Contemporary Quran is a biannual, peer-reviewed, trilingual international journal dedicated to the advancement of contemporary Quranic studies. The journal publishes high-quality original research articles that reflect the diversity of methodologies and approaches in the field. Accepting submissions in Bahasa Indonesia, English, and Arabic, Contemporary Quran aims to facilitate scholarly exchange and bridge intellectual traditions between Muslim and Western academic scholarship. It serves as a platform for interdisciplinary and cross-cultural studies of the Quran. The journal focuses on innovative research, critical analysis, and new perspectives on the Quran, including contributions from scholars across the Muslim world as well as works produced within global academic contexts. Editor in Chief: Prof. Dr. phil. Sahiron Syamsuddin, M.A. Managing Editor: Dr. Muhammad Akmaluddin, M.S.I. ISSN: 2798-7108 (online) | 2798-7248 (print) Frequency: 2 issues a year (January-June; July-December) Acceptance Rate: 15% Citation Analysis: Google Scholar | Garuda | Sinta | Crossref
Dari Postmodernisme ke Dekolonialitas: Kritik atas Wacana Tafsir Gender dalam Kajian Al-Qur’an Kontemporer melalui Pembacaan QS. 4:34 dalam Tafsir Awal
This article examines the discourse of gender exegesis in contemporary Qur’anic studies through a decolonial critique of Islamic feminist epistemology, focusing on the interpretation of Q. 4:34 within the early exegetical tradition. It departs from the thesis that Islamic feminism, while significantly contributing to the deconstruction of patriarchal interpretations, continues to operate within a postcolonial horizon that risks reproducing the coloniality of knowledge. Employing hermeneutical tools such as historical contextualization, intra-textual reading, and a tawhidic paradigm, Islamic feminism advances an egalitarian moral vision of the Qur’an and interprets gender hierarchy as a product of exegetical construction. However, this project also entails epistemological tensions, as it often marginalizes pre-modern exegesis as a residue of patriarchy and promotes an anachronistic reading that evaluates Islamic tradition through modern ethical standards. Through a decolonial lens, this study repositions early tafsir as a legitimate and authoritative hermeneutical partner by demonstrating that classical exegetes possessed coherent methodological foundations and articulated a rational pre-modern moral cosmology within their historical context. In interpreting Q. 4:34, gender relations in early Muslim society are understood as structured upon ethical responsibility and God-consciousness, wherein men and women perform distinct yet complementary roles in a just framework. Accordingly, this article argues that the decolonization of Qur’anic studies necessitates the restoration of the epistemic authority of the classical exegetical tradition.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nafisatul Mu'awwanah, Iffah Al Walidah http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Transmisi Keilmuan dan Jaringan Ulama Tafsir Al-Qur’an Sumatera Selatan Abad 18-20 H
Penelitian ini mengkaji tradisi tafsir Al-Qur’an di Sumatera Selatan dengan fokus pada pola transmisi keilmuan, manuskrip lokal, dan genealogi intelektual ulama tafsir dari abad ke-18 hingga abad ke-20 Masehi. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pola transmisi keilmuan tafsir dari ulama Timur Tengah ke ulama lokal Sumatera Selatan, bagaimana manuskrip tafsir lokal mencerminkan tradisi penafsiran yang adaptif terhadap konteks sosial-budaya, serta peran genealogi intelektual ulama dalam membentuk jaringan transmisi keilmuan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kualitatif historis-hermeneutik, memadukan analisis filologi dan studi jaringan intelektual. Data diperoleh dari manuskrip tafsir lokal, termasuk karya Masagus Muzammil, Ahmad al-Habsyi, dan KH. Fahrurrozi Seribandung, serta dokumen sejarah terkait ulama dan Kesultanan Palembang. Analisis menelusuri pola penyebaran tafsir, struktur jaringan guru-murid, serta karakteristik tekstual dan fisik manuskrip. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa transmisi keilmuan berlangsung melalui jaringan guru-murid yang terstruktur antara ulama lokal dan ulama dari Aceh, Hadramaut, dan Haramain. Manuskrip lokal menggunakan bahasa Melayu Palembang dan aksara Jawi, menunjukkan adaptasi terhadap konteks lokal, sedangkan karya KH. Fahrurrozi mempertahankan bahasa Arab untuk menjaga otoritas klasik. Genealogi intelektual ulama membentuk jaringan luas yang memungkinkan pengetahuan tafsir ditransmisikan lintas generasi dan menjaga kontinuitas tradisi keilmuan, bahkan tanpa selalu menghasilkan karya tulis baru. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa tradisi tafsir Sumatera Selatan menampilkan perpaduan antara konservasi otoritas klasik dan adaptasi lokal, sekaligus memperlihatkan kapasitas ulama dalam membangun jaringan epistemik yang kokoh dan berkelanjutan.
