Evaluation of Introductory Environmental Chemistry Course for Prospective Chemistry Teachers Using Context, Input and Process Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jtcre.2024.62-05Keywords:
Context, Input and Process Evaluation, CIPP Model, Learning Methods, Environmental Chemistry Course ProgrammeAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the learning programme of the Introduction to Environmental Chemistry course of the Chemistry Education study programme in one of the public universities in Bandung City. This study needs to be evaluated and improved because there are still aspects that are not in accordance with 21st century learning as evidenced by document analysis and learning observations. The method used is a qualitative approach and the CIPP (Context, input, process, Product) evaluation model as a tool to evaluate and improve the lecture programme which focuses on the Context aspect in the form of document analysis of the Semester Learning Plan (SLP), the Input aspect in the form of lecturer interviews and the Process aspect in the form of learning observations. The results obtained from the analysis show that there are several findings that need to be evaluated due to the incompatibility of aspects in the SLP document update such as administrative completeness, the General Skills Aspect (GSA) 1 listed is not in accordance with the Context of Learning Outcomes (CLOs), based on interviews with teaching lecturers it is stated that problem-based learning (PBL) with the context of validated environmental issues in relevant theoretical content and in the aspect of the learning observation process it was found that there were aspects of learning practices that were not in accordance with the SLP document reference. The evaluation also highlighted the importance of updating and adjusting learning media to be more interactive and relevant to the context of environmental issues. The assessment of the last three years shows the potential to further develop programmes can to improve students' higher order thinking skills
Downloads
References
Al Idrus, S. W., Purwoko, A. A., Hadisaputra, S., & Junaidi, E. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Praktikum Kimia Lingkungan Berbasis Green Chemistry Pada Mata Kuliah Kimia Lngkungan. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(5), 541-547.
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological conservation, 241, 1-13.
Asadollah, S. B. H. S., Sharafati, A., Motta, D., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2021). River water quality index prediction and uncertainty analysis: A comparative study of machine learning models. Journal of environmental chemical engineering, 9(1), 104599.
Bodur, N. C., Tuysuz, C., & Ugulu, I. (2022). Qualitative Evaluation of the Science Curriculum Applied in Science and Art Centers (SACs) for Gifted Students in Turkey Within the Framework of the CIPP Approach. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 604-635.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
Dizon, A. G. (2023). Historical development of CIPP as a curriculum evaluation model. History of Education, 52(1), 109-128.
Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2019). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 14(1), 7.
Moallem, M. (2019). Effects of PBL on learning outcomes, knowledge acquisition, and higher‐order thinking skills. The Wiley handbook of problem‐based Learning, 107-133.
Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 1-9
Naeem, S., Ali, Z., & Ahmed, N. (2022). Evaluation of the Causes of Interest Decline in the Subject of Chemistry amongst Secondary and Higher Secondary School Students in Karachi Pakistan. International Journal of Social Science & Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 175-184.
Ngala, J. S., Fongod, G. M., Orock, T. J., Ayuk, B. M., & Njenwi, E. A. (2019). Evaluating distance education programme using Stufflebeam CIPP model: University of Buea Cameroon. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 9(10-I), 1-15.
Ningsih, B., & Suryani, E. (2021). The effectiveness of the buzz group discussion methods on improving the collaboration of basic school students. International Journal of Global Accounting, Management, Education, and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 1-6.
Nukhbatillah, I. A., Setiawati, S., Hasanah, U., & Nurmalasari, N. (2024). Evaluasi Mutu Pendidikan Menggunakan Pendekatan Teori Stufflebeam. Jurnal Global Futuristik, 2(1), 34-43.
Purwanto, A., Rahmawati, Y., Rahmayanti, N., Mardiah, A., & Putri, R. A. (2022). Socio-critical and problem-oriented approach in environmental issues for students' critical thinking skills development in Chemistry learning. JOTSE, 12(1), 50-67.
Reinsini, C. E., Susila, I. W., & Cholik, M. (2021). Application of problem-based learning to enhance students learning outcomes in basic competencies of maintaining brake systems. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 3(2), 139-145.
Ritonga, R., Saepudin, A., & Wahyudin, U. (2019). Penerapan model evaluasi kirkpatrick empat level dalam mengevaluasi program Diklat di Balai Besar Pelatihan Pertanian (BBPP) Lembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Nonformal, 14(1), 12-21.
Sakti, R. R. A., Afiah, N. N., & Mulyani, S. M. (2023). The Influence of Internal Control and E-Budgeting on the Performance of Local Government Agencies Through the Implementation of Good Governance. JASa (Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi), 7(3), 406-420.
Schultz, J., Powell, R., & Ross, K. D. (2022). Tutorial: Data collection and documentation strategies for speech-language pathologist/speech-language pathology assistant teams. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(4), 1022-1036.
Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The cipp model: Applications in language program evaluation. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), 1360.
Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2019). Implementation of game-transformed inquiry-based learning to promote the understanding of and motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 152-164.
Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98.
Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 36.
Yulis, P. A. R., & Oktariani, O. (2024). Need Analysis for Development (E-Module) of Analytical Chemistry Integrated with Environmental Analysis Research Results. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 12(1), 160-173.
Zhu, W., Ma, C., Zhao, X., Wang, M., Heidari, A. A., Chen, H., & Li, C. (2020). Evaluation of sino foreign cooperative education project using orthogonal sine cosine optimized kernel extreme learning machine. IEEE access, 8, 61107-61123.
Zuin, V. G., Eilks, I., Elschami, M., & Kümmerer, K. (2021). Education in green chemistry and in sustainable chemistry: perspectives towards sustainability. Green Chemistry, 23(4), 1594-1608.
