Online Loan Application against Islamic Sharia from the Informatics Aspect

Authors

  • Aulia Faqih Rifai Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Agung Fatwanto Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2022.102-04

Keywords:

Fintech, Informatics, Social, Islam, Online Loan Application, Sharia , Illegal Loan Application

Abstract

In discussing social and organizational change, religion is one important aspect that is often overlooked despite its significant role in social life and society. Religion influences culture, customs, behavior, and communication. Several studies on the use of information technology based on religion have been carried out with a case study approach in areas such as education, economics, and health. However, none of them have incorporated the religious aspect in the application design. One of the information technology and economic products that is closely related to everyday life is online loan applications. Many studies have been conducted on online loan applications in terms of law, economics, and psychology, but they have not explored Islamic Sharia-based on informatics aspects. As the main foundation for online loan applications, informatics should be the basis of studies used to consider making regulations for both general and Islamic Sharia. This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of Islamic Sharia values in online loan applications related to the informatics aspect. Based on the laws of OJK (Financial Services Authority) and the fatwas of MUI (Majelis Ulema Council) regarding online loan applications, it has been found that applications legally registered with the OJK have complied with Islamic Sharia as stipulated by the MUI. However, in illegal online loan applications, many detrimental problems are found that do not comply with Islamic Sharia. Therefore, it is deemed necessary to take action in the form of regulations, social education, and support for religious knowledge to address these online loan issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract viewed: 344 times | PDF downloaded = 252 times

References

Abdul-Gader, A., & Al-Buraey, M. A. (1998). An Islamic perspective on managing information technology: Toward a global understanding. Islamic Studies, 37(1), 57–76.

Allen, J. M., Clem, K.E., Elleven, R. K., Andrews, C. G., & Cagle, L. S. (2004). Copyright and fair use: An issue of ethics in a changing learning environment. The Texas Journal of Distance Learning, 1(2), 1-8.

Anwar, A. F., Riyanti, N., & Alim, Z. (2020). Pinjaman online dalam perspektif fikih muamalah dan analisis terhadap Fatwa DSN-MUI NO. 117/DSN-MUI/IX/2018. Tazkiya, 21(2), 119-136.

BBC News Indonesia. (2018, November 9). Pinjaman online dan penyebaran data nasabah: Aksi ‘rentenir digital’. BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/trensosial-46107193

BBC News Indonesia. (2021, Oktober 26). Pinjol ilegal bermunculan akibat lemahnya sistem hingga perilaku masyarakat konsumtif sehingga terjerat 'lintah digital'. BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-58850599

Boell, S., & Cecez-Kecmanov, D. (2012). Conceptualizing information systems: From “Input-Processing-Output” devices to sociomaterial apparatuses. European Conference on Information Systems 2012 (ECIS 2012), Barcelona.

Carpenter, A. (2020, August 10). The ethics of data collection. Medium. https://towardsdatascience.com/the-ethics-of-data-collection-9573dc0ae240

Dalam Islam. (2018, November 15). Hukum copyright dalam Islam dan dalilnya. Dalam Islam. https://dalamislam.com/hukum-islam/hukum-copyright-dalam-islam

Fichman, P., & Rosenbaum, H. (2014). Social informatics: Past, present and future. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Johnstone, R. L. (2007). Religion in society: A sociology of religion (8th ed). Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Kahfi, A. S. (2006). Informasi dalam perspektif Islam. MediaTor, 7(56), 321-328.

Luger, E., Moran, S., & Rodden, T. (2013). Consent for all: Revealing the hidden complexity of terms and conditions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2687–2696. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481371

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Nobel, D. F. (1997). The Religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention. Penguin Books.

Nurmantari, N. N. A. D., & Martana, N. A. (2019). Perlindungan hukum terhadap data pribadi peminjam dalam layanan aplikasi pinjaman online. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(12), 1–14.

OJK. (2021, December 25). Bahaya fintech P2PL ilegal. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/direktori/fintech/Documents/P2PL%20legal%20vs%20ilegal.pdf

Pardosi, R. O. A. G., & Primawardani, Y. (2020). Perlindungan hak pengguna layanan pinjaman online dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Jurnal HAM, 11(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.353-368

Richardson, M., Cannon, S., Teichert, L., Vance, A., Kramer, I., Barter, M., King, J., & Callahan, C. (2020). Religion-focused dating apps: A Q methodology study on the uses of mutual. Telematics and Informatics, 55, 101448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101448

Rifai, M. N. (2020). Konsep fintech lending dalam perspektif maqāṣid syarī’ah. Islamic Economics Journal, 6(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.21111/iej.v6i1.4591

Rohmah, S., & Ary, M. (2021). Analisis pengalaman pengguna aplikasi pinjaman online menggunakan metode usability testing dan user experience questionnaire (Studi kasus pada Akulaku dan Kredivo Indonesia). JSI: Jurnal Sistem Informasi (E-Journal), 13(1). https://doi.org/10.36706/jsi.v13i1.15085

Sari, M. W., & Novrianto, A. (2020). Analyzing several factors that influence people to make loans online. Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 4(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v4i2.2492

Setiawan, W., Qurrohman, T., & Kurniawan, F. (2019). E-learning application as a Islamic mentoring on learning system of informatics engineering students. Letters in Information Technology Education, 2(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.17977/um010v2i22019p032

Simon, Clear, A., Carter, J., Cross, G., Radenski, A., Tudor, L., & Tõnisson, E. (2015). What’s in a name? International interpretations of computing education terminology. Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858803

Smutny, Z., & Vehovar, V. (2020). Social informatics research: Schools of thought, methodological basis, and thematic conceptualization. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71, 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24280

Soediro, S. (2018). Prinsip keamanan, privasi, dan etika dalam undang-undang informasi dan transaksi elektronik dalam perspektif hukum Islam. Kosmik Hukum, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v18i2.3439

Steinfeld, N. (2016). “I agree to the terms and conditions”: (How) do users read privacy policies online? An eye-tracking experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.038

Sugangga, R., & Sentoso, E. H. (2020). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pengguna pinjaman online (Pinjol) ilegal. Pakuan Justice Journal of Law, 1(1), 47–61.

The University of Edinburgh. (n.d.). What is informatics. https://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/what20is20informatics.pdf

Wahyuni, R. A. E., & Turisno, B. E. (2019). Praktik finansial teknologi ilegal dalam bentuk pinjaman online ditinjau dari etika bisnis. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.379-391

Downloads

Published

2023-04-10

Issue

Section

Articles