DISCLOSING BEHIND MOSQUE AND MUSALLA LOUDSPEAKER POLICY REPORT: ANALYSIS OF KOMPAS.COM AND DETIK.COM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v16i2.2628Keywords:
Loudspeaker Policy, Agenda Setting, Content Analysis, MediaAbstract
Mosques and Musalla Loudspeakers Policy, and the analogy of the azan with barking dogs by the Minister of Religion, Yaqut Cholil Qoumas has drawn pros and cons from various party. The pros and cons are inseparable from the influence of online news media. This study tries to answer questions related to news tendencies and the background of the pros and cons of the Policy Guidelines for Using Loudspeakers in Mosques and Musalla. This study analyzes news related to Mosques and Musalla's loudspeaker Policy on the two most influential online news media in Indonesia based on SEMRUSH, namely Kompas.com, and Detik.com. Content analysis is used for this study, carried out two weeks after the policy was issued, from February 21 to March 6, 2022. The study results found that The informant's affiliation greatly contributes to providing a pro or con statement. News tendency is influenced by who and what interests are behind these two big media. This reporting trend is shown through the appointed Informants, the titles and narratives presented, and the topics of news discussion. The causes of the pros and cons of the Minister of Religion's policy are due to differences in perceptions in interpreting the policies and statements of the Minister of Religion Yaqut Cholil Qoumas by the informants.
Downloads
References
Achmad, R. F., Febrianita, R., Permatasari, M. S., & Fay Wong, C. D. (2022). Refleksi Demokrasi di Indonesia: Demonstrasi Menolak UU Cipta Kerja dalam Media Berita Online. JCommsci - Journal Of Media and Communication Science, 5(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcommsci.v5i1.156
Alrizki, D., & Aslinda, C. (2022). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Indonesia Tidak Lockdown di kompas.com dan detik.com. Journal of Political Communication and Media, 1(1), 24–36. https://journal.rc-communication.com/index.php/JPCM/article/view/20
Annisa, H., & Ulfatun Najicha, F. (2021). Wawasan Nusantara Dalam Mememcahkan Konflik Kebudayaan Nasional. Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 10(2), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.33061/jgz.v10i2.5615
Billah, F. I., & Febrianita, R. (2023). Dinamika Kebijakan Kementerian Agama Tentang Larangan Penggunaan Pengeras Suara Masjid (Analisis Framing Pada Kompas.Com Dan Detik.Com). NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 10 (3), 1010–1016.
Celik, I., Muukkonen, H., & Dogan, S. (2021). A model for understanding new media literacy: Epistemological beliefs and social media use. Library and Information Science Research, 43(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101125
Cho, H., Cannon, J., Lopez, R., & Li, W. (2022). Social media literacy: A conceptual framework. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530
Chung, M. (2017). Not just numbers: The role of social media metrics in online news evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 949–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.022
Darmiyati Zuchdi, E. D., & Afifah, W. (2021). Analisis Konten Etnografi & Grounded Theory, dan Hermeneutika Dalam Penelitian (Vol. 314). Bumi Aksara. PT Bumi Aksara. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=YoM_EAAAQBAJ%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PP1%5C&dq=analisis+konten%5C&ots=ckQA1Bd3p9%5C&sig=rxnkkOMyT-PV3h_IOd_JgInx2uY
Febriandi, F. (2018). Agama, Ritual, Dan Konflik: Suatu Upaya Memahami Konflik Internal Umat Beragama Di Indonesia. Handep, 2, 121–142.
Flew, T. (2005). New Media an Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Fortington, L. V., Bekker, S., & Finch, C. F. (2018). Online news media reporting of football-related fatalities in Australia: A matter of life and death. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21(3), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.06.015
Geiß, S. (2022a). The Agenda-Setting-Effects of News Factor Exposure: A Field Study Comparing the Transmission Paths and Impact of Issue Exposure and News Factor Exposure. Sage Pub, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221091259
Geiß, S. (2022b). The Media’s Conditional Agenda-Setting Power: How Baselines and Spikes of Issue Salience Affect Likelihood and Strength of Agenda-Setting. Communication Research, 49(2), 296–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219874968
Habibie, D. K. (2018). Dwi Fungsi Media Massa. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.7.2.79-86
Irom, B., Borah, P., Vishnevskaya, A., & Gibbons, S. (2022). News Framing of the Rohingya Crisis: Content Analysis of Newspaper Coverage from Four Countries. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 20(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2021.1906472
Karolina, C. M., & Zarkasi, I. R. (2022). Pros and Cons of Vaccine Refusal in Social Media. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 7(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v7i1.1062
Krippendorff, K. (2022). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. In Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Kurniawan, A., & Fitri, E. (2022). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Buzzer di tempo . co. 1(1), 1–15.
