KLASIFIKASI ARTIKEL-ARTIKEL JURNAL PUSTAKALOKA BERDASARKAN SKEMA JITA
Abstract
This research aims to determine the classification of articles in journal of Pustakaloka, and specifically to identify the largest and smallest subject groups based on JITA Classification System of Library and Information Science. Data for this research consist of 174 articles from 2009-2021 publication. To assign the subject of an article, its title and keywords were analyzed. Abstract and article content were also analyzed if the title and keywords were not able to reflect the subject. The data were coded according to the JITA scheme, sorted and counted to build up subject groups. The three largest subject groups are Users, literacy and reading, followed by Information sources, supports, channels, then by Management and Information technology and library technology. Meanwhile, the three smallest subject groups are Information use and sociology of information, followed by Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information, Housing technologies, and the last is Publishing and legal issues. This research identified that in general, the articles in Pustakaloka are concentrated on some of intermediate and specific level that cover the aspect of users, directional and management functions, pragmatic and technical issues.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Davarpanah, M., & Aslekia, S. (2008). A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1803-z
De Robbio, A., & Coll, I. S. (2014). E-LIS: Unique model for subject specific open access repository. Informatics Studies, 1(1), 8-29. https://www.informaticsstudies.org/index.php/informatics/article/view/6
Islam, M. S., Islam, M. N., & Mondal, M. (2018). Research trends in library and information science in Bangladesh: An analytical study, 6(2), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2018.6.2.3
Istiqomah, Z., Dewi, A. N., & Suwignyo, H. (2021). Knowledge mapping bidang ilmu perpustakaan dengan metode nine basics of information science. Pustakaloka, 13(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v13i1.2445
Kawalec, A. (2013). Research trends in library and information science based on Spanish scientific publication 2000 to 2010. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 18(2), 1–13. http://mjs.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/1864
Keshet, Y. (2011). Classification systems in the light of sociology of knowledge. Journal of Documentation, 67(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111105489
Lamba, M., & Madhusudhan, M. (2019). Mapping of topics in DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, India: A study. Scientometrics, 120(2), 477–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03137-5
Lambert, S. (2015). The importance of classification to business model research. Journal of Business Models, 3(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jbm.v3i1.1045
Liu, G., & Yang, L. (2019). Popular research topics in the recent journal publications of library and information science. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.04.001
Naseer, M. M., & Mahmood, K. (2014). Subject dispersion of LIS research in Pakistan. Library & Information Science Research, 36(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.10.005
Osorio, N. (2014). An analysis of subject coverage and worldwide involvement of E-LIS: The international repository for library and information science. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1-11. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1067
Prebor, G. (2010). Analysis of the interdisciplinary nature of library and information science. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 42(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000610380820
Quagraine, N. T., & Agyekum, B. O. (2018). In vogue: Demand for scholarly publications among academic librarians. Library Management, 39(6–7), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-11-2017-0119
Satija, M. P., & Martinez-Avila, D. (2015). Features, functions and components of a library classification system in the LIS tradition for the e-environment. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(4), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2015.3.4.5
Shevtsova, Y., & Shemaieva, H. (2020). Content analysis of European library and information science journals. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 8, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v8i1.540
Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/9/
Wen-Yau, C. L., & Ka, M. L. (2011). Research status and trends of Library and Information Science in Taiwan, 2001–2010. Proceedings of the ASIA-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice, 530–538.
Widyaningsih, N., & Komalasari, M. D. (2020). Klasifikasi hewan berdasarkan jenis makanan. UPY Press.
Wiegand, S. (2013). Beginning the conversation: Discussing scholarly communication. The Serials Librarian 65 (3-4), 335-349. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0361526X.2013.833883
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/fhrs.2022.171.20-37
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Fihris Office:
All Publications by Fihris: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
