Board Chairman Characteristics and Performance of Islamic Banks: Evidence From Islamic Banks in Indonesia and Malaysia

Authors

  • Ayatullah Quddus Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Imron Utama Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Samsul Rosadi Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Aryani Rahmawati Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/jai.2024.3.2.072-083

Keywords:

Chairman Characteristics, Islamic Banks, Performance, Age, Gender, Education, Indonesia, Malaysia

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of chairman characteristics—specifically age, gender, and education level—on the performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia. The motivation for this research stems from the limited and mixed findings in existing literature regarding the role of leadership traits in shaping bank performance, especially in the context of Islamic banking. This research aims to fill the gap by analyzing how these specific characteristics influence the strategic decisions and overall performance of banks in these two countries, which are home to some of the largest Islamic banks globally. The key finding of this study is that while the age of the chairman significantly impacts performance, gender and education level do not show a notable effect.

Methodology: The study employed a quantitative research methodology, using panel data from Islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia from 2015-2020. A panel data regression model was utilized to assess the influence of chairman characteristics on bank performance based on financial indicators such as return on assets (ROA). Data were collected from publicly available financial reports over a period of several years, and the characteristics of each chairman, such as age, gender, and education level, were analyzed in relation to these performance.

Findings: The results of the regression analysis show that the age of the chairman has a significant positive relationship with bank performance. Older chairmen appear to contribute to better decision-making and long-term strategy formulation, which in turn improves the performance of Islamic banks. However, the gender and education level of the chairman were found to have no significant impact on the performance of these banks during the research period. This suggests that experience, reflected in age, plays a more crucial role than gender or educational background in determining bank performance. 

Novelty: This study provides valuable insights into the role of leadership chairman characteristics in Islamic banks, with a focus on the importance of age as a key predictor of bank performance. By contrasting the effect of age with gender and education, this research contributes to the ongoing debate about leadership in the financial sector. The novelty lies in its focus on the specific context of Islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia, offering a regional perspective on how leadership traits influence bank success. Future research could further explore additional leadership traits or examine a larger dataset across different regions to strengthen these findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract viewed: 47 times | PDF downloaded = 30 times

References

Al Quddus, A., Aji, Y. K., Rosadi, S., & Asisyah, H. N. (2023). Apakah pendidikan direksi dapat meningkatkan kinerja bank syariah? SIMBA: Seminar Inovasi Manajemen, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 5.

Al-Absy, M. S. M. (2020). The board chairman’s characteristics and financial stability of Malaysian-listed firms. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1823586. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1823586

Al-Matari, Y. A. (2022). Do the characteristics of the board chairman have an effect on corporate performance? Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Heliyon, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09286

Al-Sayani, Y. M., Al-Matari, E. M., Nor, M. N. M., Amran, N. A., & Alsayani, M. A. (2023). Board chairman characteristics and impression management: an empirical investigation. Further analysis. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, ahead-of-print.

Amran, N. A., Yusof, M. M., Ishak, R., & Aripin, N. (2014). Do characteristics of CEO and chairman influence government-linked companies performance? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 799–803.

Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107–124.

Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.

Bhagat, S., Bolton, B. J., & Subramanian, A. (2010). CEO education, CEO turnover, and firm performance. Available at SSRN 1670219.

Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.

Chandren, S., Qaderi, S. A., & Ghaleb, B. A. A. (2021). The influence of the chairman and CEO effectiveness on operating performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1935189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1935189

Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.

Farag, H., Mallin, C., & Ow-Yong, K. (2018). Corporate governance in Islamic banks: New insights for dual board structure and agency relationships. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 59–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.002

Fernandes, C., Farinha, J., Martins, F. V., & Mateus, C. (2021). The impact of board characteristics and CEO power on banks’ risk-taking: stable versus crisis periods. Journal of Banking Regulation, 22(4), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-021-00146-4

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Citeseer.

Gupta, N., & Mahakud, J. (2020). CEO characteristics and bank performance: evidence from India. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(8), 1057–1093.

Hakimi, A., Rachdi, H., Ben Selma Mokni, R., & Hssini, H. (2018). Do board characteristics affect bank performance? Evidence from the Bahrain Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-06-2015-0029

Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

Hazzaa, O. T., Abdullah, D. F., & Sadaa, A. M. (2024). Influence of CEO characteristics and audit committee on financial performance: Evidence from Iraq. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100290

Hertrampf, P., Brunner-Kirchmair, T. M., Hiebl, M. R. W., & Wiedemann, A. (2024). The Relationship Between CEO Characteristics and Banks’ Risk-Taking: Review and Research Directions. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-024-00199-x

King, T., Srivastav, A., & Williams, J. (2016). What’s in an education? Implications of CEO education for bank performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 37, 287–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.01.003

Le, T. D. Q., Ho, T. H., Ngo, T., & Luu, T. B. (2024). Recognizing CEOs and Chairmen’s personality and bank performance: new insights from signature analysis. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 1–27. 10.1080/14765284.2024.2334552

Leblanc, R. W. (2005). Assessing board leadership. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(5), 654–666.

McNulty, T., Pettigrew, A., Jobome, G., & Morris, C. (2011). The role, power and influence of company chairs. Journal of Management & Governance, 15, 91–121.

Moreno-Gómez, J., Lafuente, E., & Vaillant, Y. (2018). Gender diversity in the board, women’s leadership and business performance. Gender in Management: An International Journal.

OJK, R. I. (2021). Laporan Perkembangan Keuangan Syariah Indonesia. Ojk.

Okoyeuzu, C., Ujunwa, A., Ujunwa, A. I., & Onah, E. O. (2021). Independent board, gender diversity and bank performance in Nigeria: a system-GMM approach. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 36(6), 677–696.

Pasaribu, P. (2015). The examinations of board chairman characteristics and board diversity: evidence from the UK listed firms.

Pham, N. H. (2023). CEO characteristics and bank performance: Case of Vietnamese commercial banks. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2162687.

Plian, P. H. (1995). Human capital or social networks: What constrains CEO dismissals? Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995(1), 37–41.

Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53.

Talha, M., & Salim, A. S. A. (2011). Chairman statement characteristics and firms performance: a study of Malaysian construction companies. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 3(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2011.039496

Tanaka, T. (2019). Gender diversity on Japanese corporate boards. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 51(C), 19–31.

Xiong, J. (2016). Chairman characteristics and earnings management: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Open Journal of Accounting, 5(4), 82–94.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

Quddus, A., Utama, I., Rosadi, S., & Rahmawati, A. (2024). Board Chairman Characteristics and Performance of Islamic Banks: Evidence From Islamic Banks in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Accounting Inquiry, 3(2), 072–083. https://doi.org/10.14421/jai.2024.3.2.072-083

Issue

Section

Articles