ANALISIS POTENSI GOLPUT PADA PEMILU 2014 DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA

Mustadin Mustadin

Abstract


The number of abstentionsin the city of Yogyakarta was the biggest in the province of Yogyakarta In election 2009.The result showed the level of non-voters in the city of Yogyakarta was 34%. Abstentions in Yogyakarta occurred tendency increasingly in every election in Indonesia. Therefore, this study try to exploring and reading on the causes and potential abstentions in the2014 general election in Yogyakarta. This study used qualitative research methods. This research tries to explore the phenomenon of non-voters with a theoretical approach, and then this research explored the phenomenon of non-voters within-depth interviews for Ellection Commision of Yogyakarta (KPU). The results showed there are several factors influenced non-voters in the city of Yogyakarta. First; Technical factors, the example is sickness of voters when the election process. Second,Job factor or voter’s daily activities.Third; administrative factoris a factor related to the administrative aspects of the resulting voters could not exercise their voting rights.

Keywords


Abstentions; Qualitative; Yogyakarta.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ananta, A., Arifn, N.A., & Suryadinata, L. (2004) Indonesian Electoral Behaviour: A Statistical Perspective. Singapore; Institute of South Asian Studies.

Amiot, C. E., Sablonniere, R. D. L., Terry., J. T., & Smith, J. R. (2007). Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 364-388.

Chen, S., Chen, Y. K., & Shaw, L. (2004).SelfVerifcation Motives at Collective Level of Self-Defnition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 77-94.

Cottam, M.L., Dietz-Uhler, B., Mastors, E., Preston, T. (2012) Pengantar Psikologi Politik.Depok; Rajawali Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Eduational Research; Planning, Conducting, nd Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Rreserach. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Fuller J B., Marler L., Hester K., Frey. L., & Relyea, C. (2006). Construed External Image and Organizational Identifcation: A test of Moderating Influence of Need for Self-Esteem. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 701-706.

Mujani, S., Liddle, R.W., &Ambardi, K (2012).Kuasa Rakyat Analisis tentang Perilaku Memilih dalam Pemilihan Legislatif dan Presiden Indonesia Pasca-Orde-Baru. Jakarta; Mizan.

Mujani, S & Liddle, R.W. (2010). Personalities, Parties, and Voters. Journal of Democracy.21, 2. National Endowment for Democracy and The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mustadin, (2013).Puasa sebagai Momentum Pemilu Bersih 2014.www.kompassiana. com.

Susianto, B. (2004) Pergeseran Perilaku Pemilih Indonesia. Kompas, tanggal: 28 Sep 04) (http://www.kompas.co.id/kompascetak/0409/28/opini/1291305.htm).

Ali, N. (1999). Peradaban Komunikasi Politik, Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arianto, B. (2011).Analisis Penyebab Masyarakat tidak memilih dalam pemilu, Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Ilmu pemerintahan Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji.

Budiman, A.(2006).Kebebasan, Negara, Pembangunan, Pustaka Alvabet, Jakarta.

Sanit, A.(1992). Aneka Pandangan Fenomena Politik Golput, Pustaka Sinar Harapan,Jakarta.

Straus, A., & Corbin, J. (1990).Basic of Qulitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London. Sage Publications.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.2013.%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Psikologi Integratif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.