The Effect of Practical Methods on Results Students' Learning on The Material of Factors which Affects The Rate of Reaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jtcre.2026.81-01Keywords:
Practical Method, Learning Outcomes, Reaction RatesAbstract
The Practical Method of Learning provides students with the opportunity to engage directly by performing tasks themselves, following processes, observing a subject, analyzing, proving, and drawing their own conclusions about an object, condition, or specific process. This study aims to determine the effect of the method on students' learning outcomes in Chemistry at Public High School 1 Tambang. This research is a Quasi-Experimental study. The population consisted of all 80 students in the XI Science stream. The sample involved 60 students, with two classes used: Class XI MIPA 1 as the control class and Class XI MIPA 3 as the experimental class. Data collection techniques included observation, tests, and documentation. Data analysis was conducted using a t-test. Based on the t-test analysis results, it was found that t_calculated (-2.1) < t_table (2.045) at a 5% significance level. According to the paired sample t-test theory, the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted, and the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. From the research findings, it can be concluded that there is a significant effect on students' learning outcomes in Chemistry, specifically on the topic of reaction rates, between the experimental class and the control class at SMA Negeri 1 Tambang. The practical method of learning significantly influences students' academic performance.
Keywords: Practical Method, Learning Outcomes, Reaction Rates
References
Arikunto, S. (2013). Research Procedures: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2017). 2013 Curriculum Implementation Guide . Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Statistical Methods. Bandung: Tarsito.
Trianto. (2011). Integrated Learning Model. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education . New York: Viking Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Arends, RI (2008). Learning to Teach . New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education . New York: Macmillan.
Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education . New York: Viking Press.
Saripudin, S. (2014). Science Process Skills Based Learning . Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.
Schunk, D.H. (2009). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Arends, RI (2008). Learning to Teach . New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sardiman, AM (2001). Interaction and Motivation of Teaching and Learning . Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Trianto. (2007). Integrated Learning Model: Concept, Strategy, and Implementation in the School Level Curriculum (KTSP) . Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Siahaan, S. (2011). Chemistry Teaching and Learning Strategies Based on Practical Work . Bandung: UPI Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Widyastono, H. (2014). Curriculum Development in the Regional Autonomy Era . Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Setiawan, I. (2015). "The Effect of Practical Methods on Chemistry Learning Outcomes". Journal of Chemical Education , 3(2), 123-132.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theories of Instruction . New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, R. W. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model and 21st Century Skills . Colorado Springs: BSCS.
Sudjana, N. (2005). Learning Methods and Techniques in Schools . Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
.jpg){kind=small}