Copyright (c) 2026 Reli Sulyani, Muhajirin, Nyimas Umi Kalsum, M. Riyan Hidayat http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Hudūd dalam Al-Qur’an: Pembacaan Ulang Hermeneutik atas Hukuman Seratus Cambukan dalam QS. An-Nūr [24]: 2-3
The Qur’ānic prescription of one-hundred lashes for fornication in QS An-Nūr 24:2–3 has long provoked tension between classical Islamic jurisprudence and contemporary human-rights norms. Existing commentary, dominated by fiqh-centric, atomistic readings, often neglects the socio-historical matrix that shaped the verse and, consequently, its moral telos. This study reinterprets the passage through Fazlur Rahman’s double-movement hermeneutic within a qualitative research design. Primary data comprise pre-Islamic records of flogging, early, medieval, and modern tafsīr, and statutory applications of ḥ udūd; secondary data derive from recent scholarship on Islamic criminal law and international human-rights law. The first hermeneutic movement reconstructs the historical landscape of corporal punishment from Ancient Rome to early Madīnah, revealing the lash as a socially intelligible deterrent rather than a sacralised ritual. The second movement distils a universal moral ideal—social protection through deterrence—and tests its compatibility with modern human-rights principles. Findings show that the ethical objective of An-Nūr 24:2–3 can be upheld today through non-violent, educational, and restorative measures that respect bodily integrity while preserving the Qur’ān’s preventive intent. The study thus offers a viable framework for reconciling Islamic normative authority with contemporary humanitarian standards
Copyright (c) 2025 Nisrina Tuhfatul Azizha, Naqiyah Naqiyah http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Interpretation of Surah Al-Fatihah verse 5 in Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Historically Effected Consciousness and the Construction of National Values
This study examines the nationalistic interpretation of Surah al-Fatihah, verse 5, in M. Quraish Shihab’s Tafsir Al-Mishbah, highlighting its historical background and transformative implications for the relationship between religion and nationalism in contemporary Indonesia. Unlike classical exegetes who relatively emphasize the theological-ritualistic dimension, Quraish Shihab interprets na’budu as a representation of collective consciousness that transcends individual worship toward social solidarity and national responsibility. This interpretation is explicitly linked to the second principle of Pancasila, namely “Just and Civilized Humanity.”Using Hans-Georg Gadamer’s hermeneutical framework, particularly the concept of historically effected consciousness, this study argues that Quraish Shihab’s interpretation cannot be separated from his historical horizon and ideological consciousness as an Indonesian Muslim intellectual. This study is a qualitative literature review that analyzes primary sources, namely the Al-Mishbah exegesis and other works by Quraish Shihab, supported by relevant secondary literature.The results of the study indicate that Quraish Shihab’s interpretation constitutes a dialogue between the Qur’anic text and the pluralistic social reality of Indonesia. The emphasis on the values of solidarity, humanity, and nationalism is not merely a development of textual meaning but a reflection of an ideological commitment to harmonizing Islamic teachings with the Indonesian framework. This interpretation has transformative implications by reconstructing the relationship between religion and nationalism from a dichotomous paradigm into a mutually reinforcing one. Thus, Quraish Shihab’s interpretation serves not only as an intellectual product but also as an ideological instrument that promotes inclusive religiosity, strengthens social cohesion, and affirms the compatibility between Islam and national identity in the context of contemporary Indonesia.
Copyright (c) 2025 Al-Faiz Muhammad Rabbany Tarman, Indal Abror, Riva Ferdiana Nasywa Az Zahra http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Modernitas dan Konteks Sosial dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an: Studi Komparatif QS. Al-Baqarah [2]: 256 dalam Tafsir Al-Manār dan Tafsir Al-Azhar
This article aims to comparatively examine the interpretation of QS. Al-Baqarah [2]:256 in two influential modern tafsir works: Tafsir al-Manār and Tafsir al-Azhar. The analysis focuses on their methodological approaches, social contexts, and discursive orientations. Employing a comparative-hermeneutic framework and contextual discourse analysis, this study finds that although both interpretations reject religious coercion, they exhibit significantly different interpretive styles and argumentative strategies. Al-Manār employs a rational-philosophical and apologetic approach, clearly targeting intellectuals, reformists, and a global readership amid the 20th-century Islamic reform movement in Egypt. In contrast, al-Azhar emphasizes psychological, contextual, and populist dimensions, aiming at the general public, students, and local Indonesian figures in the post-colonial era. These findings underscore that tafsir is not merely the result of textual understanding but also a dynamic expression of the interplay between text, interpreter, and socio-cultural context. This study offers a valuable contribution to strengthening religious moderation through Qur’anic interpretation studies.
Copyright (c) 2026 Moh Firdaus HN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Dari Penafsiran Yang Keras Ke Lembut: Kontekstualisasi QS. at-Taubah [9]: 5 Melalui Lensa Double Movement Fazlur Rahman
QS. At-Taubah [9]: 5 has often been interpreted literally by classical exegetes and some modern commentators as a command to kill polytheists, thereby giving the verse a tone of violence. Such interpretations tend to overlook the historical context and moral objectives of the verse, thus limiting the possibility of uncovering more contextual and ethical meanings. This study therefore seeks to reveal a more tolerant understanding of QS. at-Taubah [9]: 5 through Fazlur Rahman’s double movement hermeneutical approach. The main focus is to analyze the verse’s original meaning, the historical and sociological context at the time of its revelation, and how this approach can contextualize the verse so as to draw out the ethical values that have often been neglected in traditional exegesis. To achieve this aim, the research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method to examine QS. at-Taubah [9]: 5 through a hermeneutical lens, in order to uncover its potential for a more contextual meaning. The findings indicate that, textually, QS. at-Taubah [9]: 5 contains imperative forms such as “kill” and “capture.” However, from both linguistic and exegetical perspectives, these commands are contextual and directed solely toward polytheists who had violated a peace treaty. The verse was revealed after the conquest of Mecca, when the Muslim community had become the dominant power, and the command to fight was issued in response to threats posed by polytheist groups who had breached their commitments to peace. Through the hermeneutical framework, the meaning of this verse is contextualized so that it aligns with the ethical principles of Islam, which reject violence except in defense against a genuine threat. This study demonstrates that the verse commonly classified as an ayat qital (verse of fighting) does not, in fact, promote violence. Rather, it underscores values of justice, peace, and tolerance, principles that are fully consistent with the ideal of peaceful coexistence in modern societies such as Indonesia.
