The Play Interaction Programme sebagai Strategi Penguatan School Connectedness pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v11i1.3016Keywords:
School Connectedness, Siswa Sekolah Dasar, The Play Interaction ProgrammeAbstract
This research is motivated by the tendency of elementary school students to be reluctant to attend school, avoid academic tasks, and express unhappiness in the school environment. This indicates that students have low school connectedness. Considering the importance of school connectedness in students, this research aims to address the issue of low school connectedness by providing the Play Interaction Program intervention to elementary school students with low school connectedness. The purpose of this study is to overcome the problem of low school connectedness in elementary school students. The hypothesis in this research is that the Play Interaction Program is effective in improving the school connectedness of elementary school students. This research uses a quantitative approach with the experimental research type of one group pre-post-test design. The subjects in this study are 16 students identified as having low school connectedness. The results of the Wilcoxon test show that the Play Interaction Program is effective in improving the school connectedness of elementary school students. School connectedness in students significantly increased after the Play Interaction Program intervention. This research provides an alternative in improving school connectedness by using joyful learning strategies in the teaching and learning process, ensuring that the school connectedness of elementary school students is maintained.
Penelitian ini dilatari oleh adanya kecenderungan siswa sekolah dasar yang enggan bersekolah, menghindari tugas-tugas akademik dan menunjukkan perasaan tidak bahagia berada di sekolah. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa siswa memiliki school connectedness yang rendah. Mengingat pentingnya school connectedness pada siswa, maka penelitian ini berupaya memecahkan permasalahan school connectedness dengan memberikan intervensi the play interaction programme pada siswa sekolah dasar yang memiliki school connectedness yang rendah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengatasi permasalahan school connectedness yang rendah pada siswa sekolah dasar. Hipotesis dalam penelitian ini, yaitu the play interaction programme efektif dalam meningkatkan school connectedness siswa sekolah dasar. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan tipe penelitian eksperimental one group pre-post test design. Subjek dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 16 orang siswa yang teridentifikasi memiliki school connectedness yang rendah. Hasil uji wilcoxon menunjukkan bahwa the play interaction programme efektif dalam meningkatkan school connectedness siswa sekolah dasar. School connectedness pada siswa mengalami peningkatan secara signifikan setelah diberikan intervensi the play interaction programme. Penelitian ini memberikan alternatif dalam meningkatkan school connectedness yaitu dengan menggunakan strategi joyfull learning dalam proses belajar mengajar sehingga school connectedness siswa sekolah dasar tetap terjaga.
Downloads
References
Blum R., & Libbey, H. P. (2004). Wingspread declaration on school connections. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 231-234.
Erford, B. T. (2016). 40 teknik yang harus diketahui setiap konselor. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Latipun. (2015). Psikologi konseling. Cetakan ke-9. Edisi ke-4. Malang: UMM Press.
Lester, L., Waters, S., & Cross, D. (2013). The relationship between school connectedness and mental health during the transition to secondary school: A path analysis. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 23(2), 157-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2013.20
Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 274-283.
Marsh, R. J. (2018). Building school connectedness for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Intervention in School and Clinic, 00(0), 1-8. DOI: 10.1177/1053451218765219.
Marraccini, M. E., & Brier, Z. M. F. (2017). School connectedness and suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A systematic meta-analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000192
Matthys, W. & Lochman, J. E. (2010). Oppositional Defiant disorder and conduct disorder in childhood. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd Publication
Niehaus, K., Rudasill, K. M., Rakes, C. E. (2012). A longitudinal study of school connectedness and academic outcomes across sixth grade. Journal of School Psychology, 50(4), 443-460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.03.002
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 47 Tahun 2008 Tentang Wajib Belajar.
Prinz, R. J., & Jones, T. L. (2003). Family-based intervention. Cecilia A. Essau (Ed.). Conduct and oppositional defiant disorders: Epidemiology, risk factor, & treatment. (pp 279-298). London: Lawrence Publisher.
Rawatlal, K., & Petersen, I. (2012). Factors impeding school connectedness: A case study. South African Journal of Psychology, 42(3), 346-357. DOI:10.1177/008124631204200306
Ridha, A. A. (2022). Peran dukungan sosial keluarga dan kemandirian belajar terhadap flourishing pada mahasiswa yang terancam drop out. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 10(2), 224-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v10i2.2615
Rudasill, K. M., Niehaus, K., Crockett, L. J., & Rakes, C. R. (2014). Changes in school connectedness and deviant peer affiliation among sixth-grade students from high-poverty neighborhoods. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(7), 896-922. DOI: 10.1177/0272431613511330.
Sharma, J., Kay, J., Johnson, S., & Smith, R. (2015). Successful approaches to selective mutism in school and community settings. Benita Rae Smith and Alice Sluckin (Eds.). Tackling selective mutism: A guide for professionals and parents. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Shochet, I. M., Dadds, M. R., Ham, D., & Montague, R. (2006). School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35(2), 170-179. DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_1
Svavarsdottir, E. K. (2008). Connectedness, belonging and feelings about school among healthy and chronically ill Icelandic schoolchildren. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 22(3), 463-471. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00553.x.
Taghvayi, D., Vaziri, S., & Kashani, F. L. (2012). The Effectiveness of Integrative Approach, Fernald Multi-Sensory Technique on Decrease Reading Disability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1264-1269. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.060
Waters, S., Cross, D., & Shaw, T. (2010). Does the nature of schools matter? An exploration of selected school ecology factors on adolescent perceptions of school connectedness. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 381-402. DOI: 10.1348/000709909x484479.
Whitlock, J. L. (2006). Youth perceptions of life at school: contextual correlates of school connectedness in adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 10(1), 13-29. DOI: 10.1207/s1532480xads1001_2.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Psikologi Integratif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).