Peningkatan hasil belajar matematika siswa dengan strategi “pasangan belajar bersama”
Main Article Content
Abstract
Student proficiency in mathematics, as reflected in learning outcomes, remains a challenge that requires solutions. This study aimed to improve students' mathematics learning outcomes through the application of the "Collaborative Learning Pairs" strategy. The research method employed was Classroom Action Research (CAR), which included cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection to evaluate the effectiveness of the applied strategy. The "Collaborative Learning Pairs" strategy was an adaptation of the cooperative learning model Think-Pair-Share, which formed learning pairs based on students' abilities, proximity of their homes, gender, and familiarity with each other. The data for this study were students' learning outcomes on flat and solid geometry topics. The research subjects were 28 seventh-grade students from SMP Negeri 4 Geyer Grobogan during the even semester of the 2022/2023 academic year. Data were collected through tests and observations. The data analysis included descriptive statistics, followed by a comparison with the research success criteria. The findings indicated that the strategy involved stages of student pairing, planning classroom and home activities, implementation, and evaluation. The data analysis results showed that before the strategy implementation (Pre-Cycle), the average mathematics score was 70.5, with only 28.57% of students achieving mastery with a Minimum Passing Criteria (KKM) of 80. In Cycle 1, after applying the strategy, the average score increased to 82.39, with 64.28% of students achieving mastery. In Cycle 2, the average score further increased to 85.32, with 78.57% of students achieving mastery. The results demonstrated that the "Collaborative Learning Pairs" strategy effectively improved students' mathematics learning outcomes. The significant increase in both average scores and the percentage of students achieving mastery from the Pre-Cycle to Cycle 2 indicated that this strategy was a viable solution for addressing the challenges in students' mathematics proficiency
Downloads
Article Details
References
Abiodun, T.O. et al. (2022). Effect of Think-Pair-Share Strategy on Student Achievement in Senior Secondary School Mathematics. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), 20-25.
Altermatt, E. (2019). Academic Support From Peers as a Predictor of Academic Self-Efficacy Among College Students. Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory and Practice 21(1):21-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1521025116686588
Arends, R. I. (2013). Belajar Untuk Mengajar, Learning to Teach. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2022). Panduan Pengembangan Kurikulum Operasional di Satuan Pendidikan. Kemdikbudristek.
Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2022). Laporan Kinerja Pusat Standar dan Kebijakan Pendidikan 2022. Kemdikbudristek.
Bellini, S., Peters, J. K., Benner, L., & Hopf, A. (2007). A meta-analysis of school-based social skils interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28(3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280030401
Berki, E. (2016). Critical and Creative Mathematical Thinking with Practical Problem-Solving Skills: A New Old Challenge. University of Tampere.
Berndt, T. J. (1982). The Features and Effects of Friendship in Early Adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1447–1460. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/1130071
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students’ Potential through Creative Math, Inspiring Messages, and Innovative Teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Brown, B.B. (2004). Adolescents' Relationships with Peers. In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (pp. 363-394). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471726746.ch12
Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, S. (2016). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Peer relationships and the development of psychopathology. In M. Lewis & K. D. Rudolph (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 185–204). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9608-3_10
Damayanti, F. (2023). The problem of education in Indonesia: is the independent curriculum the solution? CENDIKIA, 13(5), 917-924.
Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan (Dirjen GTK). (2024). Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Tahun 2023: Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika 2023. Dirjen GTK Kemendikbud.
Fleming, N.D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory,Rrather A Catalyst for Reflection. A Journal of Educational Development, 11(1), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.
Gerakan Sekolah Menyenangkan (GSM). (2020). Gerakan Sekolah Menyenangkan: Panduan Pelaksanaan. Gerakan Sekolah Menyenangkan. https://sekolahmenyenangkan.or.id/tag/panduan/
Irfan, M. (2020). Challenges During The Pandemic: Use of E-Learning in Mathematics Learning in Higher Education. Infinity, 9(2), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p147-158
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner. Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
Kusaeri. (2019). Learning outcome of mathematics and science: Features of Indonesian madrasah students. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i1.24881
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Bisson, P., & George, K. (2017). Artificial Intelligence: The Next Digital Frontier?. McKinsey Global Institute.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. OECD.
Schneider, B. (2016). Childhood Friendships and Peer Relations. Routledge.
SMP Negeri 4 Geyer. (2022). Laporan Tahunan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika 2022. [Dokumen Internal Sekolah].
Shudur, M. (2019). Manfaat Belajar Kelompok dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Sumbula, 4(2).
Tandibua, A. N. (2016). Efektifitas Pembelajaran Matematika melalui Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) pada Siswa Kelas VIIIB SMP Negeri 1 Galesong Selatan Kab. Takalar (Skripsi Universitas Muhammadiyah Makasar).
Valkenburg, P.M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and Adolescents’ Online Communication and Their Closeness to Friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
Wentzel, K.R. (1998). Social Relationships and Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202.