Perlidungan Hukum bagi Nasabah BMT (Baitul Maal wat Tamwil) Melalui Pembentukan LPS (Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v11i2.2706Keywords:
BMT, Legal Protection, Explicit Deposit Protection.Abstract
The presence of BMTs as MFIs in Indonesia has colored economic growth as supporting funding for the small and medium enterprise sector. The status of BMT legal entities in Indonesia is the majority as cooperative legal entities, but there are also those that are PT legal entities, foundations, and not yet legal entities, in customer protection. There are two protection models, namely implicit deposit protection and explicit deposit protection. The implicit protection model is carried out through supervision of banks, while explicit supervision is carried out by the deposit insurance agency. Until now, the existence of LPS for BMT has not been known, although in Article 19 of Law no. 1 of 2013 stipulates that MFIs can also establish deposit insurance institutions (LPS). This research is a normative legal research that refers to various sources of primary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The conclusion of this paper is, Legal protection for BMT customers is contained in Article 54 of Law no. 25 of 1992 regarding settlements in conditions where cooperatives experience dissolution. In addition to Law no. 1 of 2013 legal protection for customers is regulated in Article 24 and Article 25, and complaint services are regulated in Article 26. However, legal problems for BMTs are not only in explicit customer protection but in the form of BMT itself there is no regulation that stipulates that BMTs must what kind of legal entity? The government should have issued special rules for BMTs considering that BMTs are in principle different from cooperatives. BMT carries out two functions, namely collecting ZIS and running business in the micro sector.References
Danaparamita, Bella Bretyaning. “Penjaminan Dana Nasabah Bank oleh Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan.” Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan 3, no. 2 (20 April 2020): 41–61. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v3i2.2189.
Dewi, Nourma. “Regulasi Keberadaan Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil (BMT) dalam Sistem Perekonomian di Indonesia.” Jurnal Serambi Hukum 11, no. 01 (2017): 96–110.
Djuwaini, Dimyaudin. Pengantar Fiqh Muamalah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008.
Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 2011.
Hamid, Lutfi. Jejak-Jejak Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: Senayan Abadi Publishing, 2003.
Hermansyah. Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.
Huda, Nurul, dan Mohamad Heykal. Lembaga Keuangan Islam: Tinjauan Teoretis dan Praktis. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.
Irma. T, Ramadhani. “Tinjauan Teoritis Dan Yuridis Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan.” ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan 10, no. 2 (2019): 233–46. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v10i2.5157.
Julyano, Mario, dan Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Crepido 1, no. 1 (2019): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22.
Kansil, C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1989.
Lathif, AH. Azharudin, dan Nahrowi. Pengantar Hukum Bisnis: Pendekatan Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press, 2013.
Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan. “Hadirnya LPS di Indonesia.” Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan. Diakses 10 Juli 2022. https://lps.go.id/sejarah.
Ma’shum, Syafi’atul Mir’ah. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil (BMT) yang Dilikuidasi di Indonesia.” Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum 5, no. 1 (1 Juni 2017): 151–67. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v5i1.1396.
Murdiana, Elfa. “Menggagas Payung Hukum Baitul Maal Wattanwil (BMT) Sebagai Koperasi Syari’ah dalam Bingkai Ius Constituendum.” Jurnal Penelitian 10, no. 2 (29 Desember 2016): 271–94. https://doi.org/10.21043/jupe.v10i2.1816.
Mursid, Fadillah. “Kebijakan Regulasi Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil (BMT) di Indonesia.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah dan Masyarakat 18, no. 2 (2018): 9–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v18i2.2486.
Ngiu, Sutrisno Fernando. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Bank Sebagai Subjek Hukum Menurut Undang–Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan.” Lex Privatum 3, no. 1 (2015): 241–50.
Priyadi, Unggul, dan Sutardi. Teori dan Aplikasi Lembaga Keuangan Mikro Syariah. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2018.
Raharjo, M. Dawan. Islam dan Transformasi Sosial-Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1999.
Rusiana, Dita Angga. “Maruf Amin Usul Ada Lembaga Pengawas dan Penjamin Simpanan Koperasi BMT.” SINDOnews.com. Diakses 9 Juli 2022. https://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/233706/178/maruf-amin-usul-ada-lembaga-pengawas-dan-penjamin-simpanan-koperasi-bmt-1605503474.
Saiful Abib, Agus, B. Heryanti, dan Dhian Astanti. “Konsep Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan pada Koperasi Indonesia.” Arena Hukum 13, no. 3 (31 Desember 2020): 460–78. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01303.4.
Sidharta. Reformasi Peradilan dan Tanggung Jawab Negara, Bunga Rampai Komisi Yudisial, Putusan Hakim: Antara Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum, dan Kemanfaatan. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2010.
Soemitra, Andri. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2009.
Sutedi, Adrian. Aspek Hukum Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2004 tentang Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 tentang Lembaga Keuangan Mikro.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Kemudahan, Pelindungan, dan Pemberdayaan Koperasi dan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah.
