MARKET POWER AND EFFICIENCY OF ISLAMIC BANKING AND CONVENTIONAL BANKING IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2018.062-05Keywords:
market structure, efficiency, profitability, efficiency structureAbstract
ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) of banking industry requires both Islamic and conventional banking to improve their efficiency because the competition in banking market industry will be more intense. Therefore, this study aims to identify the type of hyphotesis of industrial organization which exists in Islamic and conventional banks in order to investigate their readiness for AEC. The research sampling consists of 10 Islamic banks and 10 conventional banks from January 2009 to December 2016. To measure x-efficiency and scale efficiency, this research uses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Meanwhile, the concentration is measured by Lerner index. The hypothesis is tested by using panel regression. The result shows SCP (Structure-Conduct-Performance) hypothesis is closely applied to Islamic and conventional banks because market concentration significantly influences profitability. RMP (Relative Market Power) hypothesis is also closely applied to Islamic and conventional banking, this indicates Indonesian banking has market power in determining prices and this condition makes the profit higher. RES (Relative Efficiency Structure) and SES (Scale Efficiency Structure) hypothesis do not exist in both conventional and Islamic banks because x-efficiency and scale efficiency do not affect profitability, concentration, and market share simultaneously. Market power and efficiency researches are commonly conducted in conventional banking, however there are only a few research in Islamic banking area. The novelty of this study is the comparison between conventional and Islamic banking in the term of market structure and efficiency.
Downloads
Abstract viewed: 1173 times
|
PDF downloaded = 725 times
References
Alhabri, A. (2016). Performance of Conventional and Islamic Bank. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: Finance, Vol. 16 Issue 1
Bashir, A. H. M. (2003). Determinants of Profitability in Islamic Banks: Some Evidnece From The Middle East. Islamic Economic Studies, 11(1), 32-57.
Bektas, E. (2006). Test of market structure and profitability in liberalizing the deposit market: the case of North Cyprus. Problems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp 62-67
Berger, A. (1995). The profit-structure relationship in banking—tests of market-power and efficient structure hypotheses. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 27(2):404–431
Berger, A., & Hannan, T. (1989). The Price-Concentration Relationship in Banking. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 291-299. Bikker, J. A. (2002). Competition, Concentration, and Their Relationship: An Empirical at The Banking Industry. Journal of Banking and Finance. 26(11) 2002.
Bordelau, E., and Graham, C. (2010). The Impact of Liquidity on Bank Profitability. Working Paper, Bank of Canada, 2010-38
Chan, S. G., Koh E. H., & Zainir F. (2014). Market structure, institutional framework,and bank efficiency in ASEAN 5. Journal of Economics and Business. 82 pp 84-112.
Charnes, A., Cooper. W., &Rhodes. E. (1978) . Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2(6):429–444
Chortareas, G. E., Garza-García, J. G,& Girardone, C. (2011) Banking Sector Performance in Latin America: Market Power versus Efficiency.Review of Development Economics. 15 (2). pp. 307-325
Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 1–9.
Gajurel. D. P., & Pradhan R. S. (2010). Structure-Performance Relation in Nepalase Banking Industry. IPDER. (2) 25-31
Hagel III, Jo. Brown, J. S., & Davison L. (2010) The Best Way to Measure Company Performance. Harvard Business Review
Jian, L. & Jing Z., (2008). An Empirical Research on the Relationship among Market Structure, Efficiency, and Performance of Chinese Banking Industry. Retrieved March 9 2015. http://www.seiofbluemountain.com/upload/product/201002/1265702453aai4xl0q.pdf
Katib, M. N. (2004) Market Structure and Performance in The Malaysian Banking Industry: A robust estimation.8th Capital Market Conference. Indian Institute of Capital Market Paper.
Lesáková, L. (2007). Uses and Limitations of Profitability Ratio Analysis in Managerial Practice. 5th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking. June 1-2, 200. Budapest, Hungary
Lim, C. 2015. Confidence Preserved. The Asian Banker.
Maudos, J., & Guevara, F. J. (2004). Factors explaining the interest margin in thebanking sectors of the European Union. Journal of Banking and Finance. 28, 2259–2281.
Mirzaei, A. (2012). The Effect of Market Power on Stability and Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks. Islamic Economic Studies, 18 (1 & 2), 45-81
Muljawan, D., Hafidz J., Astuti R. I., & Oktapiani R. (2014). Faktor-faktor Penentu Efisiensi Perbankan Indonesia Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Perhitungan Suku Bunga Kredit. Working Papar of Bank Indonesia 2.
Shepherd, W.G., 1986. Tobin’s q and the structure–performance relationship:comment. American Economic Review. 76, 1205–1210.
Smirlock, M. (1985). Evidence on the (Non) Relationship between Concentration and Profitability in Banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(1), 69-83. doi:10.2307/1992507
Sufian. F., & Habibullah. M. S. (2010). Development in the efficiency of the Thailand banking sector of DEA approach. International Journal of Development Issues. 9 (3). Pp 226-245
Sufian F. & Majid M. A. (2007). Singapore banking efficiency and its relation to stock returns: a DEA window analysis approach. International Journal of Business Studies. 15 (1): 83-106
Van Hoose, D. (2010). The industrial organization of banking: Bank behavior, market structure, and regulation. Berlin: Springer.
Vong P.I., and Chan, H. S. (2006). Determinants of Bank Profitability in Macao. The 30th Anniversary of Journal of Banking and Finance Conference, Beijing.
Wanke, P., Kalam A. M. A., Pestana, B. C., and Kabir, H. M. (2016). Predicting efficiency in Islamic banks: An integrated multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 126-141.
Wong, J., Fong T., & Wong E., (2007). Determinants of the performance of banks in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Monetary Authority Quarterly Bulletin. September 2007.
Ye, Q., Xu Z., & Fang D. (2012). Market structure, performance, and efficiency of Chinese banking sector. Econ Change Restruct. 45:337–358
Yeh. Q. (1996). The application of Data Envelopment Analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. Journal of Operational Research Society. 47 pp 980-988.
Yu, P. Neus W. (2005). Market structure, scale efficiency, and risk as determinants of German banking profitability. Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge. 294.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
