In today’s digital age, one of the most significant shifts in the field of Islam in Indonesia is the increasing reliance of Muslims on social media when practicing and expressing their faith and religiosity. The expressions generally reflected in the consumer behavior and everyday lives of Indonesian Muslims, with their preference for Islamic banking, Islamic schools, Islamic fashion, Islamic medicines and most importantly, today Indonesian Muslims like to present these practices on their social media accounts. However, public expressions of piety have been apparent in the political life of Indonesian Muslims as Indonesia’s political landscape has undergone significant changes after the controversy surrounding Jakarta Gubernatorial Election. Although religion has often been ignored as an important political factor, but it can’t be denied that both are actually the biggest public parts of many people’s lives. Therefore, this paper argues that political contexts are critical aspects of modern formations of piety. Based on online observations combined with computational method, this paper tries to analyzes intriguing examples of how social media, the religious, and the everyday politics intersect, focusing on contemporary expressions of piety through political attitudes in an online sphere.



Indonesia, Islam, Piety, Politics, Social Media


  1. Amir, S. 2009. A message from Ashabirin: high technology and political Islam in Indonesia. In F.K.G. Lim (ed.), Mediating piety: technology and religion in contemporary Asia. Leiden: Brill, pp. 73–90.
  2. Baek, Y. M., Wojcieszak, M., & Delli Carpini, M. X. 2012. Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects? New Media & Society, 14(3), 363–383.
  3. Bakshy E, Messing S, Adamic L. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook. Science. 348 (6239) pp. 1130-1132
  4. Borra, Erik, and Bernhard Rieder. 2014. "Programmed method: developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets", Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 66 Issue: 3, pp. 262-278.
  5. Brenner, Philip S. 2014. "Testing the Veracity of Self-Reported Religious Practice in the Muslim World." Social Forces 92 (3):1009-37.
  6. Bruns, A., and Burgess, J.E. 2011. The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Paper presented at the 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, August 25-27, Univeristy of Iceland, Reykjavik.
  7. Campbell, Heidi A. 2013. ‘Introduction: The Rise of the Study of Digital Religion’. In: Heidi A. Campbell (Ed.), Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. London: Routledge, 1-21.
  8. Chen, G. M. 2011. Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 755–762.
  9. Dawson, Lorne L. & Cowan, Douglas E. (Eds.) 2004. Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York: Routledge.
  10. de Zaniga, H. G., Bachmann, I., Hsu, S.-H., & Brundidge, J. 2013. Expressive versus consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538–1559.
  11. Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Str.mb.ck, J., & Nord, L. W. 2014. The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 45, 95–118.
  12. Epley, Jennifer L. 2010. Voices of The Faithful: Religion and Politics in Contemporary Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
  13. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/77766
  14. Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
  15. Fealy, G. and White, S. 2008. Introduction. In G. Fealy and S. White (eds.), Expressing Islam: religious life and politics in Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, pp. 1–13.
  16. Fish, M. Steven. 2011. Are Muslims Distinctive? A Look at the Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. 2014. Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612–634.
  18. Hadaway, C. Kirk, Penny Long Marler, and Mark Chaves. 1993. "What the Polls Don't Show: A Closer Look at U.S. Church Attendance." American Sociological Review 58 (6):741-52.
  19. Hammond, J.L. 1979 The Politics of Benevolence: Revival Religion and American Voting Behaviour. Noorwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  20. Hanafi, Muchlis M. 2011. Al-Qurán dan Kenegaraan: Tafsir al-Qurán Tematik. Jakarta: Lajnah Pentashihan al-Qurán.
  21. Hanna, A., Wells, C., Maurer, P., Friedland, L., Shah, D. and
  22. Matthes, J. 2013. Partisan alignments and political polarization online: a computational approach to understanding the French and US presidential election. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Politics, Elections and Data (pp. 15-22), ACM.
  23. Hassan, Riaz. 2005. On Being Religious: Patterns of Religious Commitment in Muslim Societies (Working Paper No. 80) Retrieved from Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies Singapore.
  24. Hill, D. and Sen K. 2005. The internet in Indonesia’s new democracy. London: Routledge.
