SIGNIFIKANSI KAJIAN BUDAYA BAGI PENGEMBANGAN ILMU-ILMU HUMANIORA

Authors

  • St. Sunardi Universitas Sanata Dharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2011.10208

Abstract

Cultural studies in the development of humanities studies is now in a problematic position, if not the opposite. While cultural studies pivot on the practice of meaning in the context of change, humanities sciences nowadays dwell on the mastery of knowledge and skills. It tends to forget its original purpose as studies that aim to humanize humans. To resolve this problem so that both have creative power, the humanities studies must have the courage to present the studies in three-channel mode, namely political, textual and post-disciplinary. Meanwhile, to preserve its anticipatory power, cultural studies must no longer shy to enter the territory of aesthetics and ethics in its studies.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Denzin, Norman K. 1992. Symbolic Interactionalism and Cultural Studies. The Politic of Interpretation. Oxford UK: Blackwell

Sunardi, St. 2003. Semiotika Negativa. Yogyakarta: Kanal.

Sunardi, St. Jurnal Retorik, Oktober 2003, hlm. 5-42.

Sunardi, St. Majalah Basis, November-Desember 2002, hlm. 8-15.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SIGNIFIKANSI KAJIAN BUDAYA BAGI PENGEMBANGAN ILMU-ILMU HUMANIORA. (2011). Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(2), 387-394. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2011.10208