Novelty skripsi mahasiswa (tren dan rekomendasi topik penelitian mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Matematika)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tren dan kebaruan (novelty) penelitian skripsi mahasiswa pada Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif dengan metode analisis bibliometrik terhadap 194 judul skripsi dalam kurun waktu lima tahun terakhir. Data dikumpulkan melalui dokumentasi dan dianalisis menggunakan perangkat lunak VOSviewer untuk mengidentifikasi pola, kecenderungan, serta keterkaitan antar topik penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penelitian mahasiswa didominasi oleh pendekatan kuantitatif, khususnya kuasi-eksperimen, dengan fokus utama pada model pembelajaran seperti Problem Based Learning dan variabel seperti pemahaman konsep serta pemecahan masalah. Penelitian kualitatif dan pengembangan telah dilakukan, namun masih terbatas pada pendekatan deskriptif dan produk konvensional seperti LKPD. Selain itu, ditemukan adanya kecenderungan repetisi topik dan keterbatasan eksplorasi metodologi serta variabel penelitian.Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya diversifikasi metodologi, eksplorasi variabel kognitif dan afektif yang lebih kompleks, serta integrasi teknologi dalam penelitian pendidikan matematika. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi dasar dalam pengembangan kebijakan akademik dan peningkatan kualitas penelitian mahasiswa.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Ahmad, I., Borman, R. I., Fakhrurozi, J., & Caksana, G. G. (2020). Software development dengan extreme programming (XP) pada aplikasi deteksi kemiripan judul skripsi berbasis Android. INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Informatika, 5(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.35314/isi.v5i2.1654
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2017). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Some answered and unanswered questions. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.11.001
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Djuwari, D. (2021). Synthesis and novelty for developing the framework in academic writing. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i2.329
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to scientometrics: Visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.009
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Freudenthal Institute.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Maryatun, M., & Handayani, W. (2022). Analisis bibliometrik penelitian tugas akhir mahasiswa di Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Gadjah Mada. Media Pustakawan, 29(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.37014/medpus.v29i1.2754
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Patriotta, G. (2017). Crafting papers for publication: Novelty and convention in academic writing. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12280
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wiyarsih, W. (2021). Analisis trends topik penelitian mahasiswa Fakultas MIPA UGM periode 2016–2018. UNILIB: Jurnal Perpustakaan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/unilib.vol12.iss1.art1
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629