RESOLUSI KONFLIK DALAM ISLAMIC STUDIES: PERSPEKTIF HARMONISASI ANTAR UMAT BERAGAMA RICHARD C. MARTIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/lijid.v7i2.5546Abstract
Disharmony among religious communities in the era of globalization has become a focal point for religious observers, as it often gives rise to complex issues in Europe, North America, and other parts of the world. This article will explore the importance of Islamic studies in understanding the complexity of relationships between Islam and other cultures and religions. It will utilize Richard C. Martin's multidisciplinary approach to Islamic studies. The research method employed is qualitative-normative, focusing on literature review and the concepts of cross-cultural dialogue and inclusivity within the context of global religious diversity. The findings of the research indicate that Martin's approach, which advocates for inclusivity and cross-cultural dialogue, is the best way to promote a deeper understanding of religions and to reduce global conflicts. Understanding the historical approach, phenomenological approach, theological approach, comparative religions approach, and structuralist approach is one of Martin's methods to achieve an inclusive interpretation of religions broadly, especially Islam. Such an understanding can lead to better global peace and cooperation. Martin's ideas offer profound insights into how Islamic studies can play a crucial role in building harmony among religious communities, particularly as a means of resolving conflicts through comparative methods. His approach underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of the historical, social, and cultural contexts of religions to foster mutual respect and cooperation in a multicultural world.
Keywords: Resolution, Conflict, Islamic Studies, Harmonization
Disharmoni antar umat beragama di era globalisasi menjadi sorotan para pemerhati agama karena sering kali melahirkan persoalan kompleks seperti di Eropa, Amerika Utara maupun di belahan dunia lainnya. Artikel ini akan mengulas pentingnya studi keislaman (islamic studies) dalam memahami kompleksitas hubungan antara Islam dengan budaya dan agama lain. Artikel ini akan menggunakan pemikiran Richard C. Martin sebagai pendekatan multidisipliner dalam Islamic studies. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif-normatif dengan mengkaji literatur Pustaka (liberary research) dan konsep dialog lintas budaya dan inklusivitas dalam konteks keberagaman religius global. Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan Martin, yang menganjurkan inklusivitas dan dialog lintas budaya, adalah cara terbaik untuk mempromosikan pemahaman yang lebih dalam tentang agama-agama dan mengurangi konflik global. Memahami pendekatan historis, pendekatan fenomenologis, pendekatan teologis, pendekatan perbandingan agama, dan pendekatan strukturalis adalah salah satu metode Martin untuk mencapai interpretasi inklusif terhadap agama-agama secara luas, khususnya Islam. Pemahaman seperti ini dapat membawa kepada perdamaian dan kerja sama global yang lebih baik. Gagasan Martin menawarkan wawasan yang mendalam tentang bagaimana studi Islam dapat memainkan peran penting dalam membangun keharmonisan di antara umat beragama, terutama sebagai sarana untuk menyelesaikan konflik melalui metode komparatif. Pendekatannya menggarisbawahi perlunya pemahaman yang komprehensif mengenai konteks sejarah, sosial, dan budaya agama-agama untuk menumbuhkan rasa saling menghormati dan kerja sama dalam dunia yang Multi-kultural.
Kata Kunci: Resolusi, Konflik, Islamic Studies, Harmonisasi
References
Abd Muhaimin, Indal Abror. “The Transmission of Fundamentalist Ideology in the Method of Legal Ijtihad: A Study of Ahmad Hassan’s Interpretation of the Qur’an in the Book al-Furqon Transmisi Ideologi Fundamentalis Dalam Metode Ijtihad Hukum: Telaah Penafsiran al-Qur’an A. Hassan Dalam Kitab al-Furqon,” n.d.
Abdullah, M Amin. “Agama, Ilmu Dan Budaya: Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi Keilmuan.” Jakarta: Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, 2013.
Abdullah, M. Amin, and D. Abdurahman. “Metodologi Penelitian Agama: Pendekatan Multidisipliner.” Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2006.
Al-Amri, Limyah, and Muhammad Haramain. “Akulturasi Islam Dalam Budaya Lokal.” KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan 10, no. 2 (2017): 87–100.
Al-Azizi, Abdul Syukur. Untold Islamic History. Laksana, 2018.
Arif, Mahmud. “Pendidikan Agama Islam Inklusifmultikultural.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 1, no. 1 (2012): 1–18.
Capps, Walter H. Religious Studies: The Making of a Discipline. Fortress Press, 1995.
Devi, Aulia Diana, and Seka Andrean. “Implementasi Pendekatan Teologis Normatif Dalam Pluralisme Beragama Di Indonesia.” TA’LIM: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam 4, no. 1 (2021): 60–73.
Dewi, Kartini Kusuma. “Methodology Of Interpretation With Structuralism Approach In Adam Prophet’S Story.” Journal of Islam and Science 6, no. 1 (2019): 1–7.
Ernst, Carl W., and Richard C. Martin. “Introduction: Toward a Post-Orientalist Islamic Approach to Islamic Religious Studies.” Rethinking Islamic Studies, 2010, 1–19.
