Framing Information and its Impact on Saving Decision in Conventional and Sharia Banks: Experimental Study of Students of the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business in Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Ipuk Widayanti iB Research Grant Program, Department of Islamic Banking, Financial Services Authority (OJK), Email: dpbs@ojk.go.id

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2015.031-02

Keywords:

Framing effects, Risky Choice Framing, Consumer Behaviour, Attribute Framing, Complex Decision Making, Saving Decision Making, Islamic Banks, Conventional Bank

Abstract

Islamic and Conventional Banks in delivering information of margin in saving product have different ways.  Islamic bank uses “nisbah” while conventional bank uses interest. Both have different words and disclosure but in the nominal calculation of nisbah and interest is same, because Islamic bank uses Profit Equilization Reserve which the function is as allowance, and to simply it, Islamic banking informs that to consumer as Equivalent Rate. By using Attribute Framing and Risky Choice Framing this research aims to test the information frame of nisbah and interest and it influences on saving decision making. Quasi Experiment Model is used with 49 students of Islamic Economic Studies as subject of experimental group and 20 students of other studies except Islamic Economic as subject of control group. Experimental design of this research is between subject 2X2 by using 2 cases and Random Assignment technique. Two Way ANOVA is used as analitical tool. The result of this research is when information of margin is framed in gain domain/positive frame and loss domain/positive frame subject decision in saving is less risky while when information of margin is framed in gain domain/negative frame and loss domain/negative frame subject decision in saving is risk seeking. The largest framing effect is on the certain/probability (gain domain/positive frame) and the smallest effect is on uncertain/presentation (loss domain/negative frame).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract viewed: 395 times | PDF downloaded = 419 times

References

Assael, Henry. 2004. Consumer Behavior : A Strategic Approach, Boston : Houghton Mifflin Company

Bazerman, Max H. 1994, Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, New York : John Wiley and Son, Inc.

Bonner, Sarah. 2008. Judgement and Decision Making In Accounting. Pearson Prentice Hall

Cozby, Paul C. 2005. Methods in Behavioral Research. New York: McGraw Hill Companies

Dermawan, Rizky. 2004. Pengambilan keputusan : Landasan Filosofis, Konsep dan Aplikasi, Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta

Diana, Ilfi Nur. 2008. “Hadis-Hadis Ekonomi”. SUKSES Offset : Yogyakarta

Kertajaya, Hendrawan & M. Syakir Sula. 2006. Syariah Marketing, Bandung : Mizan

Sekaran, Uma. (2003). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, New York-USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Suarnata, I Wayan. 2010, Akuntansi Keperilakuan, Yogyakarta : ANDI

Sukirno, Sadono. 2012. Makro Ekonomi Teori Pengantar: Edisis Ketiga. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada

Yaya, Rizal dkk. 2009. Akuntansi Perbankan Syariah Teori dan Praktik Kontemporer, Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Amril Arifin & Indra Wijaya Kusuma, Pengaruh Framing Pada Keputusan Akuntansi Managerial dalam Perspektif Individu Kelompok. 2006

Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, The Framing of Decision and the Psychologi of Choice. 1981 : Science, New Series, Vol. 211, No. 4481. (Jan. 30, 1981), pp. 453-458

Badri Munir Sukoco dan Melinda Ratna Puspa Ayu, Pengaruh Message Framing dan Endorser pada Sikap Konsumen terhadap Bank Syariah, 2013: Jurnal Manajemen Usahawan Indonesia Vol. 42 No. 3| Juli-September 2013|ISN: 0302-9859

Irwin P. Levin & Gary J. Gaeth, How Consumer Are Affected by the Framing of Atttribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product. 1988

Irwin P. Levin, et al. A New Look at Framing Effects: Distribution of Effects Sizes, Individual Differences, and Independence of Types of Effect. 2002: National Foundation grant SES-0001316

Mirja Hubert & Peter Kenning, A Current Overview of Consumer Neuroscience. 2008 : Journal of Consumer Behaviour J. Consumer Behav. 7: 272-292 Wiley InterScience

Marco Stoll, Sebastian Baecke & Peter Kenning, What They See is What They Get? An FMRI-study on Neural Correlates of Attractive Packaging. 2008: Journal of Consumer Behaviour J. Consumer Behav. 7: 342-359 Wiley InterScience

Peter, J. Paul & Jerry C. Olson. 1996. Consumer Behaviour and Marketing Strategy, Jakarta : Erlangga

Rahmatina A. Kasri & Salina Hj. Kassim, Empirical Determinants of Saving in Islamic Banks: Evidence from Indonesia. 2009: JKAU: Islamic Econ, vol.22, pp: 181-201 (2009 A.D./1430 A.H)

Shlomi Sher & Craig R. M. McKenzie. 2008. Framing Effects.

Shahih Bukhari 0501-2247

http//www.PikiranRakyat.com

http//www.RepublikaOnline.com

http://www.bca.co.id/id/individu/sarana/Kurs-dan-Suku-Bunga/Suku-Bunga-Simpanan

http://www.syariahmandiri.co.id/id/simulasi

Downloads

Published

2016-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles