Internalizing The Values of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika among The Mediatized Young Generation Ahead of The 2024 Elections
Main Article Content
Abstract
Internalizing the values of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika is crucial to explore further, especially in the context of Indonesia's diverse society. Various perspectives of young people in considering the 2024 presidential candidates in Indonesia have the potential to cause division. This article addresses three key points: firstly, the importance of internalizing the values of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika in creating a peaceful elections atmosphere; secondly, factors influencing the young generation’s responses to the 2024 elections; thirdly, implications of implementing the values of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika on the behavior of young voters in the 2024 elections. Using a mixed method approach, with data collected through surveys and analyzed qualitatively, this study revealed three key points. First, internalizing the values of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika is essential to foster peaceful elections in 2024. Second, socializing the implementation of the values of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika is one of factors that could influence the behavior of young voters in creating peaceful elections in 2024. Third, the internalization of these values could lead the young generation to adopt more inclusive and tolerant perspective on political issues. However, the complexity produced by mediatization do not fully reflect the high awareness of the values of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. Best practices for the young generation are expected to be able to implement the values of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika consistently in social life and the democratic process, including tolerance for differences of opinion, diversity, and harmony in various perspectives
Article Details
License
Please find the rights and licenses in Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi by submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Profetik's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Profetik permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Profetik on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy), The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Profetik will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Profetik will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Profetik entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Profetik will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Profetik's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
References
REFERENCES
Abdulatif, S., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Peranan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dalam Membina Sikap Toleransi Antar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 103–109. http://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jppguseda
Agustin, D. S. Y., Suarmini, N. W., & Prabowo, S. (2015). Peran Keluarga Sangat Penting dalam Pendidikan Mental, Karakter Anak serta Budi Pekerti Anak. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 8(1), 46–54.
Al-Hamdi, R., & Sofyan, N. (2023). To What Extent Political Education Can Influence Young Voters’ Perceptions? Journal of Government and Civil Society, 7(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31000/ jgcs.v7i1.7259
Amanda, M. D., & Lexianingrum, S. R. P. (2024). Analisis Framing Media Sosial Terhadap Opini Publik Dalam Konteks Pemilu. IJM: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary, 2(4), 346–353. https://journal.csspublishing/index.php/ijm
Andini, A. T., & Yahfizham. (2024). Analisis Algoritma Pemrograman Dalam Media Sosial Terhadap Pola Konsumsi Konten. Jurnal Arjuna : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Matematika, 2(1), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.61132/arjuna.v2i1.523
Anwar, R. N. (2022). Peran Mata Kuliah Modul Nusantara Dalam Peningkatan Sikap Toleransi Mahasiswa Program Pertukaran Mahasiswa Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 10(2), 646–655. https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v1i2.471
Arslanagić, S., & Mitrović, M. (2022). Electoral Preferences of Youth Voters in Bosnia and Herzegovina. MAP Social Sciences, 2(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.53880/2744-2454.2022.2.1.28
Astuti, A. D., Farida, M. W. N., & Fuadah, A. (2020). Menerapkan Sikap Dan Perilaku Yang Berprinsip Pada Bhinneka Tunggal Ika Di Era 4.0 Dalam Pembelajaran K13 Di MI/SD Kelas IV. JMIE : Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education, 4(1), 86–99. http://e-journal.adpgmiindonesia.com/index.php/jmie
Astuti, P. A. A., & Hangsing, P. (2018). Predicting the Behavior of Young Voters in Elections: A Case Study of Governor Elections in Jakarta, Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3404-21
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin Group.
Bhinneka Tunggal Ika dan Integrasi Nasional (Cahyono, Ma’ruf). (2014). Pusat Pengkajian MPR RI.
Budiasa, M. (2017). Mediatisasi Aksi Massa Islam 2 Desember 2016. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 10(01), 35–49. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v10i1.1220
Budijarto, A. (2018). Pengaruh Perubahan Sosial Terhadap Nilai-Nilai yang Terkandung Dalam Pancasila. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 34, 5–21.
Budiman, B. N. (2021). Populisme di Indonesia sebagai Ancaman Polarisasi Masyarakat. Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 01(02), 235–246.
Cloudry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Polity Press.
Darmawan, C., Syaifullah, & Anggraeni, L. (2016). The Development of Civic Engagement to Empower Student Potential Through Entrepreneurial Student Program (PMW). UPI International Conference on Sociology Education, 385–388. www.upi.edu
Dharma, F. A. (2018). The Social Construction of Reality: Peter L. Berger’s Thoughts About Social Reality. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 1–9.
Fatimah, S. (2018). Kampanye sebagai Komunikasi Politik: Esensi dan Strategi dalam Pemilu. Resolusi: Jurnal Sosial Politik, 1(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.32699/resolusi.v1i1.154
Fitriani, N. (2024, February 13). Pemilu 2024: Gen Z dan Milenial Sumbang 55 Persen Suara, ini fakta lengkapnyaPemilu 2024: Gen Z dan Milenial Sumbang 55 Persen Suara, ini fakta lengkapnya. Open Data Jabar. https://opendata.jabarprov.go.id/id/artikel/pemilu-2024-gen-z-dan-milenial-sumbang-55-persen-suara-ini-fakta-lengkapnya
Hakim, D. A. (2022). Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Agama Islam melalui Metode Pembiasaan Siswa Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(12), 1231–1251. https://doi.org/10.36418/comserva.v1i12.197
Hariyanto, D. (2021). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. UMSIDA PRESS.
