Indikator Penerapan Ham Universal Dan Ham Partikular Dalam Putusan Mk No 46/Puu-Viii/2010 Tentang Anak Di Luar Perkawinan Dan Putusan Mk No 8/Puu-Xii/2014 Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama

Authors

  • Hanif Millata Ibrahim Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v7i1.2032

Abstract

This research presents there are at least, three differences due to Human Rights
implemention in this two verdicts; the lawsuit object and the interpretation model of
Constitution and constitutional courts tends to apply contextual understanding in the order of MK No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 and tends to apply textual understanding in the order of MK MK No. 8/PUU-XII/2014. While there are 5 indicators of
Human Rights implementation. First, the interpretation of constitution should give a maximum protection to minorities. Second, it must accomodate a relevant international covenant and it’s not yet regulated in legislation. Third, it must protect it constitutional rights of civilian. Fourth, to recover the violated constitutional rights. Fifth, it should be formed by technology developments, economic aspect, global socio-cultural that is not contradicted to fundamental principles of Pancasila.

Author Biography

  • Hanif Millata Ibrahim, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga
    SUPREMASI HUKUM merupakan jurnal ilmiah dan media komunikasi ilmiah antar peminat ilmu hukum.

References

Asshidqie, Jimly, Pengantar Ilmu Tata Negara Jilid I, Jakarta: Sekretariat

Jenderal dan Kepanitiaan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006.

Baderin, Mashood A., Hukum Internasional Hak AsasiManusia & Hukum

Islam, Jakarta: Komisi Nasional HakAsasiManusia, 2010.

Buck, Christopher G., “Judicial Activism” dalam Gary L. Anderson dan

Kathryn G. Herr, editor, Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice,

California: SAGE Publication, 2007.

El-Muhtaj, Majda, Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konstitusi Indonesia, (Jakarta:

Prenada Media,2005.

Gautama, Udargo, Pengertian Tentang Negara Hukum, Bandung: Alumni,

Huda, Ni’matul, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali Press,

Howard,E, HAM: Penjajahan Dalih Relativisme Budaya, Jakarta: PT Pustaka

Utama Budaya, 2000.

Martitah, Mahkamah Konstitusi dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature,

Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2013.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Sosiologi Hukum Asai-Esai Terpilih, Yogyakarta: Genta

Publishing, 2010.

Rhona K.M. Smith, dkk, Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, Yogyakarta:

PUSHAM UII, 2008.

Siahaan, Maruarar, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia,

Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011.

Syarifudin, Amir, Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana

Prenadamedia, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-28

How to Cite

Indikator Penerapan Ham Universal Dan Ham Partikular Dalam Putusan Mk No 46/Puu-Viii/2010 Tentang Anak Di Luar Perkawinan Dan Putusan Mk No 8/Puu-Xii/2014 Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama. (2018). Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v7i1.2032