Normalization of Student Cohabitation and Its Implications for Social Functioning: An Ecological Social Work Perspective from Jember, Indonesia

Authors

  • Akhmad Munif Mubarok Universitas Jember
  • Aura Pamungkas Universitas Jember
  • Kusuma Wulandari Universitas Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/welfare.2025.141-03

Keywords:

Kohabitasi, Mahasiswa, Perilaku, Normalisasi, Keberfungsian Sosial, Cohabitation, Student, Normalization, Social Function

Abstract

Student cohabitation has become an increasingly visible phenomenon in university towns; however, it is often normatively framed as moral deviation or individual misconduct. Limited attention has been given to understanding cohabitation as a social–ecological process that shapes students’ social functioning, particularly from a social work perspective in non-Western contexts. This study aims to analyze the normalization of student cohabitation and its implications for social functioning through an ecological social work lens. Employing a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and document analysis involving students engaged in cohabitation, boarding house managers, and community actors in Sumbersari Village, Jember Regency, Indonesia. The data were analyzed thematically to capture the interactions among individual experiences, relational dynamics, and environmental structures. The findings indicate that student cohabitation is normalized through emotional closeness, practical considerations, and permissive housing environments. Students develop adaptive attitudes such as indifference to social judgment, personal rationalization, and selective disclosure of their relationships. Regarding social functioning, cohabitation produces ambivalent outcomes. On one hand, it strengthens emotional support and academic motivation; on the other, it may limit broader social engagement and increase emotional dependency, particularly when relational disruptions occur. This study demonstrates that student cohabitation should be understood as a social–ecological phenomenon rather than a purely individual choice. Its main contribution lies in advancing social work scholarship by positioning cohabitation as an issue of social functioning within a person-in-environment framework. The findings highlight the importance of preventive, community-based social work interventions in higher education settings, particularly those aimed at promoting healthy relationship literacy, emotional autonomy, and sustainable social support systems for students.

Keywords: student cohabitation, social functioning, ecological systems theory, normalization, social work

Kohabitasi mahasiswa merupakan fenomena yang semakin terlihat di kawasan pendidikan tinggi, namun masih kerap dipahami secara normatif sebagai penyimpangan moral atau persoalan individual. Kajian yang menempatkan kohabitasi sebagai proses sosial-ekologis yang memengaruhi keberfungsian sosial mahasiswa, khususnya dari perspektif pekerjaan sosial di konteks non-Barat, masih sangat terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses normalisasi kohabitasi mahasiswa serta implikasinya terhadap keberfungsian sosial melalui perspektif pekerjaan sosial berbasis ekologi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain fenomenologis. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi non-partisipan, dan studi dokumentasi terhadap mahasiswa pelaku kohabitasi, pengelola kos, serta aktor lingkungan di Kelurahan Sumbersari, Kabupaten Jember. Analisis data dilakukan secara tematik untuk menangkap interaksi antara pengalaman individual, dinamika relasional, dan struktur lingkungan sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kohabitasi mahasiswa dinormalisasi melalui kedekatan emosional, pertimbangan praktis, serta lingkungan hunian yang permisif. Mahasiswa mengembangkan sikap adaptif berupa ketidakpedulian terhadap penilaian sosial, rasionalisasi personal, dan keterbukaan selektif dalam mengelola relasi. Dari sisi keberfungsian sosial, kohabitasi menghasilkan dampak yang ambivalen. Di satu sisi, kohabitasi memperkuat dukungan emosional dan motivasi akademik; di sisi lain, praktik ini berpotensi membatasi partisipasi sosial yang lebih luas dan meningkatkan ketergantungan emosional, terutama ketika relasi mengalami gangguan. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa kohabitasi mahasiswa perlu dipahami sebagai fenomena sosial-ekologis, bukan sekadar pilihan individual. Kontribusi utama penelitian ini terletak pada penguatan perspektif pekerjaan sosial dengan memposisikan kohabitasi sebagai isu keberfungsian sosial dalam kerangka person-in-environment. Temuan penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya intervensi pekerjaan sosial yang bersifat preventif dan berbasis komunitas di lingkungan perguruan tinggi, khususnya dalam penguatan literasi relasi sehat, kemandirian emosional, dan sistem dukungan sosial mahasiswa yang berkelanjutan.

Kata kunci: kohabitasi mahasiswa, keberfungsian sosial, teori sistem ekologi, normalisasi sosial, pekerjaan sosial.