Copyright (c) 2026 Syarifah Zifa Putri Andini http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
The Integrative Model in Qur'anic Interpretation at UIN Sunan Kalijaga: A Contributory Analysis of the Ma'na-cum-Maghza and Maqasidi Approaches
This study examines the integrative model of Qur'anic interpretation developed at UIN Sunan Kalijaga, with a focus on the contributions of two contemporary approaches: ma'na-cum-maghza and maqasidi. These approaches represent scholarly efforts to merge textual meaning with contextual relevance in understanding the message of the Qur'an. The ma'na-cum-maghza approach emphasizes uncovering the deeper meanings behind the text, while the maqasidi approach centers on the universal objectives and values that sharia aims to realize. Through a literature review and analysis of academic works produced at UIN Sunan Kalijaga, this study demonstrates that the integrative model not only enriches tafsir methodology but also offers a more adaptive response to the challenges of the modern era. As such, this model makes a significant contribution to the development of a contextual, relevant, and transformative Qur'anic interpretation.
Copyright (c) 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Legal Reconstruction of Marriage Dispensations in Indonesia through a Theo-Juridical Approach in the Perspective of the Qur'an
The Legal Reconstruction of Marriage Dispensation in Indonesia through a Theo-Juridical Approach in the Perspective of the Qur’an aims to re-examine the practice of underage marriage within the context of Islamic law, particularly from the perspective of the Qur’an, and to recommend a form of legal reconstruction within the Indonesian legal system. Child marriage remains a persistent legal and social phenomenon across various regions in Indonesia, despite the revision of the minimum marriageable age through Law Number 16 of 2019. A legal loophole in the form of marriage dispensation, as stated in Article 7 paragraph (2), creates room for practices that contradict the principles of child protection. This study employs a normative-juridical method and thematic (maudhū‘i) interpretation of Qur’anic verses related to marriage, family responsibility, and child protection. The findings indicate that the Qur’an emphasizes not only biological readiness but also intellectual maturity (rushd) as an ideal requirement for marriage. The practice of marriage dispensation is considered inconsistent with maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, particularly in the aspects of protecting life, intellect, lineage, and the dignity of children. This paper recommends legal reconstruction that includes statutory reform, strengthening of law enforcement structures, and transformation of legal culture in society based on Qur’anic values.
Copyright (c) 2025 Aisyatul Azizah, Fina Wardani, Siti Khodijah Nurul Aula http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Antara Rasionalisasi dan Spekulasi: Tinjauan atas Pembacaan Kontemporer Kisah-Kisah al-Qur’an versi Muḥammad Syaḥrūr
Tulisan ini membahas konsep pembacaan kontemporer terhadap kisah-kisah dalam al-Qur’an menurut Muḥammad Syaḥrūr, seorang pemikir Islam progresif yang menekankan pentingnya pendekatan rasional dan ilmiah dalam memahami teks al-Qur’an. Fokus kajian ini tertuju pada tiga asumsi dasar dalam pembacaan Syaḥrūr: (1) analisis linguistik berdasarkan ketergantungan pada teks al-Qur’an, (2) kecenderungan menyelaraskan makna teks dengan sains modern, dan (3) asumsi mengenai evolusi wahyu antar generasi para nabi. Dengan studi kasus pada kisah Nabi Nūḥ a.s., tulisan ini menunjukkan bagaimana Syaḥrūr mengonstruksi penafsiran ayat-ayat kisah ini untuk mendukung tesis evolusi risalah, mulai dari ketidakhadiran formalisasi syariat, rasionalisasi mukjizat, hingga pentakwilan usia Nabi Nūḥ. Kajian ini menggunakan metode elaborative-kritsi terhadap karya Syaḥrūr tentan tema ini. Ditemukan bahwa meskipun menawarkan pembacaan progresif, interpretasi Syaḥrūr tidak luput dari jebakan spekulasi historis dan dramatisasi saintifik yang justru menggeser kesetiaannya terhadap ketergantungan pada teks al-Qur’an.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Mu'is, A. Muhtadi Ridwan, Misbahul Munir, Nur Asnawi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Semiotika Kiblat: Analisis Peircean terhadap Tafsir At-Tanwir Muhammadiyah
The significance of this study lies in the understanding that the concept of the qibla in Islam is not merely a geographical direction but a symbol of identity, unity, and spiritual orientation for Muslims. In the modern era, the interpretation of the qibla faces challenges due to the developments in science, culture, and societal dynamics. The material object of this research is the concept of the qibla as interpreted in Tafsir At-Tanwir, while the formal object is the semiotic analysis of Charles Sanders Peirce, which views signs as a triadic relationship between the representamen, object, and interpretant. This study aims to uncover the profound meanings of the qibla concept through a comprehensive semiotic approach. The research employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical method with Peirce's semiotic theory as the analytical framework. Primary data are derived from Tafsir At-Tanwir, authored by the Muhammadiyah Council for Tarjih and Tajdid, while secondary data include literature on semiotics, Quranic exegesis, and socio-cultural studies related to the concept of the qibla. The analytical technique involves identifying the three core elements of a sign—representamen, object, and interpretant—and exploring their interrelations within historical, social, and theological contexts. The findings reveal that the qibla concept in Tafsir At-Tanwir is interpreted in multiple dimensions: as the direction of worship, the exclusive identity of Muslims, a symbol of an egalitarian social system, and an instrument for shaping the ideal personality of an Islamic society.
