Evaluasi Pembelajaran Daring Pascapandemi: Menuju Model Hybrid Learning di Perguruan Tinggi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2025.127-132Keywords:
Higher Education Policy, Hybrid Learning, Learning Evaluation, Technology AcceptanceAbstract
The digital transformation of higher education has accelerated significantly since the COVID-19 pandemic and continues to evolve in the post-pandemic era. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of online learning and to formulate strategic policy directions toward sustainable hybrid learning models. Employing a quantitative descriptive approach, this research utilizes primary data collected from 160 respondents, consisting of students and lecturers at the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. The findings indicate that synchronous learning platforms such as Zoom and Google Meet are perceived as effective in supporting online learning; however, challenges remain in terms of interaction quality, student engagement, and the achievement of learning outcomes. Advanced statistical analysis reveals that perceived usefulness, quality of teaching materials, ease of use, and learning interaction significantly influence student satisfaction and learning outcomes, with learning interest acting as a mediating variable. Grounded in the integration of TPACK, TAM, and UTAUT frameworks, this study highlights that successful digital learning transformation requires not only technological adoption but also pedagogical innovation and institutional support. The study concludes that hybrid learning represents a strategic direction for higher education institutions to enhance learning quality and sustainability in the digital era.
References
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Graham, C. R. (2023). Current research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 173–188). Routledge.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
OECD. (2024). Digital education outlook 2024: Towards smart and inclusive learning systems. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/xxxxxx
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Naidu, S. (2023). Mapping research trends in open, distance, and digital education: A systematic review. Distance Education, 44(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.xxxxxx
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi.
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2020). Suddenly online: A national survey of undergraduates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital Promise.