Langer, A. I., & Gruber, J. B. (2021). Political Agenda Setting in the Hybrid Media System: Why Legacy Media Still Matter a Great Deal. International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220925023
Lee, N. Y. (2021). How agenda setting works: A dual path model and motivated reasoning. Journalism, 22(9), 2279–2296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919851882
Mahfud, M., Ghofur, A., & Musyafak, N. (2022). Prevention of Intolerance Through Implementation of Islamic Communication in Religious Moderation. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 15(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v15i1.2415
Malik, R., Sultan, M. I., & Kahar, K. (2017). Konstruksi Realitas Pemilukada Di Media Online (Analisis Framing Berita Tribun Timur Online Tentang Pemilukada Kabupaten Takalar). KAREBA : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.31947/kjik.v6i2.5340
Munif, A. (2018). Potret Masyarakat Multikultural di Indonesia. Journal Multicultural of Islamic Education, 2(1), 1–10. https://jurnal.yudharta.ac.id/v2/index.php/ims/article/view/1219
Mupida, S. (2019). Media Baru Dan Konflik Politik Islam Di Indonesia. Idarotuna, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24014/idarotuna.v2i1.8185
Muthaqin, F., Syam, H. M., & Wahyuni, P. (2021). Ideologi Media dan Framing Pada Pemberitaan Perusakan Rumah Ibadah di Kompas dan Republika. Jurnal Peurawi: Media Kajian Komunikasi Islam, 4(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.22373/jp.v4i2.10821
Nancy Alicia Nelwan, J. L. L. J. H. L. (2023). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Kontroversi Pengaturan Pengeras Suara Masjid Pada Media Online Detik.Com Dan Republika.Co.Id. 5(1).
Pramana, fajar rachman, & Setia, P. (2020). Analisis Sentimen Pro dan Kontra Masyarakat Indonesia tentang Vaksin COVID-19 pada Media Sosial Twitter. Health Information Management Journal, 8(2), 100–109. https://inohim.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/INO/article/view/223/175
Prawira, I., Irawan, R. E., Muslikhin, Evelina, L. W., & Rizkiansyah, M. (2021). The media agenda-setting on Indonesian forest fires: Content analysis study on three Indonesia online news media. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 729(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012082
Rahmadiva, L. A., Alia, R. B., & Ruslanjari, D. (2023). Upaya Pemerintah Melawan Infodemic dengan Membangun Informasi Akurat. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 21 (2), 241–258.
Rahmawati, B., & Muhid, A. (2019). Analisis Wacana Kritis Di Media Sosial (Studi Pada Fenomena Pro-Kontra Penolakan Dakwah Ustadz Abdul Somad). Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 20(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v20i1.9608
Rahmawati, D., Mulyana, D., Lumakto, G., Viendyasari, M., & Anindhita, W. (2021). Mapping Disinformation During the Covid-19 in Indonesia: Qualitative Content Analysis. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 6(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v6i2.907
Rosenberg, H., Syed, S., & Rezaie, S. (2020). The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22(4), 418–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2020.361
Rustam, M. (2022). Analisis Isi Pro Kontra Pemberitaan Media Massa di Harian Fajar terhadap Kebijakan Di Rumah Saja. LONTAR: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.30656/lontar.v10i1.3028
Safitri, T. S., & Atikurrahman, M. (2023). Anjing Menggonggong Muazin Berlalu: Toa Masjid, Gus Yaqut, dan Semiotika Morris. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.v4i2.6753
Saputra, E., Syahputra, I., & Setyo, B. (2020). Pemberitaan Media Online: Studi Kasus Konflik Budaya “Sedekah Laut” Di Pantai Baru, Ngentak, Bantul, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v9i2.17542
Sirait, F. E. T. (2021). Policy Communication and the Solidity of the Jokowi’s Second Term Coalition in Handling Covid-19. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.257-268
Stephen W. Littlejohn, Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2012). THEORIES OF HUMAN COMMUNICATION Eleventh Edition. In Waveland Press, Inc. (Vol. 53, Issue 95). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Sucipta, A. W., & Kurniawan, R. C. (2021). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Media Online Detik.com dan Kompas.com Mengenai Kebijakan Kaltim Silent. Jurnal An-Nida, 13(1).
Tihul, I. (2021). Asbab Nuzul Qs Al-Hujurat Ayat 13 (Sebuah Metodologis Pendekatan Pendidikan Multikultural). Jurnal Media Informasi Dan Komunikasi Ilmiah, 3(2), 158–169.
Tomaselli, K. G., & Tomaselli, D. R. (2021). New media: Ancient signs of literacy, modern signs of tracking. New Techno Humanities, 1(1–2), 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techum.2021.100002
Torres, R. R., Gerhart, N., & Negahban, A. (2018). Epistemology in the era of fake news: An exploration of information verification behaviors among social networking site users. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 49(3), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242734.3242740
Wibisono, Y. (2021). Agama dan Resolusi Konflik. In LeKKaS: Vol. Maret (Issue June).
Wonneberger, A., & Vliegenthart, R. (2021). Agenda-Setting Effects of Climate Change Litigation: Interrelations Across Issue Levels, Media, and Politics in the Case of Urgenda Against the Dutch Government. Environmental Communication, 15(5), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1889633
Workman, M. (2014). New media and the changing face of information technology use: The importance of task pursuit, social influence, and experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.008
Yu, S., Abbas, J., Draghici, A., Negulescu, O. H., & Ain, N. U. (2022). Social Media Application as a New Paradigm for Business Communication: The Role of COVID-19 Knowledge, Social Distancing, and Preventive Attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903082
Zattullah, N. (2021). Konflik Sunni-Syiah Di Sampang Ditinjau Dari Teori Segitiga Konflik Johan Galtung. 86 | Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 9(1), 86–102. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-
Zhang, R. (2021). How media politicize COVID-19 lockdowns: a case study comparing frame use in the coverage of Wuhan and Italy lockdowns by The New York Times. Media Asia, 48(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2021.1884518
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi by submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Profetik's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Profetik permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Profetik on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy), The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Profetik will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Profetik will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Profetik entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Profetik will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Profetik's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.