INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION FACTORS FORMING SUPPORTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS AT DIAN NUSWANTORO UNIVERSITY SEMARANG

Mutia Rahmi Pratiwi, Naiza Rosalia, Fibriyani Nur Aliya

Abstract


Abstrak. Universitas Dian Nuswantoro (Udinus) sebagai Universitas Terbaik ketiga Nasional memiliki Visi “The Top Priority University to be Chosen in education and Enterpreneurship”. Visi ini diimplementasikan melalui pemberian mata kuliah kewirausahaan. Indikator keberhasilan sekaligus indikator prestasi mata kuliah yang diberikan, dapat dilihat melalui jumlah lulusan yang menjadi wirausaha, yaitu sejumlah 165 sejak tahun 2011. Berdasar data tersebut, dapat dikatakan bahwa lulusan yang menjadi wirausaha masih sangat sedikit. Diketahui bahwa pencapaian prestasi sangat dipengaruhi oleh lingkungan belajar yang mendukung, terutama pada saat terjadi interaksi komunikasi antar personal Dosen dan Mahasiswa. Berdasar hal tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor Komunikasi Antar Pribadi yang mampu meningkatkan lingkungan belajar yang mendukung di Universitas Dian Nuswantoro. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah analisis faktor, dengan dua belas variabel asal. Adapun dua belas faktor tersebut antara lain, toleransi, kesempatan yang seimbang, sikap menghargai, sikap mendukung, sikap terbuka, pemilikan informasi, kepercayaan, keakraban, kesejajaran, control dan pengawasan, respon, dan suasana emosional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sepuluh faktor baru yang terbentuk yaitu perhatian, timbal balik, akurasi, kolaborasi, pengertian, kejelasan, kejujuran, keintiman, keikhlasan, kesetiaan.  Faktor yang paling dominan adalah faktor perhatian. Berdasar hasil penelitian, disarankan kepada pengajar untuk dapat menerapkan kesepuluh faktor dalam pembelajaran mata kuliah yang termasuk dalam turunan kewirausahaan, terlebih faktor perhatian. Penerapan faktor-faktor ini dalam pembelajaran mata kuliah kewirausahaan diharapkan mampu membentuk lingkungan belajar yang mendukung dan mampu meningkatkan motivasi untuk berwirausaha. Konteks tentang pengaruh faktor komunikasi antar personal dalam pembelajaran terhadap motivasi berwirausaha dapat dikaji pada penelitian selanjutnya.

 

Abstract. Dian Nuswantoro University (Udinus) as the third best National University, has a vision "The Top Priority University to be Chosen in Education and Entrepreneurship". This vision is implemented through the provision of entrepreneurship courses. Indicators of success as well as indicators of achievement given courses, can be seen through the number of graduates who become entrepreneurs, which is a number of 165 since 2011. Based on these data, it can be said that graduates who become entrepreneurs are very few. It is known that achievement is greatly influenced by a supportive learning environment, especially when communication interactions occur between lecturers and students. This study aims to determine the factors of Interpersonal Communication that can improve the supportive learning environment at Dian Nuswantoro University. The research method used was factor analysis, with twelve origin variables. They are, tolerance, balanced opportunities, respect, support, openness, ownership of information, trust, intimacy, alignment, control and supervision, response, and emotional atmosphere. The results showed ten new factors formed namely attention, reciprocity, accuracy, collaboration, understanding, clarity, honesty, intimacy, sincerity, and loyalty. The most dominant factor is attention. Based on the results of the study, it is advisable for instructors to be able to apply the ten factors in learning subjects included in entrepreneurship, especially attention factors. The application of these factors in learning entrepreneurship courses is expected to form a supportive learning environment and be able to increase motivation for entrepreneurship. The context of the influence of interpersonal communication factors in learning on entrepreneurial motivation can be examined in furtherresearch



Keywords


factor Analysis, Interpersonal Communication, Udinus

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahearne, J. F. (2011). Honesty. American Scientist, 99(2), 120–123. Retrieved from https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA259079837&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00030996&p=AONE&sw=w

Ahmadi, A. & T. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Baharuddin. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ar Ruzz Media.

Center, C. (2019). Data Alumni Wirausawa.

Dale, E., Kelly, P. J., Lee, K. S. K., Conigrave, J. H., Ivers, R., & Clapham, K. (2019). Systematic review of addiction recovery mutual support groups and Indigenous people of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States of America and Hawaii. Addictive Behaviors, 98, 106038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106038

Dalyono. (2005). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dictionary, C. (2019). Borderless.

Dinus. (2015). Our Vision.

Djamarah, Sayiful Bahri & Aswan, Z. (2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Dobrescu, T., & Grosu, E. F. (2014). Aspects Regarding Classroom Management and its Part in Making the Educational Process More Effective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.05.082

Gunawan, I. (2017). Pengantar Statistika Inferensial. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Hajovsky, D. B., Mason, B. A., & McCune, L. A. (2017). Teacher-student relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: A longitudinal examination of gender differences. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSP.2017.04.001

Hatsor, L. (2015). Higher education funding: The value of information. Economics Letters, 137, 230–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONLET.2015.10.031

Jantz, R. C. (2017). Vision, innovation, and leadership in research libraries. Library & Information Science Research, 39(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LISR.2017.07.006

Kim, T.-Y., Wang, J., & Chen, J. (2018). Mutual Trust Between Leader and Subordinate and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3093-y

Laal, M., Khattami-Kermanshahi, Z., & Laal, M. (2014). Teaching and Education; Collaborative Style. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4057–4061. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.890

Maher, P. (2007). Explication Defended. Studia Logica, 86(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9063-8

Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Martins, J., Branco, F., Gonçalves, R., Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., Oliveira, T., Naranjo-Zolotov, M., & Cruz-Jesus, F. (2019). Assessing the success behind the use of education management information systems in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.001

Meyer, J., Fleckenstein, J., & Köller, O. (2019). Expectancy value interactions and academic achievement: Differential relationships with achievement measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2019.01.006

Ohtsubo, Y., & Watanabe, E. (2009). Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of a costly signaling model of apology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.09.004

Perkins, David & Blythe, T. (1994). Putting Understanding Up Front. Educational Leadership.

Power, E. A. (2017). Discerning devotion: Testing the signaling theory of religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVOLHUMBEHAV.2016.07.003

Purwanto, N. (2006). Ilmu Pendidikan Teoritis dan Praktis. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Saroni, M. (2006). Manajemen Sekolah; Kiat Menjadi Pendidik yang Kompeten. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Arruz.

Shaari, A. S., Yusoff, N. M., Ghazali, I. M., Osman, R. H., & Dzahir, N. F. M. (2014). The Relationship between Lecturers’ Teaching Style and Students’ Academic Engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.02.002

Sidi, I. D. (2005). Menuju Masyarakat Belajar. Jakarta: Paramidina.

Sugiarto, Siagian, D., Sunaryanto, L. T., & Oetomo, D. S. (2003). Teknik Sampling. jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Suparman, S. (2010). Gaya Mengajar yang Menyenangkan Siswa. Yogyakarta: Pinus book Publisher.

Suranto, A. (2011). Komunikasi Interpersonal. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Taylor, J. (2017). Why Thoughtfulness Is the Key to Building a Massive Network. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@swyyft/want-to-build-a-massive-network-be-thoughtful-7d2c144d95b1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v13i1.1723

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Published by:
Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Indonesia