Haringun Trisiwi Adhi Rachmawati Trisiwi Adhi
Copyright (c) 2025 Gaes Rizka Nugraha Nugraha, Haringun Trisiwi Adhi Rachmawati Trisiwi Adhi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Angelika Neuwirth's Feminist Hermeneutics of Q.S. Āli 'Imrān (3): 7: The Interpretation of Mutasyābihāt Verses and Muḥkamāt Verses
The reading of Q.S. Āli 'Imrān (3): 7, especially in relation to mutasyābihāt verses (similar, vague, similar to one another, cannot stand alone) and muḥkamāt verses (definite, firm, clear), generally have nothing to do with gender issues. With a critical approach, especially literary and historical approaches, Angelika Neuwirth presents a different interpretation, which implicitly displays the Hermeneutics of Feminism, where muḥkamāt verses and mutasyābihāt verses can be positioned as a discourse of gender equality. This research aims to develop the muḥkamāt-mutasyābihāt theory from Angelika Neuwirth's perspective. The method used is the “qualitative grounded theory” method. The research data is obtained through library research, which is taken from data sources in the form of writings or statements of Angelika Neuwirth regarding Q.S. Āli 'Imrān (3): 7, as well as data from other sources related to muḥkamāt-mutasyābihāt verses. The data collected were then analyzed and interpreted in such a way. The results show that the reading of Q.S. Āli 'Imrān (3): 7 is closely related to feminist hermeneutics, and therefore has evolved.
Copyright (c) 2025 Wildan Fahdika Ahmad http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Framing Ayat-Ayat Pernikahan Dalam Podcast The Sungkars: Analisis Tren Marriage Is Scary Di Era Digital
Copyright (c) 2025 ermayaza, Fathima Rantissia Zein http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Abu Hayyân's Interpretation of the Verses of Law (Study of the Verse of the Relationship between Husband and Wife in Verse Qs. Al-Baqarah [2]: 222)
This research examines Abu Hayyan's methodology in the tafsir 'al-Bahr al-Muhit,' especially in interpreting QS. Al-Baqarah [2]: 222, by comparing mutawatir and shādzdzah qirât. Abu Hayyan's approach highlights the interaction between qirât and legal interpretation and compares it with other scholars to assess his contribution to Islamic jurisprudence. This study is qualitative research using descriptive-analytical methods. It analyses Abu Hayyan's interpretation, especially in his work al-Bahr al-Muhit, by comparing the different interpretations of other scholars to gain a broader insight. This study concludes that Abu Hayyân succeeded in showing that qirât syâdzdzah can be used to interpret the Qur'an. Qirât shâdzdzah can be compromised with qirât mutawatir to provide a more holistic interpretation in the study of interpretation and Islamic jurisprudence.
Copyright (c) 2025 Romlah Widayati, Saepullah http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Reintepretasi terhadap Ayat-Ayat Khamr dalam Al-Qur’an: Analisis Intertekstual Julia Kristeva
It is known that the problem of alcoholic beverages has been prevalent in the past and is still prevalent today. This action leads to many bad things that can damage yourself and cause others. This article seeks to give new thoughts on real or existing problems in the Qur'an. Efforts to explore or analyze the text of the Qur'an, especially discussing alcohol, can be reviewed from a literary (language) perspective, also known as semiotics. This research wants to see how the role of Julia Kristeva's semiotics with its intertextuality approach theory to reveal and trace from one text to another related to the discussion being studied. So it takes a type of qualitative research that is literature in which the collection of data is taken from books, scientific works, especially those related to liquor. The purpose of applying Julia Kristeva's intertextuality theory is to analyze the data that has been collected in order to reveal the transformations, modifications and parallels that occur from all texts. The results obtained from Julia Kristeva's intertextuality theory regarding liquor. There are transformations, modifications and parallels that occur in the three verses about liquor, namely QS. Al-Baqarah (2): 219, QS. An-Nisa' (4): 43 and QS. Al-Ma'idah (5): 90-91. The first verse warns that intoxicants contain many evils and harms. The second verse explains that it is not recommended to pray while drunk. It is known that the habits of the Arab community at that time could not be separated from liquor, even when they wanted to pray. This is the transformation and modification that occurs in the first verse to the second verse. The parallel is known in the previous two verses and this third verse both discuss liquor, but in this verse there is a meaning of confirmation of the prohibition of liquor.
Copyright (c) 2022 Reno Yulianda http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Mengurai Kontroversi Kafir: Konteks Historis dan Linguistik QS. At-Taubah [9]: 5
The debate over changing the term kafir to non-Muslim has become a prominent issue in Indonesia in recent years. This study aims to uncover the contextual meaning behind the interpretation of QS. At-Taubah: 5, which is central to this debate. Utilizing a contextual approach, the research focuses on both linguistic and historical analyses of QS. At-Taubah: 5. Linguistically, this verse is often quoted out of context by hardline Muslim groups without considering its connection to the surrounding verses, as well as related verses such as QS. al-Anfal 54-58. Historically, the verse is closely linked to the context of war arising from treaty violations. In pre-Islamic Arab society, war was a deeply ingrained part of the culture, and this verse specifically addresses conflicts triggered by treaty violations by certain groups, rather than targeting all polytheists. The findings suggest that the relevance of QS. At-Taubah: 5 needs to be reconsidered in the modern context, especially given that wars are now infrequent, particularly in Indonesia. Furthermore, the categorization of infidels is likely to evolve over time in response to changing societal norms and political dynamics. A reinterpretation using a contextual approach can provide a clearer understanding of the verse and help prevent its misuse to justify acts of violence.