Haryanto. (2018). Sosialisasi Politik: Suatu Pemahaman Awal. PolGow. http://jpp.fisipol.ugm.ac.id
Hayati, N. N. (2021). Urgensi Pelibatan Generasi Muda Dalam Pengawasan Partisipatif Untuk Pemilu Serentak Tahun 2024 Yang Demokratis. Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu, 1, 23–34.
Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Kebangsaan Yang Bersumber Dari Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. (2023). Lemhannas RI.
Jati, S. D. N., Soeprapto, A., & Loy, N. (2022). Konten Pesan Pemilihan Umum dalam Perspektif Pemilih Pemula. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 20(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v20i3.8239
Johnson, Degodona, P. L. P., Tobing, A. L., Hutasoit, R., Gulo, T., Simangunsong, R. M. B., & Siagian, L. (2024). Sosialisasi Komunikasi Politik Dan Pendidikan Politik Untuk Pemilu Damai 2024 Bagi Masyarakat Di Jalan Sekata Kelurahan Sei Agul Kecamatan Medan Barat Kota Medan. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Nusantara, 5(1), 990–993. https://doi.org/10.55338/jpkmn.v5i1.2824
Leavy, & Patricia. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.
Maryono. (2023). Implementasi Nilai Keharmonisan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika: Pembelajaran Bagi Pemilu Dan Pilkada Serentak 2024. Knowledge: Jurnal Inovasi Hasil Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 3(2), 141–146.
Maualana, N., & Danugroho, A. (2023). Pemaknaan Kembali Bhinneka Tunggal Ika Sebagai Sesanti Negara Indonesia. Journal of Humanities and Civic Education, 1(1), 1–8.
Melasari, F., Detasari, M., Sriwulan, F., Verliansyah, R., Santi, L., Ariko, R. S., & Reski, O. T. (2021). Bentuk Toleransi Antar Umat Beragama Dalam Menjaga Identitas Nasional dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. IJOCE: Indonesia Journal of Civic Education, 2(1), 8–12.
Mivadila, M., Chatra, E., & Ariany, R. (2018). Proses Komunikasi Dalam Sosialisasi Pilgub Sumatera Barat Tahun 2015. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(2), 05–16. https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v11i2.1477
Muhamad, N. (2024, January 30). Ramai Narasi Kuliah dan Dukungan Capres-Cawapres di Twitter, Bagaimana Sentimennya? Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2024/01/30/ramai-narasi-kuliah-dan-dukungan-capres-cawapres-di-twitter-bagaimana-sentimennya
Muhtar, & Supriadi. (2021). Membangun Komunikasi Efektif Dalam Kegiatan Pembelajaran Pada Tingkat Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam: Pendekatan Interdisipliner, 5(2), 76–85.
Noffiyanti. (2020). Mewujudkan Keharmonisan Rumah Tangga Dengan Menggunakan Konseling Keluarga. Al-Ittizaan: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 3(1), 8–12.
Nurhadi, Z. F., & Kurniawan, A. W. (2017). Kajian Tentang Efektivitas Pesan Dalam Komunikasi. Komunikasi Hasil Pemikiran Dan Penelitian, 3(1), 90–95.
Pertiwi, A. D., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Implementasi Nilai Pancasila Sebagai Landasan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 212–221.
Pursika, I. N. (2009). Kajian Analitik Terhadap Semboyan “Bhinneka Tunggal Ika.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 42(1), 15–20.
Rakhmawati, Y. (2019). Komunikasi Fatik Komunitas Public Speaking dalam Persuasi Kompetensi Komunikasi. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 12(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v12i1.1548
Rekker, R. (2022). Young trendsetters: How young voters fuel electoral volatility. Electoral Studies, 75, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102425
Ruben, B. D., & Stewart, L. P. (2013). Komunikasi dan Perilaku Manusia. Rajawali Pers.
Sari, T. P. (2024). Analisis Peran Pancasila Dalam Membentuk Karakter Generasi Muda. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461
Siahaan, C. (2022). Transformasi Mediatisasi Informasi Dan Implikasinya Di Era Digital. UKI Press.
Simamora, I. Y., Nasution, A. A. M., Novita, D. D., Syahira, Z., Nazwa, W. S., & Siregar, R. A. (2024). Peran Generasi Z dalam Pemilu 2024 di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 5918–5922.
Sukendro, G. G., Pandrianto, N., Oktavianti, R., & Sari, W. P. (2022). Komunikasi Anak Muda untuk Perubahan Sosial. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. www.gpu.id
Sumantri, E., Darmawan, C., & Saefulloh. (2014). Generasi dan Generasi Muda. In Pembinaan Generasi Muda. Universitas Terbuka - Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Tajuddin, S. N. A. A., Joni, J., & Bahari, K. A. (2023). Political Communication: Uncovering Knowledge, Attitudes and Young Voters’ Readiness for PRU-15 in Batang Padang District, Perak. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(1), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3901-26
Widyatama, R., AW, S., & Mahbob, M. H. (2021). The Determinant Factors of Television’s Audience in Choosing TV Channel in the Disruptive Era. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 14(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v14i2.2372
Yuniar, R., & Ahsan, T. F. (2024). Internalizing Pancasila Values among the Young Generation in Jakarta in the Context of the 2024 Presidential Elections in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 9(1), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v9i1.1025
Yuniar, R., & Rahmah, I. (2024). Potret Masyarakat Perbatasan Papua: Interaksi, dan Penguatan Nilai-Nilai Kebangsaan Analisis Komunikasi. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 21(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v21i3.9209
Zubair, F., Dewi, R., & Kadarisman, A. (2018). Strategi Komunikasi Publik Dalam Membangun Pemahaman Mahasiswa Terhadap Penerapan PTNBH. Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(2), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v11i2.1328
Article Sidebar
Download Full Text
PDF