POLITICAL COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC SPHERE DEMOCRACY (AN ANALYSIS: THE HASHTAGS USAGE OF REJECTION THE OMNIBUS LAW 2020 ON TWITTER)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v14i1.2106Keywords:
Political Communication, Public Sphere, Democracy, Omnibus Law, HashtagsAbstract
In academic research, the Internet and the public domain's topic now has a permanent place; it is entering the mainstream of political communication studies. The coming out of the same ideas and opinions with social media can build a discourse for further discussion. One of the viral and trending discourses on Indonesian twitter was the rejection of OMNIBUSLAW; many people issued opinions using the hashtags #MosiTidakPercaya and #Tolakomnibuslaw, which emerged as a result of the passing of the omnibus law, which contains many irregularities in its ratification. This research was conducted by taking data on Twitter in October 2020 and processed using the Nvivo 12 Plus software. The results of this study indicate that the social media using twitter as information is 25%, where the public uses Twitter as a means of seeking information on the Job Creation Bill in its development process and its rejection in it, political communication is 48%, communication that is built has an interest in running political goals and as a movement. 25% of politics in pressuring the government and forming public opinion on the Work Creation Bill and a place for public space to communicate can be seen in the public space that people are interested in voicing their anxieties if there is a disagreement of opinion between stakeholders and the wider community.
Downloads
References
Akmal, M. (2018). The Roles of Digital Democracy on Political Education for Young Generation. Emeraldinsight, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00071
Alfiyani, N. (2018). Media Sosial Sebagai Strategi Komunikasi Politik. Potret Pemikiran, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.30984/pp.v22i1.762
Anggono, B. D. (2020). Peluang Adopsi Dan Tantangannya Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. 9(April), 17–37.
Anggraeni, R., & Rachman, C. I. L. (2020). Omnibus Law in Indonesia: Is That the Right Strategy? 140(Icleh), 180–182. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.038
Arham, S., Saleh, A., & Kunci, K. (2019). Omnibus Law Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia. Uit.E-Journal.Id, 7(2), 72–81.
Astuti, Y. D. (2018). Eksistensi Public Sphere Dalam Media Mainstream: Studi Pada Rubrik Citizen Journalism Tribun Yogyakarta. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 12(2), 233-250.
Aulianida, D., Liestyasari, S. I., & Ch, S. R. (2019). Omnibus Law Sebagai Sarana Utama Penataan Regulasi. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Barnidge, M. (2017). Exposure to Political Disagreement in Social Media Versus Face-to-Face and Anonymous Online Settings. Political Communication, 34(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1235639
Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2015). Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the Sopa-Pipa Debate. Political Communication, 32(4), 594–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.986349
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
Bimber, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media and Society, 22(4), 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980
Budiyono. (2015). Fenomena Komunikasi Politik dalam Media Sosial Political Communication Phenomenon in Social Media. Fenomena Komunikasi Politik Dalam Media Sosial Political Communication Phenomenon in Social Media, 17(2), 18. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/227984-fenomena-komunikasi-politik-dalam-media-468e2387.pdf
Budiyono, M. (2016). Media Sosial Dan Komunikasi Politik: Media Sosial Sebagai Komunikasi Politik Menjelang Pilkada Dki Jakarta 2017. Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol11.iss1.art4
Cropf, R. A. (2008). Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Social Science Computer Review, 26(2), 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713807301373
Del Valle, M. E., Sijtsma, R., Stegeman, H., & Borge, R. (2020). Online Deliberation and the Public Sphere: Developing a Coding Manual to Assess Deliberation in Twitter Political Networks. Javnost, 27(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2020.1794408
Dwi, M., Mutiarin, D., Arie, H., & Rahmatika, I. (2020). Smart Village Accountability : Comparative Study in Management BUMDes Tirta Mandiri and BUMDes Giritama As a Village Income Earner in 2018. 5(April), 20–46.
Kasmani, M. F., Sabran, R., & Ramle, N. (2014). Can Twitter be an Effective Platform for Political Discourse in Malaysia? A Study of #PRU13. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155(October), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.304
Kim, D. Y. (2018). Transforming western democracy in southeast Asia: The case of lanao del sur, the Philippines. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 14(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2018.14.1.5
Kristiyanto, E. N. (2020). The Urgency of Omnibus Law to Accelerate Regulatory Reform in The Perspective of Progressive Law. De Jure, 20(10), 233–244.
Lance Bennett, W., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the U.S. Political Communication, 25(3), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802197434
Leeper, T. J. (2020). Raising the Floor or Closing the Gap? How Media Choice and Media Content Impact Political Knowledge. Political Communication, 00(00), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1753866
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Parkinson, J., Fung, A., Thompson, D., & Warren, M. (2012). A systematic appraoch to deliberative democracy. Deliberative Systems : Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, 1–41. http://www.worldcat.org/title/deliberative-systems-deliberative-democracy-at-the-large-scale/oclc/784577135&referer=brief_results%5Cnhttp://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item6796478/?site_locale=en_GB
Meesuwan, S. (2016). The effect of Internet use on political participation: Could the Internet increase political participation in Thailand? International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 12(2), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2016.12.2.3
Park, C. S. (2019). Learning Politics From Social Media: Interconnection of Social Media Use for Political News and Political Issue and Process Knowledge. Communication Studies, 70(3), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1581627
Pooi Yin Leong, P. (2019). Malaysian Politics in the New Media Age. In Malaysian Politics in the New Media Age. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8783-8
Salgado, S. (2014). The media of political communication. Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238174.269
Saputra, H. A., Mutiarin, D., & Nurmandi, A. (2020). Analisis Wacana Partisipasi Perempuan dalam Politik di Indonesia Tahun 2018 - 2019. MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender, 110, 89–110. https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v12i1.2502
Shaul-Cohen, S., & Lev-On, A. (2020). Smartphones, text messages, and political participation. Mobile Media and Communication, 8(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918822143
Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
Sujoko, A. (2019). Komunikasi Politik Gerakan #2019GantiPresiden. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 9(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2019.9.1.36-57
Susanto, E. H. (2017). Media Sosial Sebagai Pendukung Jaringan Komunikasi Politik. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(3), 379. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i3.123
Tomaselli, K. G., & Teer-Tomaselli, R. E. (2009). The Palgrave Macmilan Series In International Political Communication: Africa Media and the Digital Public Sphere (O. F. Mudhai, W. J. Tettey, & F. Banda (eds.)). Palgrave Macmillan.
Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2020). Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media. Political Communication, 00(00), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi by submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Profetik's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Profetik permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Profetik on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy), The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Profetik will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Profetik will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Profetik entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Profetik will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Profetik's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