Copyright (c) 2022 Tubagus Syafiq Taftazani http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Ideologi dalam Bahasa Mufasir: Analisis Marji’ al-Ḍamir pada Tafsir al-Kasysyāf Karya az-Zamakhsyari
The methodology can be used in the interpretation of the Qur'an is ra’y, means ijtihad. In order to produce a correct methodologically interpretation, ra’y should be accompanied by certain requirements and methodological steps, such as knowing the rules of interpretation and linguistic sciences. Al-Kasysyaf is one of many interpretation books have been criticized by the strong ideological tendencies of its commentator. It can be seen in the interpretation of verses which have ideological content. Since Al-Zamakhsyari, the commentator, was also known by his expertise in language and literature, it raises a question, what if the verses contain ideology are not possible to be interpreted according to i’tizal when follows the rules of linguistic? This question is what the author intends to examine. This study aims to the implementation of the rule of marji‘ al-dlamir in verses mention the word man yasya’. After using both linguistic approach and theological approach to determine the direction of the interpretation produced by Al-Zamakhsyari, the study found that the rule of marji‘ al-dlamir is still applied thoroughly. However, the result of interpretation still has the nuance of i’tizal because of the takwil used by Al-Zamakhsyari.
Copyright (c) 2022 Nor Lutfi Fais, Ahmad Musyafiq http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Dari al-Qur’an ke Hizbut Tahrir: Evolusi Makna Khilafah dalam Pemikiran Taqiyuddin al-Nabhani
The concept of khilafah in Islamic thought has sparked considerable debate and conflict, particularly following the rise of the Hizbut Tahrir (HT) movement, which advocates for the establishment of a global Islamic government based on Taqiyuddin al-Nabhani's interpretation of khilafah. This study aims to trace the evolution of the meaning of khilafah from its origins in the Qur'an to its modern interpretation by al-Nabhani. Utilizing Julia Kristeva's intertextuality approach, the study explores how these changes in meaning occur and identifies the sources that have influenced al-Nabhani's thought. The findings indicate that the concept of khilafah in the Qur'an fundamentally denotes representation, applicable to both humans as God's vicegerents on earth and within a governmental framework. Nevertheless, the Qur'an does not provide explicit, detailed guidelines regarding the khilafah as a system of governance. Al-Nabhani reinterprets khilafah as a government founded on Islamic Shari'ah, structured around four primary pillars, and intended to have a global reach. The study reveals significant shifts in the meaning of khilafah, characterized by processes of transformation, modification, and expansion, reflecting the context and ideological perspectives that al-Nabhani introduces. These shifts are marked by the ideologeme of transposition, illustrating the adaptation of the concept to fit new ideological frameworks and contexts.
Copyright (c) 2022 Khusnul Khotim, Maharani Wulandari http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Nilai-Nilai Resiprokal dalam Moderasi Beragama: Analisis Qirā’ah Mubādalah terhadap QS. Al-Baqarah [2]: 143
Moderasi beragama adalah suatu keniscayaan yang harus diwujudkan di Indonesia, mengingat pluralitas agama merupakan landasan fundamental berdirinya bangsa ini. Moderasi ini tidak hanya relevan dalam konteks sosial, tetapi juga esensial untuk menjaga stabilitas nasional dan keharmonisan antar umat beragama. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi nilai-nilai resiprokal dalam moderasi beragama sebagaimana diisyaratkan dalam QS. Al-Baqarah: 143. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan Qirā’ah Mubādalah yang dikembangkan oleh Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir, yang menekankan penafsiran yang inklusif dan berkeadilan. Pendekatan ini tidak hanya menekankan penafsiran egaliter antara laki-laki dan perempuan, tetapi juga dapat diaplikasikan untuk mengidentifikasi nilai-nilai kesalingan dalam teks-teks keagamaan, yang menjadi landasan penting dalam upaya mempromosikan toleransi dan penghormatan antar umat beragama. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa QS. Al-Baqarah: 143 mengandung dua nilai resiprokal yang mendukung moderasi beragama: pertama, nilai saling menghormati antar pemeluk agama; kedua, nilai menjaga kerukunan antar umat beragama. Kedua nilai ini memperkuat argumen bahwa moderasi beragama bukan hanya sebuah konsep teoretis, tetapi juga merupakan bagian integral dari ajaran Islam yang perlu diimplementasikan dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat di Indonesia. Lebih jauh, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa moderasi beragama, sebagaimana diuraikan dalam Al-Qur'an, adalah solusi efektif untuk menangkal ekstremisme dan radikalisme yang dapat mengancam kohesi sosial di Indonesia.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ahmad Murtaza MZ, Satria Tenun Syahpurta http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Intertekstualitas Tafsir: Mengungkap Keterpengaruhan Anwār at-Tanzīl terhadap Al-Kasysyāf dalam Pemaknaan Kata Auliya
The interpretation of the word auliya in Islamic exegesis is a significant issue because it is linked to concepts of loyalty, friendship, and leadership within a religious framework. The classical tafsir works, Anwar at-Tanzil and al-Kasysyāf, provide differing perspectives on the meaning of auliya. This article seeks to bridge this gap by examining the interpretation of auliya in Anwar at-Tanzil and al-Kasysyāf and tracing the influence of one upon the other using Julia Kristeva's intertextuality approach. Employing a thematic method, this study focuses specifically on the meaning of auliyaas its primary subject of analysis. The findings reveal that al-Baiḍawī's interpretation of auliya is heavily influenced by the earlier interpretation found in al-Kasysyāf. Through Kristeva's intertextuality framework, it becomes evident that the principles of parallelism, modification, and expansion or haplology play a dominant role in this influence. The prevalence of these principles points to a tendency towards transposition as an ideologeme, marked by the inclusion of elements of addition, subtraction, adjustment, and the reorganization of ideas in al-Baiḍawī's interpretation of auliya.
