Kritik Ignaz Goldziher dan Pembelaan Musthofa al Azami terhadap Hadis dalam Kitab Shahih al-Bukhari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2020.2310Keywords:
Hadith Criticism, Ignaz Goldziher, Sahih Bukhari’s Book, Musthofa al Azami, OrientalistsAbstract
Criticism of the hadith will always appear, even though the scholars have agreed that the hadith is valid. This can be seen from the Sahih Bukhari book, which has been agreed by the ulama’ as a valid hadith book, but still received criticism from an orientalist named Ignaz Goldziher. Ignaz revealed that not all hadith listed in Sahih Bukhari are authentic, some of them are dhaif and maudhu’. In addition, Ignaz criticized the method used by Imam al Bukhari in researching hadith. According to him, Imam al Bukhari only focused on sanad and forgot the matan. Ignaz's criticism led to the conclusion that the traditions contained in Sahih Bukhari were not authentic from the Prophet Muhammad. According to him, these traditions were the result of fabrication by the generations after the Prophet. This conclusion is also corroborated by the reason for the codification of the hadith that occurred long after the Prophet generation. Responding to Ignaz's criticism, Musthofa al Azami (Muslim scholar) revealed that all of Ignaz's criticisms were baseless and could not be validly established as truth.
Abstract viewed: 1519 times
|
PDF downloaded = 3010 times
References
Yaqub, A. M., & Zuhri, Muh. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2000.
al Asqalani. Tahzib at- Tahzib. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1995.
Ahmad-von Velasco, T. (2018). Muhammad Mustafa al-A'zami (1930-2017) obituary. Hikma, 9(2), 249-261.
Al-Suyuthi. Tadrib al-Rawi. Madinah: al-Maktabah al-Ilmiyyah, 1392 H.
Azami, M. M. (1978). Studies in Hadith methodology and literature. American Trust Publications.
Darmalaksana, W. (2004). Hadis di Mata Orientalis: Telaah atas Pandangan Ignaz Goldziher dan Joseph Schacht.
Goldziher, I. (1971). Muslim Studies, trans. Stern, SM and Barber, CR,(New Brunswick, 1966).
Gottheil, R. (1922). Ignaz Goldziher. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 42, 189-193.
Haqan, A. (2011). Orientalisme dan Islam dalam Pergulatan Sejarah. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 1(2), 155-167.
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani. Hady al-Sari. Riyad: Riasah Adarah al-Buhuts al-Islamiyah Wa al-Ifta wa al-Da’wah wa al-Irsyad, t.th.
Ignaz Goldziher. Muslim Studies. terj C. B Barber dan S. M Sterm. London: T.P, 1971.
Imam al-Bukhari. Sahih al-Bukhari. Bab Masjidi Baiti al-Maqdisi, no Hadis ke-32 Juz 2
Joesoep Sou’yb. Orientalisme dan Islam. Jakarta; PT Bulan Bintang, 1990.
Labib Syauqi Akifahadi. Tanggapan Sarjana Muslim Terhadap Kajian Hadis Orientalis dalam website : http:// lenterahadis.com, di akses tgl 19 Maret 2020, waktu 11:51.
M. M Azami. Dirasat fi al-Hadis al-Nabawi wa Tarikh Tadwin. Jakarta: T.P, 1994.
Marzuki.“Kritik Terhadap Kitab Sahih al-Bukhari dan Sahih Muslim.” Journal Humanika. Vol 6. No 1. 2006.
Muhammad Abu Syuhbah. al-Kutub al-Sittah. Kairo:Majmu’al-Buhuts al-Islamiyyah, 1969.
Muhammad Ajaj al-Khatib. Ushul al-Hadis ‘Ulumuh Wa Mushtalahuhu. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1989.
Munzier Suparta. Ilmu Hadis. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Nuruddin. Manhaj an-Naqd fii Uluum al-Hadis. terj Mujiyo ‘Ulum al-Hadis. Bandung; PT Remaja Roskarya, 1994.
Permana, A. K. (2019). Diferensiasi Sunnah dan Hadis dalam Pandangan Ignaz Goldziher. Jurnal At-Tadbir: Media Hukum dan Pendidikan, 29(02), 21-39.
Rahim, A. (2010). Sejarah Perkembangan Orientalisme. HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 7(2), 179-192.
Rohmansyah. Hadis dan Sunnah dalam Perspektif Ignaz Goldziher. Jurnal Ulul Albab Vol 16. No. 2 tahun 2015.
Salahuddin Ahmad al-Adabi. Manhaj al-Naqd al-Matan ‘Inda’ Ulama al-Hadis al-Nabawiy. Beirut: Dar al-Falaq al-Jadidah, tt.
Setiawati, C. (2018). Kajian Orientalis Ignaz Goldziher tentang Hadis dan Sunnah. JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES, 7(2), 151-163.
Supian, A. (2016). Studi Hadis di Kalangan Orientalisme. Nuansa, 9(1).
Yaqub, Ali Mustafa Yaqub. Imam Bukhari Dan Metodologi Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1991.
Yuslem Nawir. Kitab Induk Hadis. Jakarta: Hijri Pustaka Utama, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
