Normalization of Student Cohabitation and Its Implications for Social Functioning: An Ecological Social Work Perspective from Jember, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/welfare.2025.141-03Keywords:
Kohabitasi, Mahasiswa, Perilaku, Normalisasi, Keberfungsian Sosial, Cohabitation, Student, Normalization, Social FunctionAbstract
Student cohabitation has become an increasingly visible phenomenon in university towns; however, it is often normatively framed as moral deviation or individual misconduct. Limited attention has been given to understanding cohabitation as a social–ecological process that shapes students’ social functioning, particularly from a social work perspective in non-Western contexts. This study aims to analyze the normalization of student cohabitation and its implications for social functioning through an ecological social work lens. Employing a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design, data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and document analysis involving students engaged in cohabitation, boarding house managers, and community actors in Sumbersari Village, Jember Regency, Indonesia. The data were analyzed thematically to capture the interactions among individual experiences, relational dynamics, and environmental structures. The findings indicate that student cohabitation is normalized through emotional closeness, practical considerations, and permissive housing environments. Students develop adaptive attitudes such as indifference to social judgment, personal rationalization, and selective disclosure of their relationships. Regarding social functioning, cohabitation produces ambivalent outcomes. On one hand, it strengthens emotional support and academic motivation; on the other, it may limit broader social engagement and increase emotional dependency, particularly when relational disruptions occur. This study demonstrates that student cohabitation should be understood as a social–ecological phenomenon rather than a purely individual choice. Its main contribution lies in advancing social work scholarship by positioning cohabitation as an issue of social functioning within a person-in-environment framework. The findings highlight the importance of preventive, community-based social work interventions in higher education settings, particularly those aimed at promoting healthy relationship literacy, emotional autonomy, and sustainable social support systems for students.
Keywords: student cohabitation, social functioning, ecological systems theory, normalization, social work
Kohabitasi mahasiswa merupakan fenomena yang semakin terlihat di kawasan pendidikan tinggi, namun masih kerap dipahami secara normatif sebagai penyimpangan moral atau persoalan individual. Kajian yang menempatkan kohabitasi sebagai proses sosial-ekologis yang memengaruhi keberfungsian sosial mahasiswa, khususnya dari perspektif pekerjaan sosial di konteks non-Barat, masih sangat terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses normalisasi kohabitasi mahasiswa serta implikasinya terhadap keberfungsian sosial melalui perspektif pekerjaan sosial berbasis ekologi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain fenomenologis. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi non-partisipan, dan studi dokumentasi terhadap mahasiswa pelaku kohabitasi, pengelola kos, serta aktor lingkungan di Kelurahan Sumbersari, Kabupaten Jember. Analisis data dilakukan secara tematik untuk menangkap interaksi antara pengalaman individual, dinamika relasional, dan struktur lingkungan sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kohabitasi mahasiswa dinormalisasi melalui kedekatan emosional, pertimbangan praktis, serta lingkungan hunian yang permisif. Mahasiswa mengembangkan sikap adaptif berupa ketidakpedulian terhadap penilaian sosial, rasionalisasi personal, dan keterbukaan selektif dalam mengelola relasi. Dari sisi keberfungsian sosial, kohabitasi menghasilkan dampak yang ambivalen. Di satu sisi, kohabitasi memperkuat dukungan emosional dan motivasi akademik; di sisi lain, praktik ini berpotensi membatasi partisipasi sosial yang lebih luas dan meningkatkan ketergantungan emosional, terutama ketika relasi mengalami gangguan. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa kohabitasi mahasiswa perlu dipahami sebagai fenomena sosial-ekologis, bukan sekadar pilihan individual. Kontribusi utama penelitian ini terletak pada penguatan perspektif pekerjaan sosial dengan memposisikan kohabitasi sebagai isu keberfungsian sosial dalam kerangka person-in-environment. Temuan penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya intervensi pekerjaan sosial yang bersifat preventif dan berbasis komunitas di lingkungan perguruan tinggi, khususnya dalam penguatan literasi relasi sehat, kemandirian emosional, dan sistem dukungan sosial mahasiswa yang berkelanjutan.
Kata kunci: kohabitasi mahasiswa, keberfungsian sosial, teori sistem ekologi, normalisasi sosial, pekerjaan sosial.
Abstract viewed: 29 times
|
References
Alfaruqy, M. Z., Dewi, A. C., & Emeralda, V. T. (2022). Konstruksi sosialisasi nilai: Perspektif remaja dan orang tuanya. Psychocentrum Review, 4(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.26539/pcr.41816
Anugerah, C. V. S. W. A. (2023). Peran mahasiswa Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam mengembalikan keberfungsian sosial perempuan korban kekerasan melalui metode group work. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 1(12).
Apriliani, F. T., Wibowo, H., Humaedi, S., & Irfan, M. (2020). Model keberfungsian sosial masyarakat pada kehidupan normal baru. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 2(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v2i2.29123
Ardiansyah, Sarinah, Susilawati, & Juanda. (2022). Kajian psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud. Jurnal Kependidikan, 7(1), 25–31. http://e-journallppmunsa.ac.id/index.php/kependidikan/article/view/912
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Azizah, W. N., Dewi, D. A., & Furnamasari, Y. F. (2021). Peran mahasiswa dalam menyadarkan masyarakat Indonesia untuk saling berintegrasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 8327–8334.
Badan Pusat Statistik Jawa Timur. (2022). Jumlah perguruan tinggi (negeri dan swasta) menurut kabupaten/kota. https://jatim.bps.go.id
Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177
Bogle, K. A. (2017). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus (2nd ed.). New York University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Burlian, P. (2021). Patologi sosial. PT Bumi Aksara.
Conley, C. S., Durlak, J. A., & Dickson, D. A. (2015). An evaluative review of outcome research on universal mental health promotion and prevention programs for higher education students. Journal of American College Health, 63(5), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1024047
Cooke, T. J., Mulder, C. H., & Thomas, M. (2020). Union formation, housing, and life course transitions. Demographic Research, 42, 95–124. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.4
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Danardana, A., & Setyawan, V. P. (2022). Kriminalisasi fenomena penyimpangan sosial kumpul kebo dalam perspektif hukum pidana. Justitia et Pax, 38(1), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v38i1.5713
Detik News. (2018, March 3). Razia kos di Jember, 7 pasangan mesum diamankan. https://news.detik.com
Eisenberg, D., Hunt, J., & Speer, N. (2013). Mental health in American colleges and universities. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31827ab077
Freud, S. (2016). Psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud (K. Bertens, Ed.; 2nd ed.). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hadian, V. A., Maulida, D. A., & Faiz, A. (2022). Peran lingkungan keluarga dalam pembentukan karakter. Journal of Education and Development, 10(1), 240–246.
Hafrida, H., Haryadi, H., Munandar, T. I., Rakhmawati, D., & Kadir, N. A. B. A. (2024). Students’ perception of the criminalization of cohabitation (kumpul kebo) in Indonesia. Jambe Law Journal, 7(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v7i1.340
Hisyam, C. J. (2021). Penyimpangan sosial: Tinjauan sosiologis. PT Bumi Aksara.
Inaku, R., & Paputungan, F. (2022). Affective theory according to experts. Journal of Education and Culture, 2(2), 2986–3012.
Irmayanti, N., & Zuroidah, A. (2024). Emotional dependency and self-esteem in dating violence victims: A systematic review. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 11, 314–332.
Kierkus, C. A., Johnson, B. R., & Hewitt, J. D. (2010). Cohabiting, family and community stressors, selection, and juvenile delinquency. Criminal Justice Review, 35(4), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016810379338
Krzyżanowski, M. (2020). Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193
Manning, W. D., & Cohen, J. A. (2012). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(2), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00960.x
Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2015). Cohabitation and marriage in young adulthood. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 646(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215591754
May, C., & Finch, T. (2009). Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices. Sociology, 43(3), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509103208
Midgley, J. (1997). Social welfare in global context. Sage Publications.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Payne, M. (2020). Modern social work theory (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Perelli-Harris, B., et al. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation. Demographic Research, 31, 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34
Rauer, A. J., Sabey, A. K., & Jensen, J. F. (2013). Romantic relationships and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032851
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Saleebey, D. (2013). The strengths perspective in social work practice (6th ed.). Pearson.
Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2017). Cohabitation nation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12364
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Sliding versus deciding. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021323
Wieteska, M. (2018). Marriage vs cohabitation. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 9(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20181.27.35
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Welfare: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).









