Dari Esoteris ke Literal: Penafsiran ar-Rāzī terhadap Huruf Muqatṭa'ah dalam al-Qur'an
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/cq.v4i2.5682Keywords:
ar-Rāzī, Mafātiḥ al-Ghaib, Muqaṭṭa’ahAbstract
Discussions about the muqatṭa'ah letters in the Qur’an frequently exhibit a historical bias, focusing predominantly on their linguistic attributes rather than their symbolic or contextual significance. Consequently, many pre-modern mufassirsoften neglect the functional role these letter combinations play, as well as the importance of historical and symbolic contexts in their interpretation. This research seeks to investigate how ar-Rāzī, a prominent pre-modern mufassir, employed context as a key element in interpreting the muqatṭa'ah letters. To achieve this, the study adopts Norman Fairclough's critical discourse analysis framework, which facilitates an examination of the complex discourse within Mafātiḥ al-Ghaib. The study's findings present two primary conclusions. Firstly, ar-Rāzī uses the association between the muqatṭa'ah letters and the subsequent words to establish five interpretative trends: as an indicator of the book, a symbol of the revelation process, a demonstrative word (ism isyārah), a pronoun (ism ḍāmir), and a symbol of the events represented in the text. This method reinforces the argument that the Qur'anic verses beginning with muqatṭa'ah letters underline the identity of the Qur'an as a revelation. Secondly, ar-Rāzī employs an intertextual approach, integrating his interpretations with the historical and cognitive discourse of his era, particularly through the lens of Asy'ariyah theology, which he embraced. By doing so, ar-Rāzī merges objective elements, such as grammatical functions, with subjective components, focusing on divine authority in understanding revelation. This dual approach allows ar-Rāzī to present an interpretation of the muqatṭa'ah letters that encompasses both esoteric and literal aspects, portraying the Qur'an as a text that is rich in both symbolic and historical meaning.
References
Al-Baghawī, al-Ḥusayn bin Mas’ūd. Ma’ālim Al-Tanzīl Fī Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān. Bayrūt: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-’Arābī, 1420.
Al-Qurṭubī, Muḥammad bin Aḥmad. Al-Jāmi’ Li Aḥkām Al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risālah, 2006.
Ar-Rāzī, Fakr al-Dīn. Mafātiḥ Al-Ghayb. Bairut: Dār Iḥyā’ at-Turāṡ al-’Arābī, 1420.
Asror, Muhammad. “Makna Isyari Huruf Al-Muqatha’ah Dalam Tafsir ’Araisy Al-Bayan Karya Ruzbihan Baqli Al-Syiraz.” Institut PTIQ Jakarta, 2018.
Djuned, Muslim, and Makmunzir Makmunzir. “Penakwilan Ayat-Ayat Sifat Menurut Imam Fakhruddin Al-Razi.” TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies 6, no. 2 December 2021.
Eriyanto. Analisis Framing Konstruksi, Ideologi, Dan Politik Media. Yogyakarta: Lkis Yogyakarta, 2002.
Fairclough, Norman. “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 3, no. 2 April 1992.
———. Language and Power. London: Longman, 1989.
Halliday, Michael A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
İnce, Serkan. “‘Abd Al-Jabbar’s Apologetical Arguments Opposing Christian Christology: A Critical Analysis from the Viewpoint of Epistemological Argumentation Theory.” Nazariyat Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences 9, no. 1 April 2023.
Jorgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2002.
Kamal, Muzaki. “Tafsir Huruf Muqatta’ah Dalam Al-Qur’an (Studi Atas Penafsiran Al-Qusyairi Dalam Tafsir Laṭāif Al-Isyārāt).” IAIN Syekh Nurjati, 2022.
Karuniawan, Muhayat. “Makna Surat Haw Ammim Menurut Az-Zamakhsyari (Studi I’Jaz Al-Qur’ann Dalam Tafsirr Al-Kasysyaff).” UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2009.
Mansur, Mohammad. Tafsir Mafatih Al Gaib (Historisitas Dan Metodologi). Yogyakarta: Lintang Hayuning Buwana, 2019.
Munfarida, Elya. “Analisis Wacana Kritis Dalam Perspektif Norman Fairclough.” KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi 8, no. 1 January 2014.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Intelektual Islam: Teologi,Filsafat Dan Gnosis. Translated by Suharsono; Jamaluddin MZ. Yogyakarta: CIIS Press, 1995.
Roma Wijaya. “Pemaknaan Huruf-Huruf MuqaṬṬa’ah Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Pappasang 4, no. 2 December 2022.
Sumarti, Endang. “Analisis Wacana Kritis: Metode Analisis Dalam Perspektif Norman Fairclough.” Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia 2, no. 2 November 2010.
Watt, W. Montgomery. Pengantar Studi Al-Qur’an. Translated by Taufik Adnan Amal. Jakarta: CV Rajawali, 1991.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laily Salsabila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.