KATA FATIS PENANDA KETIDAKSANTUNAN PRAGMATIK DALAM RANAH KELUARGA

R. Kunjana Rahardi, Yuliana Setyaningsih, Rishe Purnama Dewi

Abstract


One of the pragmatic markers, which shows language impoliteness, is classified in phatic category. This research aims to analyze the phatic discourse particles serving as pragmatic markers of impoliteness. Therefore, the data in this research are the utterances containing phatic discourse markers showing linguistic impoliteness taken from the family of farmers, traders, fishermen, teachers, and noblemen. The data were gathered by employing the listening and speaking methods. The data gathering techniques are the recording and transcribing. The data are classified and analyzed using contextual method. This research indicates that there are 11 categories of phatic discourse markers showing pragmatic impoliteness. They are phatic markers of “kok”, “ah”, “hayo”, “mbok”, “lha”, “tak”, “huu”, “iih”, “woo”, “hei”, and “halah”. Every phatic category conveys a specific intention which is different from other phatic discourse markers.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bousfiled, Derek dan Miriam A. Lacher (eds.). 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2008. “Reflections in Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power” dalam Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hymes, Dell. 1972. “The Ethnography of Speaking”, di dalam Fishman, Readings in the Sociology of Language. Paris: Mouton.

Locher, Miriam A dan Derek Bousfield. 2008. “Impoliteness and Power in Language” dalam Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Mey, Jacob L. 1998. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. New York: Pergamon.

Parker, Frank. 1986. Linguistics for Non Linguists. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2006. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Terkourafi, Marina. 2008. “Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness”, dalam Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and 174.

Verschueren, Jeff. 2005. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Watts, Richard J, Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehlich. 2005. Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Watts, Richard J and Miriam A. Locher. 2008. “Relational work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistics Behavior”, dalam Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2014.13201

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 R. Kunjana Rahardi Yuliana Setyaningsih Rishe Purnama Dewi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

     

ISSN: 2549-1482 (p); 2549-2047 (e)

Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, Accreditation Number (Ministry of RTHE/DIKTI): 10/E/KPT/2019

Indexed by:

       

Adabiyyāt Office:

Faculty of Adab and Cultural Sciences Building, 3rd Floor
Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
Jl. Marsda Adisucipto Yogyakarta 55281 Indonesia
Telephone Number: +62-274-513949
e-mailadabiyyat@uin-suka.ac.id
http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/adab/Adabiyyat/
 

Creative Commons License

All Publications by Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.