Peningkatan Keterampilan Berbicara Menggunakan Metode Role Playing pada Siswa Kelas III-B MIN 8 Gunungkidul

Authors

  • Rujati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2019.41-05

Keywords:

Speaking Skills, Role Playing Method, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve the quality of the process and results of speaking skills by using the role-playing method for third-grade students. MIN 8 Gunungkidul 2018/2019 Academic Year. This research is in the form of Classroom Action Research (CAR). The subject of this study was class III. B MIN 8 Gunungkidul 2018/2019 Academic Year amounted to 21 students. Data collection techniques used were observation, interviews, tests, and document studies - data validity using source triangulation and method triangulation. The data analysis technique used is an interactive analysis model, including data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions or verification. The research process was carried out in two cycles. Each cycle consists of four stages, namely: (1) action planning, (2) implementation of actions, (3) observation, and (4) reflection. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the role-playing method could improve the quality of the process and the results of speaking skills in class III students. B MIN 8 Gunungkidul Academic Year 2018/2019. This can be proven by the increasing percentage of students' attitudes to aspects of interest, activity, cooperation, and seriousness in the first cycle and second cycle. In the first cycle, the classic percentage of students' attitudes is 77.77% interest, 66.66% student activity, 72.22% cooperation, and 50% seriousness. In the second cycle, the classic percentage of a student, attitudes increased to interest 88.88%, student activity 77.77%, cooperation 83.33%, and sincerity 77.77%. The quality of the results is proven by obtaining the average value of the initial test results before the action (pra siklus), which is 68.77 with classical completeness of 27.77%. In the first cycle, the grade average value increased to 73.44 with 61.11% classical completeness. After the action in the second cycle, the average grade value increased to 80.77 with classical completeness 88.88%.

Downloads

References

Arsyad, Maidar G., dan Mukti U.S. 1991. Pembinaan Kemampuan Berbicara Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2007. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar Model Silabus Kelas V. Jakarta: Diknas.
Hamalik, Oemar, 2003. Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sistem. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Iskandar. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Gaung Persada.
Iskandarwassid dan Dadang Sunendar 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Joyce, Bruce, Weil, Marsha dan Emily Calchoun. 2009. Models of Teaching (Model-Model Pengajaran). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas. 2007. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Sabarti Akhadiah MK, dkk. 1991/1992. Bahasa Indonesia I. Jakarta: Proyek Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Santosa, Puji, dkk. 2008. Materi Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Sumantri, Mulyani dan Johan Permana. 2001. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: CV Maulana.
Tarigan, Djago, 1992. Materi Pokok Pendidikan bahasa Indonesia 1. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur, 2008. Berbicara Sebagai Salah Satu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Wahab, Abdul Azis, 2009. Metode dan Moel-model Mengajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Yamin, Martinis, 2005. Strategi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi. Ciputat : Gaung Persada Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-19