KATA FATIS PENANDA KETIDAKSANTUNAN PRAGMATIK DALAM RANAH KELUARGA

Authors

  • R. Kunjana Rahardi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta
  • Yuliana Setyaningsih Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta
  • Rishe Purnama Dewi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2014.13201

Abstract

One of the pragmatic markers, which shows language impoliteness, is classified in phatic category. This research aims to analyze the phatic discourse particles serving as pragmatic markers of impoliteness. Therefore, the data in this research are the utterances containing phatic discourse markers showing linguistic impoliteness taken from the family of farmers, traders, fishermen, teachers, and noblemen. The data were gathered by employing the listening and speaking methods. The data gathering techniques are the recording and transcribing. The data are classified and analyzed using contextual method. This research indicates that there are 11 categories of phatic discourse markers showing pragmatic impoliteness. They are phatic markers of “kok”, “ah”, “hayo”, “mbok”, “lha”, “tak”, “huu”, “iih”, “woo”, “hei”, and “halah”. Every phatic category conveys a specific intention which is different from other phatic discourse markers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bousfiled, Derek dan Miriam A. Lacher (eds.). 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2008. “Reflections in Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power” dalam Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hymes, Dell. 1972. “The Ethnography of Speaking”, di dalam Fishman, Readings in the Sociology of Language. Paris: Mouton.

Locher, Miriam A dan Derek Bousfield. 2008. “Impoliteness and Power in Language” dalam Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Mey, Jacob L. 1998. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. New York: Pergamon.

Parker, Frank. 1986. Linguistics for Non Linguists. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Rahardi, Kunjana. 2006. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Terkourafi, Marina. 2008. “Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness”, dalam Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and 174.

Verschueren, Jeff. 2005. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Watts, Richard J, Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehlich. 2005. Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Watts, Richard J and Miriam A. Locher. 2008. “Relational work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistics Behavior”, dalam Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-19

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

  1. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra publishes all articles entirely in full text.
  2. It is permissible for readers to download and to use it for scientific purposes and scientific dissemination.
  3. The author can re-publish the article that has been published by the Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra after obtaining written permission from the editor. This letter can be obtained by submitting a request letter for permission to republish the article to Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra via email adabiyyat@uin-suka.ac.id. In the second publication, the author is required to include information that the article was firstly published by the Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra.

How to Cite

KATA FATIS PENANDA KETIDAKSANTUNAN PRAGMATIK DALAM RANAH KELUARGA. (2014). Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 13(2), 149-175. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2014.13201