kota Langsa). Jurnal Samudra Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 12(2), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.33059/ jseb.v12i2.3242
Sahroni, S. (2019). Pembelajaran Masyarakat Berbasis Masalah sebagai Strategi Meningkatkan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program KOTAKU. Mimbar Pendidikan, 4(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v4i2.22204
Shelton, R. C., Chambers, D. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2020). An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability: Addressing Dynamic Context and Promoting Health Equity Over Time. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00134
Sitorus, H., Astuti, R. S., & Purnaweni, H. (2020). Implementasi Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU) Dalam Menanggulangi Kawasan Kumuh di Kelurahan Tanjung Mas Kota Semarang. Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 8(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v8i1.1617
Syamsiar, N. R., Surya, B., & Tato, S. (2020). Evaluasi Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh ( Studi Pada Penanganan Program KOTAKU Kelurahan Banggae Kabupaten Majene ). Urban and Regional Studies Journal (URSJ), 2(2), 54–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35965/ursj.v2i2.324
Teorell, J. (2006). Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 787–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00636.x
Wastiti, A., Purnaweni, H., & Rahman, A. Z. (2021). Faktor Pendorong dan Faktor Penghambat Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU) di Kelurahan Rejomulyo Kecamatan Semarang Timur Kota Semarang. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 10(4), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.14710/JPPMR.V10I4.32126
Yanti, A. N., Ashad, H., & Musa, R. (2020). Effectiveness of The City Without Slum (KOTAKU) Program in Infrastructure Development and Improvement (Case Study of Kampung Buyang Village, Mariso District, Makassar City). UNDERPASS: Journal of Civil Engineering, Applied Sciences, and Technology, 4(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Widati Widati, Ratna Sesotya W, & Oktarina Albizzia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
(1) The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.(2) Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
(3) The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions.
(4) The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site.
