Normalization of Student Cohabitation and Its Implications for Social Functioning: An Ecological Social Work Perspective from Jember, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/welfare.2025.141-03Keywords:
Kohabitasi, Mahasiswa, Perilaku, Normalisasi, Keberfungsian Sosial, Cohabitation, Student, Normalization, Social FunctionAbstract
Student cohabitation has become an increasingly visible phenomenon in university towns; however, it is often normatively framed as moral deviation or individual misconduct. Limited attention has been given to understanding cohabitation as a social–ecological process that shapes students’ social functioning, particularly from a social work perspective in non-Western contexts. This study aims to analyze the normalization of student cohabitation and its implications for social functioning through an ecological social work lens. Employing a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and document analysis involving students engaged in cohabitation, boarding house managers, and community actors in Sumbersari Village, Jember Regency, Indonesia. The data were analyzed thematically to capture the interactions among individual experiences, relational dynamics, and environmental structures. The findings indicate that student cohabitation is normalized through emotional closeness, practical considerations, and permissive housing environments. Students develop adaptive attitudes such as indifference to social judgment, personal rationalization, and selective disclosure of their relationships. Regarding social functioning, cohabitation produces ambivalent outcomes. On one hand, it strengthens emotional support and academic motivation; on the other, it may limit broader social engagement and increase emotional dependency, particularly when relational disruptions occur. This study demonstrates that student cohabitation should be understood as a social–ecological phenomenon rather than a purely individual choice. Its main contribution lies in advancing social work scholarship by positioning cohabitation as an issue of social functioning within a person-in-environment framework. The findings highlight the importance of preventive, community-based social work interventions in higher education settings, particularly those aimed at promoting healthy relationship literacy, emotional autonomy, and sustainable social support systems for students.
Keywords: student cohabitation, social functioning, ecological systems theory, normalization, social work
Kohabitasi mahasiswa merupakan fenomena yang semakin terlihat di kawasan pendidikan tinggi, namun masih kerap dipahami secara normatif sebagai penyimpangan moral atau persoalan individual. Kajian yang menempatkan kohabitasi sebagai proses sosial-ekologis yang memengaruhi keberfungsian sosial mahasiswa, khususnya dari perspektif pekerjaan sosial di konteks non-Barat, masih sangat terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses normalisasi kohabitasi mahasiswa serta implikasinya terhadap keberfungsian sosial melalui perspektif pekerjaan sosial berbasis ekologi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain fenomenologis. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi non-partisipan, dan studi dokumentasi terhadap mahasiswa pelaku kohabitasi, pengelola kos, serta aktor lingkungan di Kelurahan Sumbersari, Kabupaten Jember. Analisis data dilakukan secara tematik untuk menangkap interaksi antara pengalaman individual, dinamika relasional, dan struktur lingkungan sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kohabitasi mahasiswa dinormalisasi melalui kedekatan emosional, pertimbangan praktis, serta lingkungan hunian yang permisif. Mahasiswa mengembangkan sikap adaptif berupa ketidakpedulian terhadap penilaian sosial, rasionalisasi personal, dan keterbukaan selektif dalam mengelola relasi. Dari sisi keberfungsian sosial, kohabitasi menghasilkan dampak yang ambivalen. Di satu sisi, kohabitasi memperkuat dukungan emosional dan motivasi akademik; di sisi lain, praktik ini berpotensi membatasi partisipasi sosial yang lebih luas dan meningkatkan ketergantungan emosional, terutama ketika relasi mengalami gangguan. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa kohabitasi mahasiswa perlu dipahami sebagai fenomena sosial-ekologis, bukan sekadar pilihan individual. Kontribusi utama penelitian ini terletak pada penguatan perspektif pekerjaan sosial dengan memposisikan kohabitasi sebagai isu keberfungsian sosial dalam kerangka person-in-environment. Temuan penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya intervensi pekerjaan sosial yang bersifat preventif dan berbasis komunitas di lingkungan perguruan tinggi, khususnya dalam penguatan literasi relasi sehat, kemandirian emosional, dan sistem dukungan sosial mahasiswa yang berkelanjutan.
