Implementing Independent Learning Curricula: A Case Study from MAN 2 Kediri, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/manageria.2023.82-03Keywords:
Educational innovation, curriculum evaluation, independent learning curricula, student autonomyAbstract
This research examines four aspects of the independent learning curriculum at MAN 2 Kediri City, namely objectives, materials, methods and evaluation. The main focus is to examine the impact on the development of students' independence and their readiness to face future challenges. This qualitative case study involves field observations, interviews with educational figures, and document analysis within an ethnographic framework. The research results show that the curriculum is designed to shape student character according to the national education profile, with broad and inclusive content. This approach focuses on developing critical thinking and problem solving abilities through a variety of teaching methods. The evaluation uses a multilevel assessment strategy to ensure the effectiveness of the curriculum. The implementation was successful, marked by student academic achievement. However, there are limitations to this research, namely the absence of visual data analysis. For this reason, further studies are needed. These findings contribute to curriculum theory, by proposing a framework that prepares students with essential skills and attitudes for the 21st century.
Downloads
References
Abdelmalak, M. (2015). Participatory curriculum planning: Students’ perceptions. Curriculum and Teaching, 30(1), 67–84. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/30.1.06
Al-Eraky, M. M. (2012). Curriculum Navigator: Aspiring towards a comprehensive package for curriculum planning. Medical Teacher, 34(9), 724–732. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.689445
Bullock, M. I. (1988). The Development of Approaches to Curriculum Planning to Meet Academic and Professional Objectives. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 34(4), 203–208. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60610-3
Carpenter, B. (1987). Curriculum planning for children with profound and multiple learning difficulties. Early Child Development and Care, 28(2), 149–162. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443870280205
Chavasse, J. (1988). A tailor-made course: Curriculum planning in miniature. Nurse Education Today, 8(4), 222–228. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-6917(88)90152-9
Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C.-S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568
Desai, M. (2000). Curriculum planning for history of philosophies of social work. Indian Journal of Social Work, 61(2), 234–236. Scopus.
Goddard, A. (1995). From product to process in curriculum planning: A view from Britain. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(5), 258–263. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949502800501
Harper, B. J., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Tightening curricular connections: CQI and effective curriculum planning. Research in Higher Education, 51(6), 505–527. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9167-2
John W. Creswell. (2014). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
Kähkönen, E., & Hölttä-Otto, K. (2022). From crossing chromosomes to crossing curricula–a biomimetic analogy for cross-disciplinary engineering curriculum planning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(3), 516–534. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1953446
Kelly, N., Wright, N., Dawes, L., Kerr, J., & Robertson, A. (2019). Co-design for curriculum planning: A model for professional development for high school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(7), 84–107. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44n7.6
Koren, M. E., Hertz, J., Munroe, D., Rossetti, J., Robertson, J., Plonczynski, D., Berent, G., & Ehrlich-Jones, L. (2008). Assessing students’ learning needs and attitudes: Considerations for gerontology curriculum planning. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 28(4), 39–56. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960801963029
Lazar, A. L., Gensley, J., & Gowan, J. (1972). Developing positive attitudes through curriculum planning for young gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 16(1), 27–31. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627201600113
Lexy J. Moleong. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
McGill, M. M. (2012). The curriculum planning process for undergraduate game degree programs in the United Kingdom and United States. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 12(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1145/2160547.2160550
Monk, A. (1978). Gerontological education: Propositions for curriculum planning in higher education. Educational Gerontology, 3(3), 265–275. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127780030308
Newell, A. D., Foldes, C. A., Haddock, A. J., Ismail, N., & Moreno, N. P. (2023). Twelve tips for using the Understanding by Design® curriculum planning framework. Medical Teacher. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2224498
Pollitt, R., Cohrssen, C., & Seah, W. T. (2020). Assessing spatial reasoning during play: Educator observations, assessment and curriculum planning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(2), 331–363. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00337-8
Pomphrey, C. (2004). Professional development through collaborative curriculum planning in English and modern languages. Language Learning Journal, 29(1), 12–17. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730485200041
Rahayu, R. I., Mohammad Huda, A. Y., Sonhadji, A. K. H., & Utaya, S. (2019). Life skills curriculum planning on Higher Education based on Islamic boarding schools. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(4), 493–512. Scopus.
Ritonga, M., Purnamasari, S., Budiarti, M., Lahmi, A., Nurdianto, T., & Zulfida, S. (2021). The management of arabic language and the yellow book curriculum planning at islamic boarding schools in respond to the freedom to learn education system. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24(Special Issue 1), 1–10. Scopus.
Smith, K., Hurst, B., & Linden-Perlis, D. (2023). Using professional development resources to support the inclusion of gender equity in early childhood teaching and curriculum planning. Gender and Education, 35(3), 199–214. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2022.2142530
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Toepfer, C. F. (1971). Actualizing Concept Learning: The Challenge to Curriculum Planning. Theory Into Practice, 10(2), 134–137. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847109542316
Tsuda, B., Urano, T., Yamato, I., Masuda, R., Seki, T., Nakagawa, Y., Izumi, S., & Hamada, M. (2021). Introducing a remote pre-graduate medical education curriculum planning workshop during the covid-19 pandemic. Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 46(2), 54–58. Scopus.
Wallace, H. D., Preston, L., & Harvie, K. M. (2016). Assessing curriculum planning for humanities inquiry: The challenges and opportunities of poster presentation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(12), 67–82. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n12.5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nur Kholifah Akrom, Abd. Aziz, Agus Zaenul Fitri, Venant Hakizimana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal and also allows to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially with contributions under the same license as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.