Reposisi Kewenangan Judicial Review: Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan ke dalam Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Harmonisasi Hukum Nasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/t14e6130Keywords:
Judicial Review, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Mahkamah Agung, Reposisi Kewenangan, Supremasi KonstitusiAbstract
Dualisme kewenangan judicial review antara Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dan Mahkamah Agung (MA) telah menimbulkan ketidakefektifan dan konflik kelembagaan dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Kondisi ini berdampak pada fragmentasi norma dan inkonsistensi penegakan konstitusi yang mengancam prinsip constitutional supremacy. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis problematika dualisme kewenangan judicial review dalam praktik ketatanegaraan Indonesia dan menawarkan model reposisi kewenangan di bawah satu lembaga, yakni Mahkamah Konstitusi. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan perbandingan hukum (comparative legal approach), penelitian ini menelaah argumentasi teoritik, normatif, dan praktik di beberapa negara dengan model centralized constitutional review. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa reposisi kewenanganjudicial review kepada MK akan memperkuat fungsi pengawasan konstitusional, meningkatkan transparansi, dan menjamin perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara secara lebih konsisten. Reformulasi kewenangan ini menjadi langkah strategis menuju integrasi sistem hukum nasional yang lebih harmonis dan responsif terhadap prinsip negara hukum (rule of law).
References
Alec Stone Sweet. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2000.
Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri, Muchamad Ali Safa’at, and Riana Susmayanti. “Human Rights and Democracy: Can the President’s Constitutional Disobedience Be Used as Grounds for Impeachment?” Human Rights in the Global South (HRGS) 3, no. 1 (2024): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.56784/hrgs.v3i1.80.
Aung, Nge Nge. “The Basis of Constitutional Adjudication in Germany.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 1 (2022): 47–64. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no1.2419.
Bovens, Mark, Robert E. Goodin, Thomas Schillemans, and Carol Harlow. “Accountability and Constitutional Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin, and Thomas Schillemans. Oxford University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0005.
Chalid, Hamid A. “Dualism Of Judicial Review In Indonesia: Problems And Solutions.” Indonesia Law Review 7, no. 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v7n3.353.
Chalid, Hamid, and Arief Ainul Yaqin. “Menggagas Pelembagaan Constitutional Question Melalui Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menguji Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 2 (2019): 363. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1628.
Didin, Syafik. “Urgensi Penyatuan Kewenangan Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Oleh Lembaga Peradilan (Judicial Review) Di Indonesia.” Rechtidee 11, no. 2 (2017): 208–25. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v11i2.2159.
Donald Kommers and Russell Miller. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Duke University Press, 2012.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Legal Problems Of Dualism Of Judicial Review System In Indonesia.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 16, no. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.2.535.
Finck, Danielle E. “Judicial Review: The United States Supreme Court Versus the German Constitutional Court.” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 20, no. 1 (1997): 123.
Gunter Frankenberg. Comparative Constitutional Law in a Global Age: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.
Gustama, Briliant, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, and Sarita Sarita. “The Influence of TAP MPR’s Position on The Hierarchy System of Indonesian Laws and Regulations.” Indonesia Law Reform Journal 2, no. 1 (2022): 67–80. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.19442.
Hakki, Diyaul. “Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia against Pancasila.” Journal of Law and Regulation Governance 1, no. 2 (2023): 60–67. https://doi.org/10.57185/jlarg.v1i2.13.
Hans Kelsen. General Theory of Law and State. Harvard University Press, 1949.
Hasebe, Yasuo. “Making We the People: Democratic Constitutional Founding in Postwar Japan and South Korea.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 11, no. 2 (2016): 329–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2016.19.
Hasibuan, M. Fadly, and Iza Rumesten. “Reorientasi Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Berdasarkan Prinsip Supremasi Konstitusi.” Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan 22, no. 2 (2023): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v22i2.2713.
Hidayat, Nanang Al, and Mela Sari. “Dualisme Judicial Review Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 7, no. 3 (2018): 318. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i03.p04.
Jeon, Sang-Hyeon. “A Critical Review on Composition of the Constitutional Court of Korea.” Constitutional Review 10, no. 1 (2024): 1. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1011.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. “Gagasan Amandemen Kelima UUD NRI Tahun 1945: Penguatan Sistem Hukum Dan MK.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 1 (2023): 1–19.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Konstitusi Press, 2006.
Lailam, Tanto, and M. Lutfi Chakim. “A Proposal To Adopt Concrete Judicial Review In Indonesian Constitutional Court: A Study On The German Federal Constitutional Court Experiences.” PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 10, no. 2 (2023): 148–71. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a1.
Lee, Youngjae. “The Role of the Judiciary in the Presidential Impeachment Process in Korea.” SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5043443.
Mursyidi, Mursyidi. “Kekuatan Dan Batas Judicial Review Dalam Arsitektur Hukum Indonesia.” Syura: Journal of Law 3, no. 1 (2025): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.58223/syura.v3i1.387.
Sabendi Putri, Chatrine, and Muhammad Rafi Darajati. “Comparative Study Of The Constitutional Court As A Guardian Of The Constitution Between Indonesia And Germany.” PRANATA HUKUM 17, no. 2 (2022): 94–113. https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v17i2.289.
Satya Arinanto. Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Demokrasi Konstitusional Di Indonesia. Rajawali Press, 2021.
Siahaan, Maruarar. “Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 4 (2021): 729–52. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742.
Siregar, El Renova Ed, and Adya Paramita Prabandari. “Dinamika Hubungan Antara Mahkamah Agung Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perspektif Konflik Dan Kolaborasi.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 7, no. 2 (2024): 729–39. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.8833.
Siregar, Fritz Edwadr. “Indonesia Constitutional Court Constitutional Interpretation Methodology (2003-2008).” Constitutional Review 1, no. 1 (2016): 1. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev111.
Slamet Kurnia, Titon. “Mahkamah Agung Dan Supremasi Konstitusi: Diskresi Yudisial Dalam Penerapan Undang-Undang.” Mimbar Hukum 34, no. 1 (2022): 90–124. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v34i1.2084.
Sudirman, Sudirman. “Memurnikan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Lembaga Pengawal Konstitusi (The Guardian Of The Constitution).” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 1, no. 1 (2016): 48–55. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v1i12016p048.
Sunardi, Dian. “Kontradiksi Putusan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Agung Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, no. Vol 16, No 2 (2022): ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan (2022): 159–76.
Vašek, Markus. “Constitutional Jurisdiction and Protection of Fundamental Rights in Europe.” In The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law, 1st ed., edited by Armin Von Bogdandy, Huber Peter M., and Christoph Grabenwarter. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846693.003.0008.
Winda Indah Wardani and Laga Sugiarto. “Perbandingan Desain Isu Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia Dan Thailand.” JAPHTN-HAN 2, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.55.
Yesi Imelda and Sandy Wijaya. “Analisis Kewenangan Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Amandemen Ketiga Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Dalam Perspektif Siyasah.” Medina-Te 17, no. 1 (2021): 52–72.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sayyidatun Nashuha Basyar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication, i.e. this journal.
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details, and publisher are identified
All publications by Staatsrecht: Jurnal Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.png)
