PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM CORPORATE SOSIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) DAN KOMUNIKASI CSR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v12i1.1542Keywords:
Implementasi, Komunikasi, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), PerusahaanAbstract
Abstrak. Program Corporate Social Responsibility semakin marak dilakukan seiring dengan tingginya kesadaran perusahaan untuk berlaku etis dan transparan dalam menjalankan bisnisnya, sehingga beranggapan bahwa CSR bisa menjadi salah satu bentuk nyata tanggung jawab perusahaan. Tidak hanya melaksanakan kegiatan CSR, akan tetapi perlu juga untuk mengkomunikasikan program CSR kepada stakeholder karena selain bentuk transparansi juga mensosialisasikan program demi mewujudkan mutual understanding dengan seluruh stakeholder. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pelaksanaan program CSR dan komunikasi CSR perusahaan di dua negara yaitu Malaysia yang diwakili Delegation of the European Union to Malaysia dan perusahaan Indonesia yang diwakili oleh PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk Cilacap Plant Indonesia. Metode studi kasus digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan menimbang kedua negara memiliki kesamaan karakteristik kebudayaan dan teknik pengumpulan data akan dilakukan indepth interview. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan program CSR kedua perusahaan tersebut lebih banyak pada pemberdayaan masyarakat (community empowerment) dengan memberikan banyak workshop dan pendampingan dalam kebutuhan utama masyarakat di kesehatan, pendidikan, termasuk pemberian subsidi modal untuk peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat penerima manfaat. Kedua perusahaan juga melakukan kegiatan komunikasi kepada masyarakat penerima manfaat program dengan komunikasi dua arah (two way communication) dialogis antar perusahaan dan masyarakat. Bagi Delegation of the European Union to Malaysia, CSR merupakan upaya perusahaan membangun masyarakat dan menciptakan visibilitas perusahaan. Sedangkan untuk perusahaan Indonesia, PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk Cilacap Plant Indonesia, menganggap CSR merupakan kontribusi tanggung jawab perusahaan dengan meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat dan secara tidak langsung akan berdampak positif untuk reputasi perusahaan. Kata Kunci: Pelaksanaan, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Komunikasi PerusahaanAbstract: The program of Corporate Social Responsibility is increasingly prevalent in line with the high awareness of the company to act ethically and transparently in carrying out its business, so that it is assumed that CSR can be a real form of corporate responsibility. Not only carrying out CSR activities, but also need to communicate CSR programs to stakeholders because in addition to the form of transparency also socialize the program in order to realize mutual understanding with all stakeholders. This study aims to explore the implementation of CSR programs and CSR communications of companies in two countries, represented by PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk Cilacap Plant Indonesia and the Delegation of the European Union to Malaysia. The case study method will be used in this study by considering the two countries have similar cultural characteristics and the technique of data collection will be conducted in an interview. The results showed that the implementation of CSR programs by the two companies was carried out by providing support in community development activities through capacity building in the form of training and mentoring in the fields of education, health and the environment and providing business capital assistance in the economy / MSME. In implementing the CSR program, the two companies also conduct communication activities to the beneficiaries of the program with dialogical two-way communication between companies and the community. For PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk Cilacap Plant Indonesia, CSR is a contribution of the company to realize public welfare and increase the company's positive reputation in the eyes of its stakeholders. As for the Delegation of the European Union to Malaysia, C SR is an effort by the company to build a community and create corporate visibility. Keywords: Implementation, Communication, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Company
Downloads
References
Buku:
Cresswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif and Mixed.Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ife, Jim. (2002). Community Development: Community Based Alternatives In An Age Of Globalisation, Pearson. Education Australia, Limited Australia.
Kotler, P dan N. Lee. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility, Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. New Jersey: Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Miles, M.B & Huberman, A.M 1984, Qualitative Data Analysis : A Sourcebook of New Methods, London: Sage Publications.
Morsing M, Schultz M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies. Business Ethics: An European Review. 5(4):323-338.
Rudito,Bambang, & Melia F, 2013.CSR Bandung:Rekayasa Sains
Rusdianto, Ujang. 2013. CSR Communications A Framework for PR Practitioners. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Jurnal
Jurnal:
Aguilera, Ruth V., Deborah E. Rupp, Cynthia A. Williams, and Jyoti Ganapathi. (2007). Putting The S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3: pp. 836 – 863.
Antonio Tencati, Francesco Perrini and Stefano Pogutz, (2004). New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 53, No. 1/2, Building Ethical Institutions for Business: Sixteenth Annual Conference of the European Business Ethics Network (EBEN) pp.173-190
Amita V. Joseph, (2009). Successful Examples of Corporate Social Responsibility Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 44, No. 3, Corporate Social Responsibility pp. 402-409
Becchetti, Leonardo & Rocco Ciciretti, (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance, Working Paper, CEIS Tor Vergata – Research Paper Series, Vol. 27, No. 79, March : pp. 1 – 30
Chand, Masud, (2007), The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance: Industry Type as a Boundary Condition, The Business Review, Cambridge, Vol. 5, No. 1 (September): pp. 240 – 245
Kolstad, Ivar, (2007), Why Firms Should Not Always Maximize Profits, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 76: pp. 137 – 145
Mackey, Alison, Tyson B. Mackey, and Jay B. Barney, (2007), Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3: pp. 817 – 835
Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, Laporan Penelitian:
Sholeh, Arif. 2010. Peran Tanggungjawab Sosial Perusahaan Pertambangan Emas Agricount Resources Dalam Upaya Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Batangtoru Tapanuli Selatan. Disertasi.
Sutopo, HB. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar Teori dan Terapannya Dalam Penelitian, Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi by submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
Profetik's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Profetik permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Profetik on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy), The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Profetik will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Profetik will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that Profetik entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Profetik will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. Profetik's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.