Kata kunci: kohabitasi mahasiswa, keberfungsian sosial, teori sistem ekologi, normalisasi sosial, pekerjaan sosial.
References
Akesson, B., Burns, V., & Hordyk, S.-R. (2017). The Place of Place in Social Work: Rethinking the Person-in-Environment Model in Social Work Education and Practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(3), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1272512
Ardiansyah, A., Sarinah, S., Susilawati, S., & Juanda, J. (2022). Kajian Psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud. Jurnal Kependidikan, 7(1), 25–31.
Arnett, J. J. (2024). Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens Through the Twenties. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197695937.001.0001
Bachrach, C. A. (2013). Culture and Demography: From Reluctant Bedfellows to Committed Partners. Demography, 51(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0257-6
Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social Integration, Social Networks, Social Support, and Health. In L. F. Berkman Ph. D. & I. Kawachi M. D. ,Ph. D. (Eds.), Social Epidemiology (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083316.003.0007
Boudreault-Bouchard, A.-M., Dion, J., Hains, J., Vandermeerschen, J., Laberge, L., & Perron, M. (2013). Impact of parental emotional support and coercive control on adolescents’ self-esteem and psychological distress: Results of a four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 36(4), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.05.002
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=OCmbzWka6xUC
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The Bioecological Model of Human Development. In Handbook of Child Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
Brown, S. L. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality. Social Science Research, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00036-X
Brown, S. L., Manning, W. D., & Payne, K. K. (2017). Relationship Quality Among Cohabiting Versus Married Couples. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1730–1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861.
Cleece, K., Cheneler, B., Harrison, J., & Hill, J. E. (2025). Relational practice, a critical component for successful social work. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2492402. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2492402
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2).
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=gX1ZDwAAQBAJ
Danardana, A., & Setyawan, V. P. (2022). Kriminalisasi Fenomena Penyimpangan Sosial Kumpul Kebo (Samenlaven) dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Justitia et Pax, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v38i1.5713
Deng, L., & Lee, C. (2025). How perceived campus environments influence college students’ mental health: Mediating roles of campus life experiences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 108, 102808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102808
Foran, H. M., Mueller, J., Schulz, W., & Hahlweg, K. (2022). Cohabitation, Relationship Stability, Relationship Adjustment, and Children’s Mental Health Over 10 Years. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746306
Gitterman, A., & Germain, C. B. (2008). The Life Model of Social Work Practice (3rd ed.). Columbia University Press. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/gitt13998
Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1214–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x
Hewitt, B., & Vidal, S. (2025). Health and well-being in cohabitation versus marriage: Are cohabitants’ marriage intentions important? Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101488
Jankowiak, B., Soroko, E., Kuryś-Szyncel, K., Jaskulska, S., Hill, C. T., Sawaumi, T., Sanz-Barbero, B., Vives-Cases, C., Neves, S., Inagaki, T., Lee, J., & Watanabe, Y. (2025). Building Bridges Between Arnett’s and Havighurst’s Theories: New Developmental Tasks in Emerging Adulthood Across Six Countries. Emerging Adulthood, 13(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968251322822
Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks, 25(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(03)00010-8
Kou, J., & Li, Y. (2025). Childhood left-behind experiences and premarital cohabitation: Evidence from China. Demographic Research, 53, 969–1002. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.30
Kravdal, Ø., Wörn, J., & Reme, B.-A. (2023). Mental health benefits of cohabitation and marriage: A longitudinal analysis of Norwegian register data. Population Studies, 77(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2022.2063933
Krzyżanowski, M. (2020). Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms and “new” normality: Discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193
Kuang, B. (2025). Is marriage ‘just a paper’? Why men and women choose cohabitation over marriage in the Philippines: insights from focus group data. Genus, 81(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-025-00263-2
Manen, M. van. (2007). Phenomenology of Practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19803
Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Two Decades of Stability and Change in Age at First Union Formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12090
Manning, W. D., & Cohen, J. A. (2012). Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Dissolution: An Examination of Recent Marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(2), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00960.
Manning, W. D., Cohen, J. A., & Smock, P. J. (2011). The Role of Romantic Partners, Family, and Peer Networks in Dating Couples’ Views About Cohabitation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26(1), 115–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558410376833
Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and Modeling Cohabitation: New Perspectives From Qualitative Data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00189.
