Boosting Engineering Capabilities through Science Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jtcre.2024.62-06Keywords:
engineering capabilities, learning, scienceAbstract
This research aims to review increasing engineering capabilities through science learning using the case study method. The primary focus of the research is to understand how the integration of science concepts in the engineering curriculum can improve students' technical and analytical skills. The case study was conducted at a vocational high school that applies an interdisciplinary approach between science and engineering. Data was collected through classroom observations, interviews, and questionnaires. The research results show that students who are involved in science learning integrated with engineering can demonstrate an understanding of engineering concepts, problem-solving abilities, and critical thinking skills. In addition, teaching methods that focus on scientific projects and experiments have proven effective in building students' interest and motivation towards the field of engineering. This research concludes that science learning applied in an integrative manner can be an effective strategy in improving students' engineering capabilities
Downloads
References
Admawati, H., Jumadi, J., & Nursyahidah, F. (2018). The effect of STEM project-based learning on students' scientific attitude based on social constructivism theory. In Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2018) (pp. 270-273). Atlantis Press.
Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. 2016. “Practicing Engineering While Building with Blocks: Identifying Engineering Thinking.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 24(1):67–85
Barroso, L. R., Nite, S. B., Morgan, J. R., Bicer, A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2016). Using the engineering design process as the structure for project-based learning: An informal STEM activity on bridge-building. In 2016 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (pp. 249-256). IEEE
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Cooley, A. (2013). Qualitative research in education: The origins, debates, and politics of creating knowledge. Educational Studies, 49(3), 247-262
Corbett, K. S. (2012). The engineering design process as a model for STEM curriculum design. Louisiana Tech University
Creswell, John W. and Plano Clark, Vicki L. 2018. Designing and Conduting: Mixed Methods Research. Third Edition. California: SAGE Publication
Daugherty, J. L. (2010). Engineering professional development design for secondary school teachers: A multiple case study. Journal of Technology Education, 21(1), 10.
Delamont, S. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of qualitative research in education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Douglas, J., Iversen, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 Classroom. An Analysis of Current Practices & Guidelines for the Future, 1-22.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 103-120.
Feder, M., Pearson, G., & Katehi, L. (Eds.). (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. National Academies Press.
Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for?. American political science review, 98(2), 341-354.
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. 2016. “STEM Integration in Middle School Life Science: Student Learning and Attitudes.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25(4):550–60
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. 2014. “How Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics (Stem) Project-Based Learning (Pbl) Affects High, Middle, And Low Achievers Differently: The Impact Of Student Factors On Achievement.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Hancock, D. R., Algozzine, B., & Lim, J. H. (2021). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers.
Hays, P. A. (2003). Case study research. In Foundations for research (pp. 233-250). Routledge.
Heryani, T. P., Suwarma, I. R., & Chandra, D. T. (2023). Development of STEM-based physics module with self-regulated learning to train students critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4245-4252.
Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D., & Carberry, A. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses.
Johannes Sæleset & Patricia Friedrichsen (2022) A Case Study of Specialized Science Courses in Teacher Education and Their Impact on Classroom Teaching, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33:6, 641-663, DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2021.1971859
Karpudewan, M. (2022). Minding the gap between theory and practice to reinforce the delivery of STEM education. In Education in Malaysia (pp. 62-77). Routledge.
Kim, M., McFeetors, P. J., Jin, Q., Rose, K., Carey, J., Miller-Young, J., ... & Adeeb, S. (2023). " We Learn Things to Solve Real-Life Problems": Understanding How Nature of Engineering Beliefs Situate Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge in a Modular Engineering Education Professional Development Program. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(3), 7.
King, D., & English, L. D. 2016. “Engineering Design in the Primary School: Applying Stem Concepts to Build an Optical Instrument.” International Journal of Science Education 38(18):2762–94
Laboy-Rush, D. 2010. Integrated STEM Education through Project-Based Learning
Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. 2016. “Impact of an Engineering Design-Based Curriculum Compared to an Inquiry-Based Curriculum on Fifth Graders‟ Content Learning of Simple Machines.” Research in Science & Technological Education 34(1):85–104
Penner, D. E. (2000). Chapter 1: cognition, computers, and synthetic science: building knowledge and meaning through modeling. Review of research in education, 25(1), 1-35.
Rusmana, A. N., Widodo, A., & Surakusumah, W. (2021). Promoting the middle school students’ engineering skills and conceptual understanding through STEM-based learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1957, No. 1, p. 012020). IOP Publishing.
Schnittka, C. G., Evans, M. A., Won, S. G. L., & Drape, T. A. 2016. “After-School Spaces: Looking for Learning in All the Right Places.” Research in Science Education 46(3):389–412
Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Esteban-Escaño, J., García, F., & Fidalgo-Blanco, A. (2017). The learning improvement of engineering students using peer-created complementary resources (No. ART-2017-99838)
Sjoberg, G., Orum, A. M., & Feagin, J. R. (2020). A case for the case study. The University of North Carolina Press.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. sage.
Suripto, S., Fabirah, N. R., Nanna, A. W. I., & Bua, M. T. (2023). Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics (Stem) In Exploring Students’critical Thinking Skills. Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 319-331.
VanWynsberghe, R., & Khan, S. (2007). Redefining case study. International journal of qualitative methods, 6(2), 80-94.
Wang, J., & Agogino, A. M. (2014). Learning About Learning and Engineering: Engineers, Students, and Educators Co-Design Challenges for a Science Center. In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 24-849)..
Wendell, B. K., & Rogers, C. (2013). “Engineering Design-Based Science, Science Content Performance, and Science Attitudes in Elementary School.” Journal of Engineering Education 102(4):513–40
Yanyan, L., Zhinan, H., Menglu, J., & Wen, C. T. (2016). “He Effect on Pupil‟s Science Performance and Problem-Solving Ability through Lego: An Engineering DesignBased Modeling Approach.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19(3):143–56
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Yin, R. K., Clarke, C., Cotner, B., & Lee, R. (2012). Case study methods. In Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 111-122). Routledge
