Productivity Analysis in the Production Process Using the Six Sigma Method (Case Study at the XSMK Company)

Authors

  • Elanjati Worldailmi Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/jiehis.3783

Keywords:

waste, six sigma, DPMO, reject

Abstract

XSMK company is a company engaged in the furniture sector that produces various kinds of shelving products in Indonesia. There are problems that hinder the productivity of the company, namely waste in the production process. Six Sigma is an organized and systematic method for process improvement strategy and new product development that relies on statistical methods and scientific methods to create reductions in product defect rates. With the Six Sigma method, the company implements a vision of quality improvement towards the target of 3.4 failures per million opportunities DPMO (Defects Per Million Opportunities). For this reason, a study was conducted which aimed to determine the value of six sigma, the causes of product rejects, as well as suggestions for improvements to the company. From the results of data processing, the company has an average sigma level of 4,336 with a possible damage of 5,867.5 units for one million productions. There are 4 out of 11 processes that cause rejected products, namely Pond, Bending Plate, Spot, Welding. The main cause of Reject is plate Bending with the percentage of total Reject being 48.077%. From the problems that occur, actions can be taken to minimize Reject products in the production process at the company in the form of making improvements to the Pond Process, Plate Bending Process, Spot Process, Welding Process, Machines, Workers, Raw Materials, and Systems that exist in the company.

References

Assauri, S. (1998). Manajemen Operasi dan Produksi. Jakarta: LPFE UI

Behara, R.S. (1995). Customer Satisfaction Measurement and Analysis Using Six Sigma. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 12, No.3, page 9- 18.

Eshan S.J. (2012). A Case Study on Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Volume 3, Issue 6 (Nov-Dec. 2012), PP 27-35

Six Sigma Untuk Organisasi Bisnis dan Pemeritah. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Heizer, Jay and Render, B. (2006). Manajemen Operasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kunal Ganguly. (2012). Improvement Process for Rolling Millthrough the DMAC Six Sigma Approach. International Journal for Quality Research.

Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large Scale Production. Cambridge: Productivity Press.

Pande, Pete and Larry Holpp. (2002). What is Six Sigma. United States of America: McGraw- Hill

Pande, Peter. S., Robert P., Neuman & Roland R. Cavanagh. (2002). The Six Sigma Way. Andi, Yogyakarta.

Reksohadiprojo, Sukanto., Gitosudarmo, Indriyo. (2000). Manajemen Produksi. BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Susetyo J, Winami dan Hartanto C. (2011). Aplikasi Six Sigma dan Kaizen Sebagai Metode Pengendalian Dan Perbaikan Kualitas Produk. Jurnal Teknologi, Volume 4 Nomor I, Juni 2011, 61-53.

Young H., and Frank T. (2006). Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach. Technovation, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 26, No.4, pp. 708–715.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-04

How to Cite

Worldailmi, E. (2023). Productivity Analysis in the Production Process Using the Six Sigma Method (Case Study at the XSMK Company). Journal of Industrial Engineering and Halal Industries, 3(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.14421/jiehis.3783