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Fauzi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Persepsi Ketuhanan dalam Tiga Agama: Analisis Komparatif terhadap al-Qur’an, Bible, dan Regweda
Berbicara hal terkait ketuhanan atau konsep Tuhan banyak aspek yang perlu diulas lebih mendalam. Hal ini sangat diperlukan untuk mencari eksistensi agama dan kepercayaan dalam beragama. Tulisan ini berusaha mengungkap hal tersebut, dengan fokus kajian terkait bagaimana Konsep Tuhan itu dilihat dari persepektif tiga agama yaitu Islam, Hindu, dan Kristen serta bagaimana eksistensi Tuhan dilihat dari Teori Antropomorfisme dan Transenden-Imanen. Dari penjelasan dan penjabaran yang ada, didapatkan hasil bahwa disimpulkan bahwa dari setiap agama itu memiliki konsep Tuhan masing-masing, dimana konsep tersebut tidak dapat disamakan satu dengan lainnya. Kristen memandang Tuhan dengan konsep Trinitas, yaitu memandang Tuhan dengan tiga wujud-Nya, yaitu Tuhan Anak, Tuhan Bapak, dan Roh Kudus. Sedangkan Islam menganggap Tuhan sebagai sosok yang Esa, tiada Tuhan Selain Allah. Bahkan, Ia tidak beranak dan juga tidak diperanakkan. Kemudian jika dilihat dari perspektif Hindu di sebut Brahman/ Isa. Penyebutan Isa di sini Īśā. Īśā adalah jiwa dari seluruh alam semesta, yaitu Tuhan Yang Maha Pencipta, asal dan kembalinya alam semesta dan beserta isinya. Kemudian konsep tersebut dilihat dari perspektif ketiga terori, maka akan menhasilkan pemahaman yang berbeda-beda.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ayu Novita Sari http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Menggali Makna di Balik Teks: Analisis Hermeneutika QS. Āli 'Imrān [3]: 118-120 untuk Dialog Antaragama
This study aims to analyze the interpretation of QS. Āli 'Imrān [3]: 118-120 within the context of inter-religious relations, particularly between Muslims and non-Muslims, utilizing Jorge J.E. Gracia's hermeneutical approach. The research is grounded in the observed ambivalence within the Qur'anic verses concerning interactions with non-Muslims, which advocate for tolerance and dialogue on one hand, while seemingly imposing limitations on interaction on the other. This study employs a qualitative approach, adopting a literature review method that involves text analysis and draws on both primary and secondary sources, including books, journal articles, and other academic works. Gracia’s theory, which highlights the significance of socio-historical context in textual interpretation, serves as the primary analytical framework. The findings suggest that a literal interpretation of QS. Āli 'Imrān [3]: 118-120, which appears to restrict relations with non-Muslims, often fails to account for the historical and contextual circumstances surrounding the revelation of the verse. A hermeneutical approach indicates that such restrictions should be understood within the socio-political context of early Islam, rather than as universal principles applicable to all contexts. These insights contribute significantly to fostering a more inclusive and contextually relevant understanding of interfaith relations, particularly within contemporary societies that are increasingly pluralistic and interconnected on a global scale.
Copyright (c) 2022 Maghfiratuzzahroh Maghfiratuzzahroh http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Kontekstualisasi Konsep Moderat dalam Al-Qur’an: Analisis QS. Al-Baqarah [2]:143
This study explores the issue of religious moderation in Indonesia, particularly within the context of QS. al-Baqarah [2]: 143, a verse frequently cited as foundational to the concept of moderation. Amidst the ongoing political climate, the issue of intolerance has become increasingly pertinent, exacerbated by the rise of social media and the influence of political buzzers who often distort information for specific agendas. The research aims to explore how the concept of religious moderation is interpreted by the community and how this interpretation is shaped from textual sources to everyday practices. Employing Hans-Georg Gadamer's hermeneutic method, the study analyzes the term “ummatan wasaṭan” in QS. al-Baqarah [2]: 143, with a focus on the socio-historical context of the text's revelation and its relevance to contemporary life. The findings reveal that the public's understanding of religious moderation is frequently misconstrued as either passive or inflexible, whereas it should be comprehended as embodying fairness and balance. Through descriptive-analytical text analysis, the study concludes that religious moderation, consistent with Gadamer's theory, involves an interplay between the horizon of the text and the horizon of the reader, facilitating a deeper and more contextually relevant understanding of the text in the present day.
