Seizing the Opportunity: Dynamics of the Salafi-Wahabi Movement in Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2023.071-01Keywords:
Salafism, Turkey, Da'wah, Political OpportunityAbstract
Being a secular state after centuries under the Islamic sultanate of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey has been challenged by various internal political turmoil and controversies over religion and its relation to the state. As such, fierce debate has become unavoidable for Islamist and revivalist groups that feel discriminated against for practicing Islam in public spaces. This article discusses Salafism and Wahabism in contemporary Turkey, starting from its inception to its da'wah and development strategies in society. The article used a qualitative approach with a literature review. The data was collected from secondary sources, including research results by scholars and various pieces of information in the mass media that emerged during the era of Recep Tayyip Erdogan until 2022. This article scrutinizes (1) the history of the resurgence of Salafism and Wahabism in Turkey due to the influence of the social and political situation; (2) pro-Islamic political policies in the government providing an opportunity for Salafi and Wahabi to develop in Turkey; and (3) the form and strategy of a pro-active and non-confrontational Salafi group in Turkey. This third part is very urgent for this article because it relates to secular Turkey's social, political, and cultural contexts.


References
Akin, M. (2015). Muhammed b. Abdülvehhâb’in Tevhid Anlayişina Eleştirel bir Yaklaşim. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, XIX(1), 109–134.
Altun, B. (2015). Selefilik-Vehhabîli̇k ve Türki̇ye’deki Faali̇yetleri̇. İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ.
Altun, B. (2022). Tarihsel ve Güncel Boyutlarıyla Selefîlik-Vehhâbîlik ve Türkiye’de Selefîlik. Yeni Balkan.
Anjum, T. (2006). Sufism in History and its Relationship with Power. Islamic Studies, 45(2), 221–268.
Aydin, M. (2018). Kitap Tanıtımı: İslam Düşüncesinde Selefîlik Genel Karakteristiği ve Günümüzdeki Motivasyonları. 2(2), 318–327.
Baskan, B. (2019). Turkey between Qatar and Saudi Arabia: Changing regional and bilateral relations. Uluslararasi Iliskiler, 16(62), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.588947
Bayram, A. (2014). The Rise of Wahhabi Sectarianism and its Impact in Saudi Arabia. Atatuk Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi, 42.
Bulut, M. H. (2021). Wahhabism confronted: Origins, corollaries of ideology. Daily Sabah. https://www.dailysabah.com/arts/wahhabism-confronted-origins-corollaries-of-ideology/news
Büyükkara, M. A. (2012). VEHHÂBÎLİK - TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/vehhabilik
Canli, E., Geldi, M., & Boyraz, T. A. (2021). S. Arabia decides to close 8 Turkish schools with 2,256 students by end of 2021. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/s-arabia-decides-to-close-8-turkish-schools-with-2-256-students-by-end-of-2021/2223823
Castigliano, F. (2022). Flaneuring the buyosphere: A comparative historical analysis of shopping environments and phantasmagorias. Journal of Consumer Culture, 23(2), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405221111454
Chiricos, T., Pickett, J. T., & Lehmann, P. S. (2020). Group Threat and Social Control: A Review of Theory and Research. In Criminal Justice Theory (Issue January 2022, pp. 69–92). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003016762-4
Choksy, C. E. B., & Choksy, J. K. (2015). The Saudi Connection: Wahhabism and Global Jihad. World Affairs, 178(1), 23–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43555279
Çiçek, M. T. (2017). The tribal partners of empire in Arabia: The Ottomans and the Rashidis of Najd, 1880-1918. New Perspectives on Turkey, 56(56), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2017.7
Coskun, B. (2020, November 6). From Khashoggi to boycott, looming tension between Saudis and Turkey. Daily Sabah. https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/op-ed/from-khashoggi-to-boycott-looming-tension-between-saudis-and-turkey
Craig, M. A., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2018). Racial and Political Dynamics of an Approaching “Majority-Minority” United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 677(1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218766269
Cumhuriyet.com.tr. (2017). Kan donduran fetva: Ateistlerle tartışmak eziklik, 1 yaşındaki kızla da evlenilebilir. Www.Cumhuriyet.Com.Tr. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/kan-donduran-fetva-ateistlerle-tartismak-eziklik-1-yasindaki-kizla-da-evlenilebilir-812382
Dalkilic, M., & Bicer, R. (2017). Turkiye Algisi Baglaminda Makedonya’da Asiri Dini Gruplar ve Turkiye-Balkan Iliskilerine Etkisi (Vehhabilik/Selefilik Ornegi). E-Makâlât Mezhep Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 585–616.
