DISTINGSI KEILMUAN SOSIOLOGI AGAMA (Sejarah Perkembangan, Epistemologi, dan Kontribusi Praksis)

Main Article Content

Moh Soehadha

Abstract

Sociology studies of religion today have developed in various Islamic colleges in Indonesia. As a science developed in universities, the sociology of religion is built with a strong epistemological foundation. Unlike the sociology of religion developed from sociology in public universities, the sociology of religion in Islamic higher education is also influenced by the Comparative Science of Religion or the Study of Religions. The following article describes the development of religious sociology studies at the UIN Sunan Kalijaga which is distinctive. The distinction of the study of the sociology of religion is influenced by the history of the development of religious sociology study programs and the praxis of religious sociology to solve social and religious problems in Indonesia.

 

Studi sosiologi agama dewasa ini telah berkembang di berbagai perguruan tinggi agama Islam di Indonesia. Sebagai ilmu pengetahuan yang dikembangkan di perguruan tinggi,  maka sosiologi agama dibangun dengan landasan  epistemologi yang kuat. Berbeda dengan sosiologi agama yang dikembangkan dari ilmu sosiologi yang ada di perguruan tinggi umum, sosiologi agama di perguruan tinggi agama Islam juga dipengaruhi oleh Ilmu Perbandingan Agama atau Studi Agama-agama. Tulisan berikut mendeskripsikan tentang perkembangan studi sosiologi agama di UIN Sunan Kalijaga yang bersifat distingtif. Distingsi kajian sosiologi agama tersebut dipengaruhi oleh sejarah perkembangan program studi sosiologi agama dan kebutuhan praksis sosiologi agama untuk menyelesaikan problem sosial keagamaan di Indonesia.

Article Details

How to Cite
Soehadha, M. (2018). DISTINGSI KEILMUAN SOSIOLOGI AGAMA (Sejarah Perkembangan, Epistemologi, dan Kontribusi Praksis). Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, 12(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2018.121-02
Section
Articles

References

Abdullah, Amin. 1996. Studi agama: Normativitas atau historisitas?, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Berger, Peter L. 1991. Langit Suci; Agama Sebagai Realitas Sosial. Jakarta : LP3ES

Bowie Fiona. 2000. The Anthropology Of Religion; An Introduction. Massachusetts: Blacwell Publisher Ltd.

Hollway, Wendy and Jefferson, Tony. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research Differently. London: Sage Publication Inc.

Jorgensen, Danny, l. Participation Observation. A Methodology for Human Studies. California: Sage Publications Inc.

Krueger, Richard A. 1988. Focus Group a Practical Guide for Applied Research. California: Sage Publication Inc.

Lessa. William A. & Vogt, Evov Z. 1965. Reader In Comparative Religion; an anthropological Approach. New York: Harper & Row Publisehr.

McGuire, Meredith B. 1992. Religion: The Social Context. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Notttingham, Elisabeth K. 1943. Religion and Society. New York.

Permata, Ahmad Norma. 2000. Metodologi Studi Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality (New York: Penguin Books Ltd, 1979), 13

Peter. L. Berger, Langit Suci Agama Sebagai Realitas Sosial (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1991), hlm. 4.

Scharf, Beety.R. 1995. Kajian Sosiologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Schneider, Louise. 1970. Sociological Approach To Religion. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Singarimbun, Masri dan Sofian Effendi. Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta : LP3ES 1982.

Suharsimi Arikonto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1993).

Surajiyo. Filsafat Ilmu dan Perkembanganya Di Indonesia. Bumi Aksasara. Jakarta : 2007

Surahmad,Winarno. Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Tarsito, 1980.

Tibi, Bassam. 1999. Islam Kebudayaan dan Perubahan Sosial. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Wach, Joachim.1962. Sociology Of Religion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

------------------.1967 The Meaning and Task of History of The Religion, dalam J. Kitagawa, M. Elliade, and Charles H. Long (ed), The History Of Religions, Chicago University Press.