The Effect of the Predict-Discuss-Explain-Observe-Discuss-Explain (PDEODE) Learning Model on Students' Understanding of Physics Concepts in Temperature and Heat Material for Grade XI at SMAN 10 Bone
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/impulse.2026.61-02Keywords:
Concept Understanding, PDEODE Learning Model, Temperature and HeatAbstract
This research was motivated by the persistent gap in assessing students’ conceptual understanding, particularly on the topic of temperature and heat. Although the PDEODE learning model has been widely reported to improve learning outcomes, many previous studies have not examined indicators of conceptual understanding in depth or compared them comprehensively with conventional learning approaches. Therefore, this study aims to determine the differences in students’ understanding of physics concepts between those taught using the PDEODE model and those taught using conventional methods in grade XI at SMAN 10 Bone. This research employed a quasi-experimental design with a quantitative approach, specifically the Matching Only Posttest Control Group Design. The sample consisted of two classes selected through a two-step matching sampling technique, namely the experimental class and the control class. The research instrument was a multiple-choice test consisting of 20 validated items. Data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics, including normality tests, homogeneity tests, and hypothesis testing. The hypothesis test used was the Mann-Whitney test, which resulted in an Asymp Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.049, indicating that the p-value is smaller than the significance level of 0.05. The findings revealed that the average conceptual understanding score of students in the experimental class was 68.12 (good category), while the control class scored 59.79 (moderate category). These results indicate that students taught using the PDEODE model demonstrated higher conceptual understanding. Therefore, it can be concluded that the PDEODE learning model positively influences students’ understanding of physics concepts.
References
Alabdulaziz, M. S. (2022). The effect of using PDEODE teaching strategy supported by the e-learning environment in teaching mathematics for developing the conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills among primary stage students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12019
Asyhari, A., & Harianti, D. (2023). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Integrative Learning (IL) dan Predict, Discus, Explain, Observe, Discuss (PDEODE) terhadap Pemahaman Konsep. Khazanah Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15575/kp.v2i1.8387
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Longman.
Chimmalee, B., & Anupan, A. (2024). The Influence of an Interactive Learning Model Based on the PDEODE Strategy with Cloud Technology on Students’ Self-Regulation in Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology (IJIET), 14(7), 936–944. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.7.2120
Gay, S., Sahjat, S., & Hamid, F. (2022). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Pdeode dan Model PBL Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VII di SMP Negeri 5 Kota Ternate pada Materi Kalor. Edukasi (Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Khairun), 20(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.33387/j.edu.v20i1.4484
Isti’anah, Zaini, T. B., & Ilmiati, A. (2024). Implementasi Strategi MINDS untuk Meningkatkan Pemahamn Konsep dalam Pembelajaran Fisika pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengabdi (Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berbasis Pesantren dan Madrasah), 3(1), 1–12.
Mailani, T., Zulfarina, & Syafii, W. (2022). Development of the PDEODE-WEB Model in Blended Learning to Improve the Students Critical Thinking Skills. 1655(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012054
Marfu’ah, S., Zaenuri, Masrukan, & Walid. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (PRISMA), 5, 50–54.
Ministry of Education and Culture of Republic Indonesia. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah (104 Tahun 2014). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Samsudin, M. A., Jamali, S. M., Zain, A. N. M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2020). The Effect of STEM Project Based Learning on Self-Efficacy among High-School Physics Students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.15
Sarwendah, A., Muhajir, & Sunardjo. (2022). Perbedaan Keterampilan dan Kemampuan Penalaran Formal Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran PDEODE Berbasis Teaching Factory. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia, 12(1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.23887/jurnal_tp.v12i2.1403
Setiani, N., Roza, Y., & Maimunah. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa dalam Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Materi Peluang pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 2286–2297. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1476
Siahaan, A., Akmalia, R., Amelia, L., Sitorus, A. A. M., Siraj, M. S., & Ardiansyah, Y. (2025). Mengelola dan Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan dalam Manajemen Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Journal on Education, 5(3), 5815–5825. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1344
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Zulham, M., Sukmawati, & Yasmin, S. F. (2023). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Ditinjau Motivasi Belajar: Strategi PDEODE (Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain) dan SGD (Small Group Discussion). 3(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.3.1.2023.317
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Impulse: Journal of Research and Innovation in Physics Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