Demetriou, C. (2012). Processual Comparative Sociology: Building on the Approach of Charles Tilly. Sociological Theory, 30(1), 51–65.
DOĞRU, A. (2017). Hybrid Warfare, Daesh and Turkey’s Stance. Journal of Crises and Political Research, 1(2).
Emecen, F. (1988). ABDULLAH b. SUÛD - TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/abdullah-b-suud
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge.
Haber7. (2010). Erdoğan: Köpekleri “Arap arap” çağıran anlayış vardı. Haber7.Com. https://www.haber7.com/siyaset/haber/478276-erdogan-kopekleri-arap-arap-cagiran-anlayis-vardi
Hammond, A. (2015). Salafism Infiltrates Turkish Religious Discourse. Middle East Institute. https://www.mei.edu/publications/salafism-infiltrates-turkish-religious-discourse
Hammond, A. (2017). Salafi Thought in Turkish Public Discourse since 1980. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 49(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743817000319
Hanagan, M., & Tilly, C. (Eds.). (2014). Contention and Trust in Cities and States. Springer.
Hjerm, M. (2007). Do numbers really count? Group threat theory revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(8), 1253–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830701614056
Hut, D. (2016). Osmanli Arap Vi̇layetleri̇, Arabi̇zm Ve Mi̇lli̇yetçi̇li̇ği̇. VAKANÜVİS - UluslararasiTari̇h AraştirmalarDergi̇si̇, 1(0), 105–105. https://doi.org/10.24186/vakanuvis.261581
Ibáñez, J. J. R., & Sabatini, G. (2009). Monarchy as conquest: Violence, social opportunity, and political stability in the establishment of the hispanic monarchy. Journal of Modern History, 81(3), 501–536. https://doi.org/10.1086/599270
İşcan, M. Z. (2015). Tarih Boyunca Selefi Söylem. Ýlahiyat Akademi Dergisi, 1–2, 1–14.
Istanbulgercegi. (2017). İmam Ahmed Vakfı’ndan kan donduran fetva: 1 yaşındaki kızla da evlenilebilir. Istanbulgercegi.Com. https://www.istanbulgercegi.com/imam-ahmed-vakfindan-kan-donduran-fetva-1-yasindaki-kizla-da-evlenilebilir_135810.html
Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Karakuş, K., Çelİkyürek, H., Aygün, T., Turgut, M., Üniversitesi, Ö., Fakültesi, Z., & Bölümü, Z. (2020). Türkiye ile Suud i Arabistan Arasındaki Canlı Hayvan ve Et Ticaretine Genel Bir Bakış. Journal of Animal Science and Products (JASP), 3(1), 85–94.
Karmon, E., & Barak, M. (2018). Erdogan’s Turkey and the Palestinian issue. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(2), 74–85.
Keller, R. (2006). Analysing discourse. An approach from the sociology of knowledge. Historical Social Research, 31(2), 223–242.
King, R. D. (2007). The Context of Minority Group Threat: Race, Institutions, and Complying with Hate Crime Law. Law and Society Review, 41(1), 189–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00295.x
Knights, M. (2014). ISIL’s Political-Military Power in Iraq. CTC Sentinel, 7(8), 1–7. https://ctc.usma.edu/app/uploads/2014/09/CTCSentinel-Vol7Iss84.pdf%0Ahttps://www.ctc.usma.edu/v2/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/CTCSentinel-Vol7Iss81.pdf
Kocaoglu, C. (2017). Selefiliğe Tarihsel Bir Bakış ve Suudi Arabistan’ın Selefilik Üzerine Geliştirdiği Politikayı Yayma Stratejisi. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi /, 6(2), 333–353. http://www.21yyte.org/tr/arastirma/teostrateji-arastirmalari-merkezi/2014/08/29/7751/akli-
Kurşun, Z. (2014, June 28). Arap milliyetçiliği nasıl gelişti? Al Jazeera. http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/gorus/arap-milliyetciligi-nasil-gelisti
Leavy, P. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press.
Lieberson, S. (1968). Review Work: Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations by Hubert M. Blalock. American Journal of Sociology, 74(1), 83–84.
Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2008). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/424628
Mandaville, P. (2014). Islam and Politics. In Islam and Politics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814773
Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110545
Meyer, D. S., & Minkoff, D. C. (2004). Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces, 82(4), 1457–1492. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0082
Musterd, S., & Andersson, R. (2005). Housing mix, social mix, and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), 761–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405276006
Nonneman, G. (2001). Saudi-European Relations 1902-2001: A Pragmatic Quest for Relative Autonomy. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs, 77(3), 631–661.
Öğür, B., Baykal, Z., & Balcı, A. (2014). Kuzey Irak-Türkiye İlişkileri: PKK, Güvenlik ve İşbirliği. Ortadoğu Araştırmaları Merkezi Sakarya Üniversitesi.
Ohemeng, F. L. K. (2020). Comparative Historical Analysis, A Methodological Perspective. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (Issue July). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5
Özgüzer, G. E., & Pensieroso, L. (2017). An analysis of Turkey’s accession to the European Union Published. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(4), 1380–1405.
Papas, A. (2006). Toward a New History of Sufism: The Turkish Case. History of Religions, 46(1), 81–90.
Pasha, I. F. (2019). Vehhâbî Düşüncenin Dayanağı. İlahiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(11), 165–173.
Salman, S. (2020). IŞİD’in İdeolojisi: Cihadi Selefilik. Lectio Socialis, 4(July), 97–112.
Sujibto, B. J. (2019). Tek Millet, Nationalism Religious Edoganism. Jurnal Penelitian, 16(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.5130/lns.v17i2.1360
Sujibto, B. J. (2023). Erdoganisme: Kebangkitan, Krisis, dan Pergulatannya. Ircisod.
Tabak, H. (2017). Manifestations of Islam in Turkey’S Foreign Policy: Islamic Internationalism and Turkish Islam. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 1, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.12775/cjps.2017.001
Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.). (2015). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315675824-3
Taşdelen, M. (2022). Cihadî Selefîlik Bağlamında Neo-selefîliğe Eleştirel Yaklaşım. Dergiabant, 10(1), 71–94.
Tasdemir, D. (2016). Turkiye’de Selefi Hareket ve Dini Radikalizm. ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ.
Taşpinar, Ö. (2018). Turkey: a partner in crisis. Great Decisions, May 2023, 57–68.
Thompson, R., & Simmons, R. (2013). Social mobility and post-compulsory education: revisiting Boudon’s model of social opportunity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5), 744–765.
Türkel, R. (2013). Vehhabilik ve Arkaplanı. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal.
Türkel, R. (2017). Osmanlı Vehhâbîlik Literatürü. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, 15(29), 213–242.
Tweneboah-Koduah, E. Y., Mann, V. E., & Adams, M. (2020). Using Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability Model in Social Marketing to Predict “Galamsey” Behavior in Ghana. Social Marketing Quarterly, 26(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500419901254
Uludağ, A. (2022). Türkiye’de Selefi akımlar yükselişte mi? Dw.Com/Tr. https://www.dw.com/tr/türkiyede-selefi-akımlar-yükselişte-mi/a-62562734
Venetis, E. (2014). The Struggle between Turkey & Saudi Arabia for the Leadership of Sunni Islam (No. 39; Issue 39).
Yalçın, A. (2022). Türkiye’de Etkili Selefî Bir Şahıs: Ziyaeddin el-Kudsi ve Hakka Davet Cemaati. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi İslam Tetkikleri Merkezi Dergisi, 8(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.32955/neu.istem.2022.8.2.05
Yavuz, M. H. (2003). Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford University Press.
Yavuz, M. H., & Ozturk, A. E. (2020). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Islamism, Identity and Memory: Turkey Under Erdoğan. Middle East Critique, 29(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2020.1770439
Yaycı, C. (2019). Irak’ta Yaşanan Savaşlar ve Türkiye’ye Etkileri. Güvenlik Stratejileri, 15(30).
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12144
Yılmaz, Z. (2020). Erdoğan’s presidential regime and strategic legalism: Turkish democracy in the twilight zone. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea, 20(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1745418
قدورة, ع. (2017). السلفية في تركيا : تحديات الانتشار في مجتمع متصوف = Salafism in Turkey: The Challenges of Spreading in a Sufi Society. Siyasat Arabiya, 25, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040877
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 B.J. Sujibto & Ikram Filiz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
(1) The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.(2) Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
(3) The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions.
(4) The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site.