Abstract viewed: 29 times |

References

Alfaruqy, M. Z., Dewi, A. C., & Emeralda, V. T. (2022). Konstruksi sosialisasi nilai: Perspektif remaja dan orang tuanya. Psychocentrum Review, 4(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.26539/pcr.41816

Anugerah, C. V. S. W. A. (2023). Peran mahasiswa Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam mengembalikan keberfungsian sosial perempuan korban kekerasan melalui metode group work. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 1(12).

Apriliani, F. T., Wibowo, H., Humaedi, S., & Irfan, M. (2020). Model keberfungsian sosial masyarakat pada kehidupan normal baru. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 2(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v2i2.29123

Ardiansyah, Sarinah, Susilawati, & Juanda. (2022). Kajian psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud. Jurnal Kependidikan, 7(1), 25–31. http://e-journallppmunsa.ac.id/index.php/kependidikan/article/view/912

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Azizah, W. N., Dewi, D. A., & Furnamasari, Y. F. (2021). Peran mahasiswa dalam menyadarkan masyarakat Indonesia untuk saling berintegrasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 8327–8334.

Badan Pusat Statistik Jawa Timur. (2022). Jumlah perguruan tinggi (negeri dan swasta) menurut kabupaten/kota. https://jatim.bps.go.id

Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177

Bogle, K. A. (2017). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus (2nd ed.). New York University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Burlian, P. (2021). Patologi sosial. PT Bumi Aksara.

Conley, C. S., Durlak, J. A., & Dickson, D. A. (2015). An evaluative review of outcome research on universal mental health promotion and prevention programs for higher education students. Journal of American College Health, 63(5), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1024047

Cooke, T. J., Mulder, C. H., & Thomas, M. (2020). Union formation, housing, and life course transitions. Demographic Research, 42, 95–124. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.4

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Danardana, A., & Setyawan, V. P. (2022). Kriminalisasi fenomena penyimpangan sosial kumpul kebo dalam perspektif hukum pidana. Justitia et Pax, 38(1), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v38i1.5713

Detik News. (2018, March 3). Razia kos di Jember, 7 pasangan mesum diamankan. https://news.detik.com

Eisenberg, D., Hunt, J., & Speer, N. (2013). Mental health in American colleges and universities. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31827ab077

Freud, S. (2016). Psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud (K. Bertens, Ed.; 2nd ed.). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hadian, V. A., Maulida, D. A., & Faiz, A. (2022). Peran lingkungan keluarga dalam pembentukan karakter. Journal of Education and Development, 10(1), 240–246.

Hafrida, H., Haryadi, H., Munandar, T. I., Rakhmawati, D., & Kadir, N. A. B. A. (2024). Students’ perception of the criminalization of cohabitation (kumpul kebo) in Indonesia. Jambe Law Journal, 7(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i1.340

Hisyam, C. J. (2021). Penyimpangan sosial: Tinjauan sosiologis. PT Bumi Aksara.

Inaku, R., & Paputungan, F. (2022). Affective theory according to experts. Journal of Education and Culture, 2(2), 2986–3012.

Irmayanti, N., & Zuroidah, A. (2024). Emotional dependency and self-esteem in dating violence victims: A systematic review. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 11, 314–332.

Kierkus, C. A., Johnson, B. R., & Hewitt, J. D. (2010). Cohabiting, family and community stressors, selection, and juvenile delinquency. Criminal Justice Review, 35(4), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016810379338

Krzyżanowski, M. (2020). Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193

Manning, W. D., & Cohen, J. A. (2012). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(2), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00960.x

Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2015). Cohabitation and marriage in young adulthood. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 646(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215591754

May, C., & Finch, T. (2009). Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices. Sociology, 43(3), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509103208

Midgley, J. (1997). Social welfare in global context. Sage Publications.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Payne, M. (2020). Modern social work theory (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Perelli-Harris, B., et al. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation. Demographic Research, 31, 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34

Rauer, A. J., Sabey, A. K., & Jensen, J. F. (2013). Romantic relationships and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032851

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Saleebey, D. (2013). The strengths perspective in social work practice (6th ed.). Pearson.

Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2017). Cohabitation nation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12364

Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Sliding versus deciding. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021323

Wieteska, M. (2018). Marriage vs cohabitation. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 9(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20181.27.35

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Mubarok, A. M., Pamungkas, A., & Wulandari, K. (2025). Normalization of Student Cohabitation and Its Implications for Social Functioning: An Ecological Social Work Perspective from Jember, Indonesia. WELFARE : Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/welfare.2025.141-03