Judicial Inconsistency and the Rule of Law: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision on Presidential Age Requirements in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/ad8p7x10Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Judicial Inconsistency, Rule Of Law, Judicial Ethics, Constitutional Legitimacy, Presidential Age RequirementsAbstract
The Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) of Indonesia plays a pivotal role as the guardian of the Constitution and the protector of constitutional rights. However, the Court’s ruling in Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the age requirements for presidential and vice-presidential candidates has sparked public controversy due to its inconsistency with previous judgments on identical legal provisions. This study critically examines the inconsistency of the Constitutional Court’s reasoning and evaluates the decision’s conformity with the principles of the rule of law and judicial independence. Using a normative juridical method supported by a statute and case approach, the research analyzes primary legal materials, including Constitutional Court decisions, relevant legislation, and judicial ethics regulations. The findings reveal that Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 deviates from the Court’s prior stance, effectively creating a new legal norm beyond its constitutional mandate, thus blurring the boundaries between judicial review and legislative authority. Furthermore, the proven ethical violations by the Chief Justice have weakened public trust in the integrity of constitutional adjudication. This article argues that such inconsistency undermines the predictability and legitimacy of the Court’s jurisprudence, which are essential to the rule of law. The study contributes to the broader discourse on judicial accountability by emphasizing the need for a coherent interpretive framework and stronger ethical oversight mechanisms to preserve the integrity of Indonesia’s constitutional justice system.
References
Andini, Orin Gusta, Nilasari Nilasari, and Andreas Avelino Eurian. “Restorative justice in Indonesia corruption crime: a utopia.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31, no. 1 (April 2023): 72–90. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.24247.
Angel Lina, Angie, and Alan Bayu Aji. “The Legal Consequences of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 on the Democratic System in Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum In Concreto 3, no. 1 (February 2024): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.35960/inconcreto.v3i1.1314.
Astawa, I Gde Pantja, and Firdaus Arifin. Disputes over the Authority of State Institutions in the Constitutional Court. 1st ed. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2021.
Auliadi, Mohammad Iqbal Alif, Omy Fajar Reza Pradana, Laila Intansari, and Samsul Arifin. “The Consequences of Violations of the Constitutional Court Judges’ Code of Ethics on the Enforcement of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023.” Sosio Yustisia: Journal of Law and Social Change 4, no. 1 (May 2024): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15642/sosyus.v4i1.544.
Butt, Simon. “Constitutional Court Decisions on the Judicial Independence of Other Indonesian Courts.” Constitutional Review 9, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev922.
Castillo-Ortiz, Pablo. “The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the Case for a New Design of Kelsenian Institutions.” Law and Philosoph 39 (2020): 617–655. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-020-09378-3.
Chakim, M Lutfi. “Organizational Improvement of the Indonesian Constitutional Court: Reflections on Appointment, Supervision, and Dismissal of Justices.” International Journal for Court Administration 12, no. 1 (2021): 1. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.308.
Fajrianto, Andriyansyah, and Zamzami. “Concrete Review: Comparison of Austria, Germany, and Croatia and the Ideal Formulation of Regulations in Indonesia.” DINAMIKA 30, no. 1 (2024). https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jdh/article/view/23413.
Fernanda, Diah Ayu, Achmad Arbi’ Nur Badrotin Jabbar, Saifullah Yudha Noorman Rachmaddany, and Ajeng Ayu Maghfiroh. “The Effectiveness of Constitutional Supervision Judges by the Constitutional Court Honorary Council.” Reformasi Hukum 28, no. 1 (April 2024): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v28i1.899.
Fithra, Noora Nuzulal, and Trianah Sofiani. “Inconsistency in the Norms Determining the Terms of Office of the Chief Justice and Deputy Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court.” Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law 03, no. 02 (2023): 203–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v1i01.35.
Heryansyah, Despan. “The Urgency of Expanding the Authority of the Judicial Commission in Overseeing Constitutional Court Judges.” Staatsrecht: Journal of Constitutional Law and Islamic Politics 1, no. 2 (2022): 158–69. https://doi.org/10.14421/staatsrecht.v1i2.2472.
