Critical Discourse Analysis of Gender Construction on Islamic History Content in the Islamic Religious Education Textbook for Junior High School

Authors

  • Mochammad Jiva Agung Wicaksono UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-4605
  • Nina Nurmila UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Bambang Samsul Arifin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4190-8563
  • Karman Karman UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2021.182-14

Keywords:

Islamic History Content, Islamic Education textbook, Gender

Abstract

Schools are one of the most effective places to make humans free from all forms of oppression. Unfortunately, the textbooks used in schools contain a lot of gender inequality. This study aims to understand how the content of Islamic History in the Islamic Education textbook constructs gender which has implications for gender-based injustice. This study uses a qualitative approach with the method of critical discourse analysis by Norman Fairclough’s model. The primary data source used was all Islamic Education subject matters contained on the Islamic Education textbook at the Middle School level published by the Ministry of Education and Culture. The data collection technique used is the documentation technique with an in-depth reading mechanism. The findings reveal that there are four gender constructs contained in the Islamic History content, namely: (1) applying the patriarchal culture, (2) placing men as the main character, (3) prioritizing men existence and his roles, and (4) marginalizing the existence and role of women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahsan, M., & Sumiyati. (2017). Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti Kelas VIII (2nd ed.). Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud.

Ahsan, M., & Sumiyati. (2018). Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti Kelas IX (2nd ed.). Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud.

Ahsan, M., Sumiyati, & Mustahdi. (2019). Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti Kelas VII (6th ed.). Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud.

Al-Jada. (1987). Noble Women Around The Messenger. Om Elqura Publishing.

Badara, A. (2014). Analisis Wacana: Teori, Metode, dan Penerapannya pada Wacana Media. Kencana.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discouse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Rouledge.

Fakih, M. (2013). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar.

Harari, Y. N. (2017). Sapiens: Sejarah Ringkas Umat Manusia dari Zaman Batu hingga Perkiraan Kepunahannya. PT Pustaka Alvabet.

Haryatmoko. (2019). Critical Discourse Analysis (Analisis Wacana Kritis): Teori, Metodologi, dan Penerapan. Rajawali Pers.

Heywood, A. (2016). Ideologi Politik: Sebuah Pengantar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (2003). The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell Publishing.

Istiani, A., & Bakrun. (2011). Pendidikan Agama Islam untuk SMP Kelas VII. Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Kemdikbud. (2012). Kurikulum 2013. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemdikbud. (2017). Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti.

Kodir, F. A. (2019). Qirā’ah Mubādalah: Tafsir Progresif untuk Keadilan Gender dalam Islam. IRCiSoD.

Kodir, F. A., & Mukarnawati. (2008). Referensi bagi Hakim Peradilan Agama tentang Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga. Komnas Perempuan.

Leakey, R. (2019). Asal Usul Manusia. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Lubis, A. . (2016). Postmodernisme: Teori dan Metode. Rajawali Pers.

Maher, F. ., & Ward, J. . (2008). Gender and Teaching. Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Moen, P. (1989). Working Parent. University of Wisconsin Press.

Munfarida, E. (2014). Analisis Wacana Kritis dalam Perspektif Norman Fairclough. Komunika, 8, 1–19.

Murfi, A. (2014). Bias Gender dalam Buku Teks Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Kristen. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3, 267–287.

Nasution, A. G. . (2015). Bias Gender dalam Buku Pelajaran SKI Tingkat Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Nurfadlina. (2016). Bias Gender dalam Buku-Buku Teks Pendidikan Agama Islam: Analisis Konten pada Buku-Buku Teks Pendidikan Agama Islam Kelas XII SMA/SMK. UIN Sultan Maulana Hassanudin Banten.

Nuryaningsih, S., & Imanah, N. (2011). No TitlePendidikan Agama Islam untuk SMP Kelas VII. Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). Fifty Key Concepts in Gender Studies. Sage Publication.

Reed, E. (2019). Mitos Inferioritas Perempuan. Penerbit Independen.

Rizki, M. (2018). Analisis Buku Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti untuk SMP Perspektif Gender. UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.

Roded, R. (2018). Women in Islamic Biographical Collections: Form Ibn Sa’d to Who’s Who. Gorgias Press.

Rofiah, N. (2019). Qiraah Mubadalah Sebagai Syarat Tafsir Agama Adil Gender. In Qiraah Mubadalah: Tafsir Progresif untuk Keadilan Gender dalam Islam. IRCiSoD.

Sayeed, A. (2013). Women and The Transmission of Religious Knowledge in Islam. Cambridge University Press.

Sindhunata. (2019). Dilema Usaha Manusia Rasional: Teori Kritis Sekolah Frankfurt Max Horkheimer & Theodor W Adorno. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Siswati, E. (2017). Anatomi Teori Hegemoni Antonio Gramsci. Jurnal Translitera, 5, 11–33.

Sultana, A. (2010). Patriarchy and Women’s Subordination: A Theoretical Analysis. The Art Faculty Journal.

Suseno, F. . (2019). Kata Pengantar. In Dilema Usaha Manusia Rasional: Teori Kritis Sekolah Frankfurt Max Horkheimer & Theodor W Adorno. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Umar, N. (2001). Argumen Kesetaraan Gender Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Paramadina.

Zaprulkhan. (2018). Filsafat Modern Barat. IRCiSoD.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Wicaksono, M. J. A., Nurmila, N., Arifin, B. S., & Karman, K. (2021). Critical Discourse Analysis of Gender Construction on Islamic History Content in the Islamic Religious Education Textbook for Junior High School . Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 18(2), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2021.182-14