Konstruksi Identitas Citizenship pada Muslim di Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Muhammad Johan Nasrul Huda Prodi Psikologi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.2016.42-03

Keywords:

citizenship, Yogyakarta Muslim, transformation of social categorization

Abstract

Muslim is large social identity which represent to citizenship identification in Indonesia contexts. The dynamic of Yogyakarta Muslim that have special status is intersting to investigate about how they construct citizenship identity. The research used qualitative approach in which etnography and fenomenology as tool to understand of psychocultural reality that is main object in the research. Subjects are two elits of Muslim community in Yogyakarta. Data collection used depth interview and obeservation of participant to cover the problems. The result describes that Muslim construct their citizenship identity with extending of Islamic teaching categorization and elaboration in both of cultural and national. That is against to Turner’opinion which said that citizenship will be luck by religous identification. Furthermore Yogyakarta Muslim have been meaning of citizenship identity as transformative process from primodial categorization into inclusive categorization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. California. Sage Publications

Emily, S. (2003).The Role of Social Identity in Resistance to International Criminal Law: The Case of Serbia and the ICTY.Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley.

Haslam, A. S. (2001). Psychology in Organzation (The Social Identity Approach). New Delhi. Sage Publication.

Hogg, M., Abrams, D., Otten, S., Hinkle,S. (2004). “The Social Identity Perspective Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups”.Small Group Research,Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 246-2 Sage Publication.

Jaspars, J.M.F. & Warnaen, S. (1979). Intergroup relations, ethnic Identity and Self-evaluation in Indonesia. Henry Tajfel (eds). Social Identity and Intergroup relation.Cambride University Press. London.

Julian, O., Foddy, M. Platow, M, J. (2005).Task-Groups as Self-Categories: A Social Identity Perspective on Status Generalization. http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp.html

Kelman, H.C. and Hamilton, V. L. Crimes of Obdience: Toward a Social Psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Marshall, T.H (1950). Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays (Cambridge University Press).

Munawwar-Rachman, B. (2011). Reorientasi Pembaharuan Islam; Sekularisme, Liberalisme, dan PluralismeParadigma Baru Islam Indonesia.Yayasan Abad Demokrasi. Jakarta

Padilla, A. M., Perez, W. (2003).“Acculturation, Social Identity, andSocial Cognition: A New Perspective”, Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 35-55.

Phol, F. (2007).Interrelligous Harmony and Peacebuilding in Indonesia Islamic Education. C.J. Montiel, N.M.Noor (eds). Peace Psychology in Asia. Peace Psychology Books Series.

Stets, J. E. B., Peter, J. IdentityTheory And Social Identity Theory.Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman.

Taher,E. P (eds.). (2011). Merayakan Kebebasan Beragama; Bunga Rampai Menyambut 70 tahun Djohan Efendi.Yayasan Abad Demokrasi. Jakarta

Tajfel.H. (1979).Social Identity and intergroup relation. Sydney. Cambrid University Press.

Turner, B.S. (1989). Outline of a Theory of Citizenship; Sociology, 24,pp, 180-217

Turner. C. John & Giles H. (1981). IntergroupBehavior. Oxford. UK

Downloads

Published

2017-09-29

How to Cite

Konstruksi Identitas Citizenship pada Muslim di Yogyakarta. (2017). Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 4(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.2016.42-03