Integrating Spinoza’s Philosophy of Civil Law into Indonesian Judicial Reasoning: Toward a Justice-Oriented Legal Framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14421/c4016524

Keywords:

Spinoza, Civil Law, Justice, Judge's Decision, Indonesian Legal System

Abstract

Previous studies on Spinoza have generally focused on his political and theological philosophy, while the application of his concept of civil law in judicial decision-making practice has been rarely discussed, creating a research gap in the context of its application to modern legal systems. This research aims to integrate Spinoza's philosophy of civil law—rooted in rationality, equality, and moral order—into the framework of judicial consideration in Indonesia, where the balance between positive law and justice remains challenging. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this research examines relevant legal provisions and comparative practices from democratic countries such as the United States, France, Germany, India, and New Zealand, as well as the philosophical foundations of Spinoza's thinking on civil law and justice. The research findings indicate that Spinoza's view of law as a rational agreement based on moral necessity aligns with the principles of freedom, equality, and human dignity in the Indonesian Constitution. Integrating this idea into legal considerations can guide judges to move beyond formalistic interpretations towards justice oriented towards morality and humanity. Theoretically, this research contributes by offering a philosophical framework for rational legal reasoning, while practically providing a model for balancing legal certainty with moral justice in judicial practice and law enforcement in Indonesia.

References

Aldyan, Arsyad. “The Indonesian State Law System Is Based on The Philosophy of Pancasila and Constitution.” Res Judicata 6, no. 1 (August 4, 2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.29406/rj.v6i1.4939.

Andrew Christison, and Warren Freedman. “The Separation Of Powers And The Non-Delegation Doctrine In Re Constitutionality of the Mpumalanga Petitions Bills, 2000 2000 1 SA 447 (CC); 2001 11 BCLR 1126 (CC).” Obiter 25, no. 1 (July 24, 2023). https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v25i1.16533.

Belaief, Gail. “The Concept of Civil Law in Spinoza.” In Spinoza and Law, 271–91. Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315087757-14.

Cerezo Galán, Pedro. “Democracia versus Absolutismo. Contraste Teológico-Político Entre Baruch de Spinoza y Thomas Hobbes.” Anales de La Cátedra Francisco Suárez 53 (December 7, 2018): 209–42. https://doi.org/10.30827/acfs.v53i0.7780.

Geiringer, Claudia. “When Constitutional Theories Migrate: A Case Study.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 67, no. 2 (July 31, 2019): 281–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz013.

Green, Keith. “Spinoza on Hatred and Power and the Challenge of Reconciliation.” In Conflict and Resolution: The Ethics of Forgiveness, Revenge, and Punishment, 59–81. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77807-1_4.

GS, Mahantesh. “Social and Economic Justice under Constitution of India: A Critical Analysis.” Int’l JL Mgmt. & Human. 2 (2019): 22. http://ijlmh.com/social-and-economic-justice-under-constitution-of-india-a-critical-analysis/.

Harmon, David. “From the Infinite to the Finite and Various: On Motion, Spinoza, and His (Meta) Physics.” The University of St Andrews, 2025. https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/31910.

Hillgruber, Christian. “Human Dignity as a Legal Concept. A Vision of European Culture.” The Legal Culture 2, no. 1 (November 9, 2020). https://doi.org/10.37873/legal.2019.2.1.48.

Hoult, Jason. “The Freedom of Religion Is a Divine Idea.” Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift 98, no. 2 (November 18, 2022): 123–46. https://doi.org/10.51619/stk.v98i2.24620.

James, Susan. “Freedom of Conscience and Civic Peace.” In Spinoza on Learning to Live Together, 154–66. Oxford University PressOxford, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198713074.003.0011.

Jaquet, Chantal. “Critique de l’indignation Désobéissance et Obéissance Absolue Chez Spinoza.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie n° 295, no. 1 (December 14, 2020): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.295.0055.

Kabala, Boleslaw Z., and Thomas Cook. “Hobbes and Spinoza on Sovereign Education.” Philosophies 7, no. 1 (January 8, 2022): 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7010006.

Kistler, André. “Truth and Justice in Spinoza’s Theological–Political Treatise and the Ethics.” Laws 12, no. 3 (April 28, 2023): 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12030039.

Klein, Julie R. “Spinozan (Trans) Formations.” In Transformation and the History of Philosophy, 155–71. London: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003056409-14.