Manning, W. D., Smock, P. J., Dorius, C., & Cooksey, E. (2014). Cohabitation Expectations Among Young Adults in the United States: Do They Match Behavior? Population Research and Policy Review, 33(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9316-3
May, C., & Finch, T. (2009). Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology, 43(3), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509103208
Midgley, J. (1995). Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=KT8WeO11uKAC
National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. https://www.naswma.org/page/71/Code-of-Ethics-of-the-National-Association-of-Social-Workers.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.co
Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or Networked? Future Directions for Ecological Systems Theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12018
Noorkamilah, N. (2021). Peran Mualaf Center Yogyakarta terhadap Keberfungsian Sosial Mualaf Perspektif Pekerjaan sosial. WELFARE : Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 10(1), 101–101. https://doi.org/10.14421/welfare.2021.101-02
Nurchakiki. (2016). Studi Kasus Perilaku Pelaku Kumpul Kebo Mahasiswa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 5(6). https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/fipbk/article/view/3303
Pardeck, J. (1988). An Ecological Approach for Social Work Practice. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.1855
Perelli-Harris, B., & Bernardi, L. (2015). Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture: Introduction to Special Collection: Demographic Research, 33, 701–732. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.25
Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berrington, A., Berghammer, C., Evans, A., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klärner, A., Lappegård, T., & Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research, 31, 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34
Putri, N. S. (2025). Moral Offenses Under Indonesian Criminal Code 2023 in Perspective of Religious Minority. Jurnal HAM, 16(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2025.16.61-76
Rauer, A. J., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2013). Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2159–2171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031845
Rhoades, G. K., Kamp Dush, C. M., Atkins, D. C., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Breaking up is hard to do: The impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023627
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009a). Couples’ Reasons for Cohabitation: Associations With Individual Well-Being and Relationship Quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08324388
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009b). The pre-engagement cohabitation effect: A replication and extension of previous findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014358
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2012). The impact of the transition to cohabitation on relationship functioning: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028316
Rogge, M. E., & Cox, M. E. (2001). The Person-in-Environment Perspective in Social Work Journals: A Computer-Assisted Content Analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 28(2), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v28n02_03
Ruihua, L., Hassan, N. C., Qiuxia, Z., Sha, O., & Jingyi, D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of social support on college students’ wellbeing and mental health. PLOS ONE, 20(7), e0325212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325212
Safitri, N. I., & Wahyudi, E. (2023). Kriminalisasi Perbuatan Kohabitasi dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(20), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8435113
Saheed, R. O., & Seedat-Khan, M. (2024). Cohabitation Attitudes and Behaviours of Undergraduate Students in Taraba State, Nigeria: The Mediating Role of Social Media and Peer Pressure. ABUAD Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 5(2), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.53982/ajsms.2024.0502.06-j
Saleebey, D. (1996). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice: Extensions and Cautions. Social Work, 41(3), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/41.3.296
Sassler, S. (2004). The Process of Entering into Cohabiting Unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00033.
Severiens, S. E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Academic and social integration and study progress in problem based learning. Higher Education, 58(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9181-x
Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An Appraisal of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.
Soponyono, E. (2013). Kebijakan Kriminalisasi “Kumpul Kebo” dalam Pembangunan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.42.2.2013.196-203
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding Versus Deciding: Inertia and the Premarital Cohabitation Effect. Family Relations, 55(4), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x
Sulistiyono, B., Purwadi, H., & Hartiwiningsih. (2018). Urgensi Kriminalisasi Kumpul Kebo (Cohabitation) dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17750
Turi, M., Servidio, R., Esposito, G., Tenuta, F., Montesano, L., De Giacomo, A., Valenti, A., Freda, M. F., Pagani, L. S., & Craig, F. (2025). Associations Between Social Functioning and Indicators of University Student Engagement. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(6), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15060099
Ungar, M. (2011). The social ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01067.x
Zhang, Y., & Axinn, W. G. (2022). Cohabitation dissolution and psychological distress among young adults: The role of parenthood and gender. Social Science Research, 102, 102626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102626
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Welfare: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