Hourani, Albert. Islam in European Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Husnayain, Muhammad Faizul, and Agus Salim. “Teologi Perubahan Sosial Di Dunia Islam.” Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum 8, no. 1 (2022): 65–67.
Iqbal, T. “The Phenomenological Approach in Islamic Studies: An Overview of a Western Attempt to Understand Islam.” The Muslim World 91, no. 3–4 (2001): 425–50.
Ismail, Roni. “Resolusi Konflik Keagamaan Integratif: Studi Atas Resolusi Konflik Sosial Keagamaan Ambon.” Living Islam: Journal of Islamic Discourses 3, no. 2 (2020): 451–69.
Ismail, Roni, Abidin Wakano, and Genoveva Leasiwal. “Resolusi Konflik Keagamaan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal: Studi Atas Pela Gandong Di Ambon.” Living Islam: Journal of Islamic Discourses 5, no. 1 (2022): 93–108.
Izutsu, Toshihiko. “God and Man in the Qur’an.” Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2002.
Izutsu, TTAFH. “The Concept of Belief in Islamic Theology: Asemantical Analysis of Imān and Islām.” Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 1994.
Janah, Nasitotul. “Pendekatan Normativitas Dan Historisitas Serta Implikasinya Dalam Perkembangan Pemikiran Islam.” Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam 13, no. 2 (2018): 102–19.
Marranci, Gabriele. Muslim Societies and the Challenge of Secularization: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Vol. 1. Springer, 2010.
MARTIN, PRESPEKTIF RICHARD C. “Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama,” n.d.
Martin, Richard C. “Approaches to Islam in Religious Studies,” 1988.
———. “Approaches to Islam in Religious Studies,” 1988.
———. “Post-Mu’tazilah: Genealogi Konflik Rasionalisme Dan Tradisionalisme Islam, Terj.” Muhammad Syukri. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2002.
Martin, Richard C., M. Amin Abdullah, Zakiyuddin Baidhawy, and Adyana Sunanda. “Pendekatan Kajian Islam Dalam Studi Agama.” (No Title), 2001.
Mufidah, Luk Luk Nur. “Pendekatan Teologis Dalam Kajian Islam.” Jurnal Misykat 2, no. 1 (2017): 151–62.
Mun’im, Zainul. “TEORI NASIKH-MANSUKH AL-QUR’AN SEBAGAI PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM ISLAM DALAM PEMIKIRAN ABDULLAHI AHMED AN-NA’IM DAN MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR.” Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2014).
Mun’im, Zainul, Muhamad Nasrudin, Suaidi Suaidi, and Hasanudin Hasanudin. “Revisioning Official Islam in Indonesia: The Role of Women Ulama Congress in Reproducing Female Authority in Islamic Law.” AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 24, no. 1 (2024).
Nanji, Azim. Mapping Islamic Studies: Genealogy, Continuity, and Change. Vol. 38. Walter de Gruyter, 1997.
Ochsenwald, William. “Richard C. Martin (1938–2019).” Review of Middle East Studies 54, no. 2 (2020): 326–27.
Piper, Michael Collins. The High Priests of War. Stranger Journalism, 2004.
Ritonga, Paisal Ipanda, M Hafiz, and Zaini Dahlan. “Sejarah Islam Kontemporer Di Dunia Barat.” Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu 2, no. 1 (2024): 163–69.
Said, Edward W. Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. Penguin UK, 2016.
Santoso, Dri, and Muhamad Nasrudin. “Persepsi Akademisi Muslim Di Kota Metro Terhadap Ajaran Mendirikan Negara Islam.” Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam 8, no. 1 (2021).
Schimmel, Annemarie, and Sapardi Djoko Djoko Damono. Dimensi Mistik Dalam Islam. Pustaka Firdaus, 2000.
Strauss, Leo. “Natural Right and the Historical Approach.” The Review of Politics 12, no. 4 (1950): 422–42.
Suaidi, Suaidi. “Historiografi Perkembangan Keragaman Hukum Islam; Dari Era Rasulullah Ke Fikih Mazdhab.” NAHNU: Journal of Nahdlatul Ulama and Contemporary Islamic Studies 1, no. 1 (2023): 77–92.
Suaidi, Suaidi, and Akhmad Farid Mawardi Sufyan. “CONTEMPORARY FIQH CONSTRUCTION FOR PROGRESSIVE ISLAMIC BUSINESS ETHICS IN THE SOCIETY 5.0 ERA:: Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities.” ALFIQH Islamic Law Review Journal 2, no. 3 (2023): 135–52.
Waardenburg, Jean Jacques. Muslims as Actors: Islamic Meanings and Muslim Interpretations in the Perspective of the Study of Religions. Vol. 46. Walter de Gruyter, 2007.
Whaling, Frank. “Comparative Approaches.” Contemporary Approaches to the Study of Religion 1 (1984): 165–295.
Zuhdi, Ahmad. “Pandangan Orientalis Barat Tentang Islam, Antara Yang Menghujat Dan Yang Memuji, Surabaya: PT.” Karya Pembina Swajaya, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suaidi Suaidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.