Copyright (c) 2022 Faiz Wildan Mustofa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Dari Esoteris ke Literal: Penafsiran ar-Rāzī terhadap Huruf Muqatṭa'ah dalam al-Qur'an
Discussions about the muqatṭa'ah letters in the Qur’an frequently exhibit a historical bias, focusing predominantly on their linguistic attributes rather than their symbolic or contextual significance. Consequently, many pre-modern mufassirsoften neglect the functional role these letter combinations play, as well as the importance of historical and symbolic contexts in their interpretation. This research seeks to investigate how ar-Rāzī, a prominent pre-modern mufassir, employed context as a key element in interpreting the muqatṭa'ah letters. To achieve this, the study adopts Norman Fairclough's critical discourse analysis framework, which facilitates an examination of the complex discourse within Mafātiḥ al-Ghaib. The study's findings present two primary conclusions. Firstly, ar-Rāzī uses the association between the muqatṭa'ah letters and the subsequent words to establish five interpretative trends: as an indicator of the book, a symbol of the revelation process, a demonstrative word (ism isyārah), a pronoun (ism ḍāmir), and a symbol of the events represented in the text. This method reinforces the argument that the Qur'anic verses beginning with muqatṭa'ah letters underline the identity of the Qur'an as a revelation. Secondly, ar-Rāzī employs an intertextual approach, integrating his interpretations with the historical and cognitive discourse of his era, particularly through the lens of Asy'ariyah theology, which he embraced. By doing so, ar-Rāzī merges objective elements, such as grammatical functions, with subjective components, focusing on divine authority in understanding revelation. This dual approach allows ar-Rāzī to present an interpretation of the muqatṭa'ah letters that encompasses both esoteric and literal aspects, portraying the Qur'an as a text that is rich in both symbolic and historical meaning.
Copyright (c) 2024 Laily Salsabila http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Turaṡ, Geografi, dan Aransemen Kronologis: Studi Tafsir Nuzūlī dan Kesadaran Historis Mufasir
This study is driven by the variations in the chronological arrangement of the Qur'an among different nuzūlī tafsirs, reflecting the reasoning systems of interpreters in engaging with the turaṡ tradition. The aim of this research is to explore how geographical contexts shape the reasoning and awareness of mufasirs regarding the discourse on Qur'anic historicity. Utilizing a literature review method, the study examines five nuzūlī tafsirs as primary sources, complemented by relevant secondary research. Foucault's theoretical framework and comparative media analysis are employed to investigate the interactions among nuzūlī tafsirs concerning the Qur'an's chronological arrangement, aiming to uncover the underlying factors behind these differences. The findings reveal that historical awareness and the concept of tartīb al-nuzūl in the modern era have led interpreters to reexamine the chronological debates of the Qur'an. Interpreters from the Arab-Syrian context tend to adopt the turaṡ reasoning system to uphold Islamic identity within the global intellectual landscape, while Al-Jābirī, drawing from the French philosophical tradition, critiques this historical reliance through a deconstructive lens. This epistemic confrontation indicates that discussions on the Qur'an's chronological arrangement remain pertinent for reconstruction, with geographical knowledge significantly influencing the diverse reasoning of interpreters.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aziz Bashor Pratama http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Ketika al-Qur’an Bertemu Modernitas: Penerimaan Pemikir Kontemporer Islam dalam Konteks Kebebasan Beragama
The renewal concepts offered by contemporary Indonesian thinkers on actual issues involve legitimizing their views through the Quran. The approach of validating these issues, such as religious freedom, using various Quranic verses showcases a range of interpretations that can appear subjective and arbitrary. This research seeks to uncover the dialectical relationship between contemporary Indonesian thinkers, specifically Nurcholis Madjid, Abdurrahman Wahid, and Djohan Effendi, and the Quran, which forms a response of meaning to address current issues. Employing a qualitative methodology, the study utilizes Hans Robert Jauss’reception theory for data analysis. The findings indicate that the tendency to use the Qur'an in addressing actual issues is grounded in the compatibility of meaning, using the keywords within the verses that align with the issues being discussed. When suitable keywords are identified in a verse, they are interpreted with a dominance of the initial impression of understanding, primarily based on their linguistic meanings. This uniformity in meaning perception, which emphasizes objective meaning through language, is then applied to the contemporary context. The perception of liberal interpretation arises because the traditional interpretative moment, which mediates various perspectives of past interpreters, is often bypassed. As a result, these interpretative efforts cannot be fully categorized under the concept of contextual interpretation. However, the determination of objective meaning through textual analysis, extended to a new context that incorporates the subjective experiences of each thinker, makes this understanding mechanism not as subjective as commonly assumed.
Copyright (c) 2024 Moh. Arif Rakman Hakim http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Transformasi Nāsikh-Mansūkh dalam Pandangan as-Suyūṭī: Respons terhadap Dinamika Sosial dan Kebutuhan Masyarakat
As-Suyūṭī’s reconstruction of the nāsikh-mansūkh concept responds to shifts in social and historical contexts, aiming to maintain its relevance and applicability for Muslims. This study seeks to explore his stance on nāsikh-mansūkh by linking it to the legal reform mechanisms he developed. Utilizing a qualitative method within a sociology of knowledge framework, the research found that as-Suyūṭī’s understanding of nāsikh-mansūkh emerged from synthesizing previous thoughts, adapted to meet the needs of his era. As-Suyūṭī saw nāsikh-mansūkh as a concept born out of the evolving needs for new laws due to contextual changes. This perspective underpinned his argument for issuing various fatwas. This approach took shape in a society facing degradation in various aspects, necessitating new laws to address emerging needs. His pragmatic way of thinking was driven by the specific needs of his time, leading him to reconceptualize issues previously unrelated. This inclination led as-Suyūṭī to reject certain verses classified as nāsikh-mansūkh by earlier scholars, arguing that they no longer met societal needs. His adaptive approach diverged from the traditional thinking of his contemporaries in Islamic jurisprudence, sparking significant polemics and debates.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aliffia Aswindasari http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Kontroversi Dalam Media Youtube: Analisis Penafsiran Gus Baha Dan Ustaz Adi Hidayat Tentang Kisah Nabi Adam
This research is motivated by the lack of understanding among some members of society regarding the diversity of interpretations, particularly in the story of Adam and Eve's expulsion from paradise, which is often perceived as their fault. The study focuses on two prominent Indonesian scholars, Ustaz Adi Hidayat and Gus Baha. From the various discussions by these two figures on the story of Prophet Adam, this research is limited to videos from three YouTube channels: Adi Hidayat Official, Tafsir NU, and Ngaji Gus Baha Jogja. The aim of this research is to analyze the controversies surrounding the interpretation of the story of Prophet Adam between Ustaz Adi Hidayat and Gus Baha, as well as to understand the ideological constructs presented in these discourses. The research uses a qualitative approach based on a literature study, with primary data obtained from the videos on these three YouTube channels. The analysis of the study employs Norman Fairclough's critical discourse theory, encompassing textual aspects, discourse practice (analysis of the YouTube accounts), and sociocultural practice (external factors influencing interpretation). The results reveal two main controversies: first, the interpretation related to the angels in Surah Al-Baqarah [2]: 30; second, the interpretation regarding the expulsion of Adam and Eve from paradise. Additionally, there are differences in how the story is presented. Gus Baha tends to use a philological approach, while Ustaz Adi Hidayat focuses more on linguistic studies. The analysis of the YouTube accounts indicates that Tafsir NU and Ngaji Gus Baha Jogja tend to support Nahdlatul Ulama, which is based on ahlus sunnah wal jamaah, whereas Adi Hidayat Official leans towards Muhammadiyah, which does not adhere to a single imam. Thus, Gus Baha clearly supports ahlus sunnah wal jamaah, while Ustaz Adi Hidayat does not associate his interpretation with any particular manhaj.