Holoubek, Michael, and Ulrich Wagrandl. “A Model for the World: The Austrian Constitutional Court Turns 100.” ICL Journal 17, no. 3 (2023): 251–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2023-0029.
Lailam, Tanto. “A Comparison of Constitutional Review Designs in the German and Indonesian Federal Constitutional Courts.” Arena Hukum 16, no. 02 (August 2023): 274–301. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01602.4.
Litman, Leah, and Katherine Shaw. “Textualism, Judicial Supremacy, and the Independent State Legislature Theory.” Wisconsin Law Review, no. 5 (2022). https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/2718.
Mustofa, Wildan Sayuthi. Code of Ethics for Judges. 2nd Edition. Jakarta: KENCANA Prenadamedia Group, 2013.
Nasir, Cholidin. “Judicial Review in the United States, Germany, and Indonesia.” Progressive Law Journal Vol. 8, no. 1 (2020): 67–80. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.8.1.67-80.
Nasution, Siti Hasanah, Imran, and Firzhal Arzhi. “The Nature of Judicial Independence in the Constitutional System of the Republic of Indonesia.” Kertha Semaya Journal 11, no. 6 (2023): 1277–96. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i06.p05.
Palguna, I Gede Dewa. Constitutional Complaint: Legal Action Against Violations of Citizens' Constitutional Rights. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Pane, Orin Sabrina, and Ida Bagus Mahayoga Raharja. “Ultra Petita Decision of the Constitutional Court Regarding Judicial Review of the Requirements for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidacy (Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023).” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 21, no. 1 (July 2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v21i1.1376.
Putra, Antoni. “The Final and Binding Nature of Constitutional Court Decisions in the Review of Laws.” Judicial Journal 14, no. 3 (2021): 291–311. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i3.425.
Rasji, Rasji, Dhiny Ellen Juwita, Nathania Apriza, and Baharuddin Jusuf Habibie Hasta. “Analysis of Violations of the Code of Ethics for Constitutional Court Judges in Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 According to the Constitutional Court Law.” JALAKOTEK: Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology 1, no. 2 (2024): 417–22. https://doi.org/10.57235/jalakotek.v1i2.2423.
Sari, Dian Permata, Atikah Ramadhani, Sabrina Birri Sintia, Malikah Alya Az-Zahra, and Komang Windasari. “Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023: The Issue of Political Dynasties Related to Age Limits for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates in the 2024 Presidential Election.” Research Student Scientific Journal Vol. 2, No. 1 March 2025 Vol. 2, no. 1 (2025): 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v2i1.3570.
Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. “Open Legal Policy in Constitutional Court Decisions and Lawmaking.” Constitutional Journal 16, no. 3 (2019): 559–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636.
Siahaan, Maruarar. Procedural Law of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. . Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Sirait, Theresa Yolanda, Bintang M E Naibaho, Janpatar Simamora, and Leonardo David Simatupang. “Inconsistencies in Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding the Existence of the Corruption Eradication Commission as an Independent State Institution.” NJLO: Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion 01, no. 1 (2020): 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v1i01.35.
Subandri, Rio. “A Judicial Review of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 on Age Requirements for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates.” Jaksa: Journal of Legal and Political Studies 2, no. 1 (2024): 135–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v2i1.1512.
Umam, Muhammad Khoirul. “Legal Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU/XXI/2023 on the Age Limit for Vice Presidential Candidates in Indonesia.” Law, Development and Justice Review 8, no. 3 (September 2025): 236–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v2i1.1512.
Wijaya, Rangga. “The Function of the Constitutional Court in Reviewing Laws Against the 1945 Constitution.” IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research 1, no. 1 (2023): 23–27. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v1i1.5
Wiratraman, Herlambang P. “Constitutional Struggles and the Court in Indonesia’s Turn to Authoritarian Politics.” Federal Law Review 50, no. 3 (2025): 314–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X221107404.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Naafiatul Mukarromah, Fachri Hamzah Pangestu, Udiyo Basuki, Muhammad Fahrul Hudallah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