  25. Husein, Fatimah, and Martin Slama. 2018. Online piety and its discontent: revisiting Islamic anxieties on Indonesian social media, Indonesia and the Malay World, 46:134, pp. 80-93.
  26. Jenkins, H. 2012. Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.
  27. Jones, Carla and Martin Slama. 2017 "Introduction: Piety, Celebrity, Sociality." In "Piety, Celebrity, Sociality: A Forum on Islam and Social Media in Southeast Asia," Martin Slama and Carla Jones, eds., American Ethnologist website, November 8.
  28. http://americanethnologist.org/features/collections/piety-celebrity-sociality/introduction
  29. Kirschenbaum, M.G. 2010. “What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in English departments?”, ADE Bulletin, Vol. 150 No. 7, pp. 55-61.
  30. Lazer, D., Pentland, A.(S.), Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A.L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D. and Van Alstyne,M. 2009. “Life in the network: the coming age of computational social science”, Science, 323(5915), pp. 721-723.
  31. Lee, J.L., DeCamp, M., Dredze, M,. Chisolm M.S., Berger, Z.D. 2014. What are health-related users tweeting? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Health-Related Users and Their Messages on Twitter. Journal Of Medical Internet Research. 16(10):1438-8871Thomas, R., David. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation. 27 (2): 237-242.
  32. Lim, M. 2006. Lost in transition? The internet and Reformasi in Indonesia. In J. Dean, J. Anderson and G. Lovink (eds.), Reformatting politics: networked communications and global civil society. London: Routledge, pp. 85–106.
  33. Livingstone, S. 2002. The changing social landscape. In Lievrouw, L., and Livingstone, S. (Eds.), Handbook of New Media: Social shaping and Social Consequences. London: Sage.
  34. Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2016. Measuring Piety in Indonesia. Paper presented at AALIMS Conference on the Political Economy of Islam and Muslim Societies, April 16.
  35. Pepinsky, Thomas B, Liddle, R William, and Saiful Mujani. 2018. Piety and Public Opinion: Understanding Indonesian Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.
  36. Pew Research Center. 2015. Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project. 2015 Spring Survey Topline Results. June 23, 2015 Release. Retrieved from http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/06/23/spring-2015-survey/ (Accessed Nov 18, 2018)
  37. Pramiyanti, A. & Emma, B. 2017. Hijabers of Instagram: the Muslim women challenging stereotype. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/hijabers-of-instagram-the-muslim-women-challenging-stereotypes-79416#comment_1340260
  38. Presser, Stanley, and Linda Stinson. 1998. "Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Self-Reported Religious Attendance." American Sociological Review 63 (1):137-45.
  39. Rashi, Tsuriel & McCombs, Maxwell. 2015. ‘Agenda Setting, Religion and New Media: The Chabad Case Study’. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 4(1), 126-145.
  40. Rogers, R. 2013. Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  41. Rojas, H., & Puig-i-Abril, E. 2009. Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the Digital Age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 902–927.
  42. Satria, Alif. 2017. Distinguishing piety and fundamentalism in Indonesian Muslims. Retrieved from http://www.newmandala.org/distinguishing-piety-fundamentalism-indonesian-muslims/
  43. Slama, M. 2017. Social media and Islamic practice: Indonesian ways of being digitally pious. In E. Jurriens and R. Tapsell (eds), Digital Indonesia: connectivity and divergence. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, pp. 146–162.
  44. Slama, Martin. 2018. Practising Islam through social media in Indonesia, Indonesia and the Malay World, 46:134, 1-4.
  45. Stromer‐Galley, J. and Wichowski, A. 2011. Political Discussion Online. In The Handbook of Internet Studies (eds M. Consalvo and C. Ess). pp 168- 187. doi:10.1002/9781444314861.ch8
  46. Turmudi, E. 1995. Religion and Politics: A Study on Political Attitudes of Devout Muslims and the Role of the "Kyai" in Contemporary Java, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 23 (2), pp. 18-41
  47. Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barbera, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A. 2015. Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower- and higher-threshold political activities among Twitter users in Italy. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 20, 221–239.
  48. Velasquez, A., and Rojas, H. 2017. Political Expression on Social Media: The Role of Communication Competence and Expected Outcomes. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117696521
  49. Weinstein, C. Emily. 2014. The Personal Is Political on Social Media: Online Civic Expression Patterns and Pathways Among Civically Engaged Youth. International Journal of Communication, 8 (24), pp 210–233.


  • There are currently no refbacks.