Copyright (c) 2024 Lubna Harira Amalia, Ahmad Fajri Asshdiqi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Konstruksi Literasi Keagamaan dalam Tafsir The Study Qur’an
This study investigates how The Study Quran, a commentary led by Seyyed Hossein Nasr, represents religious literacy within the framework of religious and cultural diversity. Employing a qualitative methodology, the research examines this commentary to delineate the concept of religious literacy and illustrates how this concept is manifested in the commentary's interpretation. The findings reveal that "The Study Quran" aims to foster an inclusive discourse by eschewing terminology that could incite sectarian conflict and emphasizing a universal understanding of submission to God. The commentary underscores the significance of interfaith dialogue and diversity while deliberately avoiding extremist interpretations, instead advocating for moderation and justice across various religions. By utilizing a thorough hermeneutical approach and offering a comprehensive understanding of the Quranic teachings, "The Study Quran" emerges as a crucial instrument in promoting peaceful coexistence and mitigating religiously motivated conflicts in multicultural contexts.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohammad Salahuddin Al-Ayyuubi, Abdul Haris http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Adaptasi Bahasa Sunda dalam Al-Amin Al-Qur’an Tarjamahan Sunda: Menelusuri Interaksi Budaya dalam Proses Penerjemahan Al-Qur'an
This study examines the application of vernacularization in Al-Amin's translation of the Qur'an, aiming to understand how the adaptation of the Sundanese language influences the comprehension and reception of sacred texts within the local cultural context. The research focuses on the use of both buhun (ancient) and kiwari (modern) languages in the translation, with the goal of aligning the Qur'anic text with Sundanese cultural wisdom. Employing content analysis and Sally Engle Merry's theory of vernacularization, the study investigates how language adaptation reflects the interaction between the Qur'anic text and Sundanese culture. The findings indicate that Al-Amin's translation effectively integrates local cultural elements through the use of buhun language to preserve cultural identity and contemporary language to ensure relevance for modern readers. This balance between tradition and modernity facilitates greater understanding within the local community. Additionally, the research reveals that vernacularization not only addresses linguistic issues but also enhances the understanding of the sacred text by aligning its meaning with the social realities of Sundanese culture. This contributes significantly to translation and cultural interaction studies, demonstrating how Qur'anic translation can act as a bridge between source and target cultures and expand our understanding of how sacred texts are adapted to local contexts.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rivki Lutfiya Farhan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Objektivitas Riwayat dalam Tafsir Jāmi’ al-Bayān: Ekplorasi Formasi Diskursif aṭ-Ṭabarī
The debate surrounding the subjectivity in aṭ-Ṭabarī’s use of history in his work Jāmi' al-Bayān challenges the perception of its popularity as a widely-referenced tafsīr bi ar-riwāyah (interpretation based on narration). The assumption that aṭ-Ṭabari defended tradition in his Quranic interpretation process necessitates an exploration of the contextual factors shaping his discursive formation. This study aims to uncover the interconnections within this formation by employing qualitative methods supported by archaeological analysis. The findings indicate that the intense intellectual debates during the Abbasid caliphate’s knowledge advancements influenced aṭ-Ṭabari’s interpretive model. The rationalistic tendencies that began to permeate Quranic interpretation were countered by aṭ-Ṭabarī’s decision to rely exclusively on well-known narrations from the Companions and Tabi'in. This approach is reflected in the interpretation of various verses on a majority scale. The intensity of the debates during aṭ-Ṭabarī’s era not only impacted interpretive methods but also extended to legal rulings and theological beliefs, often using Quranic arguments. Aṭ-Ṭabarī's response to this dynamic involved an interpretive model that emphasized the preeminence (tarjīḥ) of specific traditions, revealing his subjective inclinations. Similarly, his approach to responding to fiqh and theological issues, which often involved syllogism and linguistic analysis, demonstrates a tendency to choose meanings while critiquing the interpretive products of various schools of thought, indicating an inconsistency with the school he ostensibly supported. This aspect reveals aṭ-Ṭabarī’s independence from the prevailing mainstream schools of his time.
Copyright (c) 2024 Thoriqotul Faizah http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0