Debate on Muhkamât and Mutasyahabihat A Study of Quraish Shihab’ Thought

Sukamta Sukamta

Abstract


The current paper is dedicated to examine Quraish Shihab’s views on Muhkamât and Mutasyahabihat. The method applied in this study is critical analysis by comparing various reference of his works. I am interested in this topic because it is related to the Qur’anic Studies. I found that not all muhkamat verses are disputed, some of them remained clear. In the discussion around the texts of the mutasyabihat, Quraish Shihab did not mention the views of sufi thought such as Ibn Arabi who used the 'irfani’s perspective. In addition, his study of mutasyabihat verses related to God's attributes and deeds can be found deeper in other works, by using an intertextual analysis. It is found that Quraish Shihab did not relate majaz when he discussed it. The majaz style in the Qur'an, among others, is used to expand the function of the language description, to accommodate as many ideas or meanings as possible, by giving a picture or imagination in such a way as to be understood by man, as a being to whom the Qur'an is derived. Since the verses are addressed to humans to understand, the symbols used also in the form of language understood by humans.

Keywords


Muhkamamat; Mutasyabiha; Majaz

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar al-Badakhsya>ni, Muhammad. Al-Bala>ghah as-Sa>fiyah, Karatsi, 1416 H

Abdurrahman Hasan Habannakah al-Maida>ni, al-bala>ghah al-Arabiyyah, ususha, wa ulu>muha, wa funu>nuha, Damakus: Dar al-qalam: 1997

Abdul Wahab Abdus Salam T}awi>lah, asar al-Lughah fi> ikhtila>f al-Mujtahidi>n, Kairo: Dar as-Salam, 1414 H

‘Ali Harb.Naqd an-Nas}s}. Bairut: al-Markaz as-S|aqa>fi al- ‘Araby, 1995

Ahmad Abu Zaid. al-Manha> al-I’tiza>li fi> al-Baya>n wa i’ja>z al-Qur’a>n (Rabat: Maktabah al-Ma ‘a>rif, 1986)

’Abiri. M. Binyat al-’Aql al-’Arabi, Dira>sah Tahli>liyyah Naqdiyyah li Nuz}um al-Ma’rifah fi> as-S|aqa>fah al-’Arabiyyah.(Bairut: Markaz Dira>sa>t al-Wihdah al-’Arabiyyah, 1992)

M.Abu Zahrah. al-Mu ‘jizah al-Kubra> , al-Qur’a>n. (ttp: Dar al-Fikr al- ‘Arabi, 1970), P. 250

Ahmed an-Na’im. Abdullahi, Toward an Islamic Reformation, Civil Liberties, Human Rights and International Law. alih bahasa Ahmad Suaedy dan Amiruddin Arrani. Yogyakarta: LKiS-Pustaka Pelajar, 1997.

Bambang Sugiharto, I,Postmodernisme, Tantangan bagi Filsafat. (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1996).

Baid}awi, anwa.r at-tanzi>l wa asra>r at-Ta’wi>l,

David Stewart.Exploring the Philosophy of Religion.(New Jersey: Prentice Hall inc, 1992)

Gazza>li. al-, Ih}ya> Ulu>m ad-Di>n. (Bairut: Da>r al-Fikr, tt)

Ibnu Ar, at-Tahri>r wa at-Tanwi>r,

Ibnu Arabi. Muhyiddin, al-Futu>h}a>t al-Makkiyyah. (Kairo: al-Maktabah al-Arabiyyah, 1972). Jilid I

Joel C.Weinsheimer. Gadamer ‘s Hermeneutics, a reading of Truth and Method. (New York: Yale University, 1985)

John Wild. et.al. Hermeneutics, Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer. (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969)

Josef bleicher. Contemporary Hermeneutics. London: Routledge &Kegan Paul:1980),

Joel C.Weinsheimer. Gadamer ‘s Hermeneutics, a reading of Truth and Method. (New York: Yale University, 1985)

Mustafa Ghula>yaini, ja>mi‘ ad-Duru>s al-‘Arabiyyah,

Quraish Shihab, M. Kaidah Tafsir, Tangerang: Lentera Hati, cet ke II, 2013,

_____, Membumikan al-Qur’an Jilid 2, Memfungsikan Wahyu dalam Kehidupan, Tangerang: Lentera hati, 2011

_____, DIA DI MANA-MANA, “Tangan” Tuhan Di Balik Setiap Fenomena, Tangerang: Lentera Hati, cet XIV, 2015

_____, Secercah Cahaya Ilahi, Hidup Bersama al-Qur’an, Bandung: Mizan Pustaka, 2013

Nas}r Ha>mid Abu Zaid.Falsafah at-Ta’wi>l, Dira>sah fi> Ta’wi>l al-Qur’a>n ‘inda Muhyi ad-Di>n Ibnu ‘Arabi (Bairut: al-Markaz as-S|aqa>fi al-’Arabi, 1996)

Nasr Ha>mid Abu Zaid. Naqd al-Khita>b al-Di>ni>. (Kairo: Si>na, 1992)

Subh}i as}-S{a>lih}. Maba>his fi> Ulu>m al-Qur’a>n. (Bairut: Da>r al-’Ilmi li al-Mala>yi>n, 1988)

Sukamto Said. "al-Maja>z fi al-Qur’a>n, Dira>sah ‘an al-Musykilah al-must}alakhiyyah wa al-Lugawiyyah” dalam Al-Jami’ah, journal of Islamic Studies. No: 60, Th: 1997

Yusuf Ali. A. The Holy Qur’an, Text, Translation and Commentary. Mryland: Amana Corp, 1983

Wa>hidi, Al- Tafsir al-Waji>z,

Sayyid Qutub, Tafsi>r fi> Z}ila>l al-Qur’a>n

Sayyid Thantawi, Tafsi>r al-Wasi>t}, (12/ 182

Zarkasyi. Az-, al-Burha>n fi> ‘Ulu>m al-Qur’a>n. (ttp: Da>r ihya> al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, 1957) Juz II,

Zamakhsyari, Az-, al-kasysya>f




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/skijic.v5i1.1218

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.