METODE INTERPRETASI ZOOSEMIOTIKA SASTRA AL-QUR’AN DAN APLIKASINYA DALAM SURAT AL-MUDDAṠṠIR AYAT KE 50-51

Muhamad Agus Mushodiq

doi:10.14421/ajbs.2022.06203

METODE INTERPRETASI ZOOSEMIOTIKA SASTRA AL-QUR’AN DAN APLIKASINYA DALAM SURAT AL-MUDDAṠṠIR AYAT KE 50-51

Muhamad Agus Mushodiq

Abstract

Discrimination and ill-treatment of animals are still ongoing today. In the Islamic world, this is allegedly the result of a non-holistic interpretation of religious texts. This paper aims to formulate a literature zoosemiotic interpretation method of the Qur'an and apply it to Surah al-Muddaṡṡir verses 50-51. The method is formulated to explore the meaning of animal verses in the Qur'an holistically and proportionally. There are two results of the research in this article. First, the steps of the literary zoosemiotics interpretation method refer to (1) determining the typology of animals in the Qur'an based on literary zoological themes, (2) outlining asbāb al-nuzūl micro-macro and makiyyah-madaniyyah letters. (3) conducting a study of munāsabah al-āyāt, intratextual, and intertextuality, (4) reviewing the results of previous mufasir interpretations, (5) describing the meaning of the word verse with semiotics and balāgah, and (6) efforts find zoosembiology (reciprocity) between the Qur'anic literature and zoology and conclude the relevance between animal literature and human life. Second, based on the new myth, the ḥumur ‘donkeys’ in Surah al-Muddaṡṡir verses 50-51 describes the fanaticism of the tribes and the degree of opposition of the Quraysh to the da'wah of the Prophet Muhammad, not the symbol of ignorance that exists in the old myth.

Keywords

Animal discrimination, literature zoosemiotic, Al-Qur’an, interpretation

Full Text:

PDF

References

'Abd Raḥman bint Syāṭi’, ’Āisyah. 1971. al-I’jāz al-Bayāni li al-Qur’ān wa Masā’il Ibn al-Azraq. Mesir: Dār al-Ma’ārif.

Ibn ’Abd al-Salām al-Sulamī, Muḥammad ’Izz al-Dīn ’Abd al-Azīz. 1991. Qawāid Al-Aḥkām fī Maṣāliḥ al-Anām. Kairo: Maktabah Kulliyat al-Azhar.

Ibn 'Abd Allah, Abū Hilāl al-Ḥasan. 1988. 2 Jamharah al-Amṡāl. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Gazālī, Syu’aib. 2014. “Mabāhiṡ al-Tasybīh wa al-Tamṡīl fī Tafsīr al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr li Ibn ’Asyūr.” Jāmi’ah Ummul Qura’.

Ibn ’Arabī, Muḥy al-Dīn. 2011. 2 Tafsīr Ibn ’Arabī. Beirut: Dār al Kutub al-Ilmiyah.

al-’Askari, Abū Hilāl. t.t. Kitāb al-Ṣina’atain: al-Kitābah wa al-Syi’r. Kairo: Dār al-Fikr al-’Arabī.

Ibn ’Āsyūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. 1984. 31 Tafsīr al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Tunis: Dār al-Tūnisiyah li al-Nasyr.

Barrio, Elena, Karen J. Rickards, dan Alexandra K. Thiemann. 2019. “Clinical Evaluation and Preventative Care in Donkeys.” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 35(3): 545–60.

Barthes, Roland. 2007. Petualangan Semiologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

———. 2017. Elemen-Elemen Semiologi. Yogyakarta: BASABASI.

Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE.

Endraswara, Suwardi. 2019. Metode Penelitian Zoologi Sastra. ed.1 Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Fayūdī, Basyūnī ’Abd al-Fattāḥ. 1992. Min Balāgah al-Nużum al-Qur’ānī. Kairo: Maṭba’ah al-Ḥusain al-Islāmiyah.

Foltz, Richard. 2014. Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures. Penyunting: Simon dan Schuster.

Haines, Anna, dan Joanna Goliszek. 2019. “Donkey and Mule Behaviour for the Veterinary Team.” UK-Vet Equine 3(1): 27–32.

Hanks, Matt. “Donkey Fact Sheet.” : 6.

al-Hāsyimī, Aḥmad. Jawāhir al-Balāgah. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-’Aṣriyyah.

al-Jābirī, Muḥammad ’Ābid. 2008. 1 Fahm Al-Qur’ān al-Ḥakīm: Al-Tafsīr al-Waḍīḥ Ḥasba Tartīb al-Nuzūl. Maroko: Dār al-Nasyr al-Magribiyyah.

al-Jailānī al-Ḥusnī, ’Abd al-Qādir. t.t. al-Gunyah: Liṭālibī Ṭarīq al-Ḥaq ’Azza wa Jalla. Bagdad: Maktabah al-Syarq al-Jadīd.

al-Janabī, Mat’ab Asīl. 2016. “Al-Ḥayawān fī al-Qur’an-Dirāsah Simiyaiyyah.” Lark Journal For Philosophy , Linguistics and Social Sciences 1(22). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/122513 (November 26, 2020).

Jarīm, Alī, dan Muṣṭafā Amīn. al-Balāgah al-Waḍīḥah. Kairo: Dār al-Ma’ārif.

al-Khūlī, Amīn. 2003. Manāhij Tajdīd fī An-Naḥwi Wa al-Balāgah Wa al-Tafsīr Wa al-Adab. Mesir: Maktabah al-‘Usrah.

Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Quran. 2012. Tafsir ’Ilmi: Hewan dalam Perspektif al-Qur’an dan Sains. Kementerian Agama RI, Badan Litbang & Diklat, Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf al-Qur’an.

Mahsun, M. S. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

al-Mubarakfury, Shafiy al-Rahmān. 1997. Sirah Nabawiyah. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Ibn Muḥammad, Abū al-Faḍl. 2010. Majma’ al-Amṡāl. ed. 1. Beirut: Dār Ma’rifah.

Muḥammad al-Najār, Rāgib. 2006. Min Āyāt al-I’jāz al-Ilmī: al-Ḥayawān fī al-Qur’an al-Karīm. Beirut: Dār al-Ma’rifah.

Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Dumairī, Kamāl ad-Dīn. 1992. Ḥayāh al-Ḥayawān al-Kubrā. Damaskus: Dār Talasn.

Mushodiq, Muhamad Agus dkk. 2021. “Urgensi Zoologi Sastra Alquran: Studi Kasus Pada Seni Kisah Zoomorfik Al-Farasy Surat Al-Qari’ah.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 5(1): 1–28.

Noth, Winfried. 2006. Semiotik. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Pelé, Marie, Jean-Yves Georges, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, dan Cédric Sueur. 2021. “Editorial: Perceptions of Human-Animal Relationships and Their Impacts on Animal Ethics, Law and Research.” Frontiers in Psychology 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.631238 (August 13, 2022).

Piliang, Yasraf Amir. 2012. Semiotika dan Hipersemiotika: Kode, Gaya & Matinya Makna. Matahari.

Proops, Leanne, Faith Burden, dan Britta Osthaus. 2012. “Social Relations in a Mixed Group of Mules, Ponies and Donkeys Reflect Differences in Equid Type.” Behavioural Processes 90(3): 337–42.

Qutb, Sayyid. 2004. Indahnya al-Qur’an Berkisah. Jakarta: Gema Insani.

Rahman, Fazlur. 1985. Islam dan Modernitas tentang Transformasi Intelektual. Bandung: Pustaka.

Rusmana, Dadan. 2005. Tokoh dan Pemikiran Semiotik. Bandung: Tazkiya Press.

Saeed, Abdullah. 2006. Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a Contemporary Approach. Taylor & Francis.

al-Sairafī, Kāmil. 1970. Dīwān Syi’ir al-Mutalamis al-Żuba’i Riwāyatu al-Aśrami wa Abῑ 'Ubaidah 'an al-Aśma'ῑ ’Uniya Bitaḥqīqihī wa Syarḥihī wa al-Ta’līq ’Alihi Ḥasan Kamil al-Sairafī. al-’Arabiyah al-Su’udiyah: Ma’had al-Makhṭūṭāt al-’Arabiyah.

Setiawan, Mohamad Nur Kholis. 2006. Al-Qur’an Kitab Sastra Terbesar. cet. 2. Yogyakarta: Elsaq Press.

Sparks, Tom. 2020. “Protection of Animals Through Human Rights: The Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights.” In Studies in Global Animal Law, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, ed. Anne Peters. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 153–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60756-5_13 (August 13, 2022).

Stibbe, Arran. 2021. Ekolinguistik Bahasa, Ekologi, dan Cerita-Cerita Yang Kita Jalani. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Svendsen, Elisabeth. “Understanding Donkey Behaviour.” The Donkey Sanctuary. https://www.thedonkeysanctuary.org.uk/what-we-do/knowledge-and-advice/for-owners/understanding-donkey-behaviour (February 12, 2022).

Syamsuddin, Sahiron. 2017. “Ma’na-Cum-Maghza Approach to the Qur’an: Interpretation of Q. 5:51.” In Atlantis Press, 131–36. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icqhs-17/25890929 (January 27, 2022).

Syamsuddin, Sahiron dkk. 2020. Pendekatan Ma‘nā-Cum-Maghzā Atas Al-Qur’an dan Hadis: Menjawab Problematika Sosial Keagamaan di Era Kontemporer. Bantul: Ladang Kata.

al-Ṭabarī, Abū Ja’far Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. 2014. 12 Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī al-Musammā Jāmi’ al-Bayān fī Ta’wīl al-Qur’ān. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah.

Ibn Tagrī Burdī, Yūsuf. 2011. Maurīdu al-Laṭafah man wa la al-Sulṭanah wa al-Khilāfah. Kairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.

Thiemann, Alexandra K., dan Rebekah J.E. Sullivan. 2019. “Gastrointestinal Disorders of Donkeys and Mules.” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 35(3): 419–32.

Tlili, Sarra. 2012. Animals in the Qur’an. Cambridge University Press.

van Zoest, Aart. 1993. Semiotika: Tentang Tanda, Cara Kerjanya dan Apa yang Kita Lakukan Dengannya. Jakarta: Yayasan Sumber Agung.

Wielandt, Rotraud. 2002. “Exegesis of the Qur’an: Early Modern and Contemporary.” Encyclopaedia of the Qur’an : EQ 2: 124–42.

al-Zamakhsyarī al-Khwārazmī, Abī Al-Qāsim Maḥmūd ibn ‘Umar. 2016. 4 al-Kasysyāf ’an Ḥaqāiq al-Tanzīl wa ’Uyūn al-Aqāwil fī Wujūh al-Ta’wīl. Beirut: Dār al-Iḥyā’ al-Turaṡ al-‘Arabi.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2022.06203