Lavaert, Sonja. “Law and Freedom.” Roczniki Filozoficzne 72, no. 3 (September 27, 2024): 7–34. https://doi.org/10.18290/rf24723.1.

———. “Passive Tolerance versus Political Engagement. Antistius Constans, Koerbagh, Van Den Enden, and Spinoza.” Roczniki Filozoficzne 70, no. 4 (December 30, 2022): 297–317. https://doi.org/10.18290/rf2204.11.

Lord, Beth. Spinoza’s Philosophy of Ratio. Edinburgh University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474420440.

Lotta Maunsbach. “Procedural Aspects on Impartial and Independent Judging-How Can a Court Decide Whether Another Court and Its Judges Are Impartial and Independent?” Giornale Di Storia Costituzionale 2, no. 44 (2022): 131–53. https://www.law.lu.se/lotta-maunsbach/publication/66019d96-08ae-4dd2-9264-18ba88e237d5.

Lucchese, Filippo Del. “Spinoza and Constituent Power.” Contemporary Political Theory 15, no. 2 (May 7, 2016): 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2015.39.

Lucia Dahlbeck, Moa De. “Spinoza, Legal Theory, and Artificial Intelligence: A Conceptual Analysis of Law and Technology.” SN Social Sciences 2, no. 8 (August 9, 2022): 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00458-w.

Milovic, Miroslav. “Ius Sive Potentia: Paul and Spinoza.” Filozofija i Drustvo 31, no. 1 (2020): 84–97. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001084M.

Nadler, Steven. Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815737.

Nasir, Melisa, Elmi Khoiriyah, Bagus Priyono Pamungkas, Inas Hardianti, and Raesitha Zildjianda. “Kedudukan Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan Di Indonesia.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 1 (February 23, 2023): 241–54. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2084.

Oduor, Reginald M. J. “Liberal Democracy: An African Critique.” South African Journal of Philosophy 38, no. 1 (January 2, 2019): 108–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2019.1583882.

Olsthoorn, Johan. “SPINOZA ON HUMAN AND DIVINE JUSTICE.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 33, no. 1 (October 7, 2016): 21–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44076605.

Přibáň, Jiří. “Constitutional Imaginaries and Legitimation: On Potentia, Potestas , and Auctoritas in Societal Constitutionalism.” Journal of Law and Society 45, no. S1 (July 18, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12118.

Quddus, Usman, and Dennis W. K. Khong. “Six Core Values in Natural Law as a Common Concern for Human Development.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (December 31, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2225828.

Rosenthal, Michael A. “Spinoza on the Ontology of Justice: The Role of ‘Beings of Reason’ (Entia Rationis),” 117–35, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23984-7_7.

Santos Campos, Andre. “Spinoza on Justice.” Epoché 21, no. 1 (2016): 127–43. https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche201682968.

Shearmur, Jeremy. Law, Legislation, and Liberty. London: Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320777.

Stewart, Edmund. “Tyranny in Tragedy.” Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought 40, no. 2 (April 25, 2023): 234–58. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340407.

Taylor, Dan. “The Reasonable Republic? Statecraft, Affects, and the Highest Good in Spinoza’s Late Tractatus Politicus.” History of European Ideas 45, no. 5 (July 4, 2019): 645–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2019.1592382.

Visentin, Stefano. “From Security to Peace and Concord.” Theoria 66, no. 159 (July 1, 2019): 71–90. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2019.6615905.

Walther, Manfred. “Natural Law, Civil Law, and International Law in Spinoza.” In Spinoza and Law, 293–301. Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315087757-15.

Yonover, Jason Maurice. “Nietzsche, Spinoza, and Etiology (On the Example of Free Will).” European Journal of Philosophy 29, no. 2 (June 3, 2021): 459–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12597.

Yu, Aurora. “Spinoza’s Invented Laws and the Imagination.” The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2022.

———. “Spinoza on Miracles and Natural Laws.” Belgrade Philosophical Annual 37, no. 2 (2024): 157–79. https://doi.org/10.5937/BPA2402157Y.

Zuckert, Michael. “On the Fourteenth Amendment: A Textual Analysis.” Perspectives on Political Science 48, no. 4 (October 2, 2019): 246–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2019.1630208.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Susilo, E. (2024). Integrating Spinoza’s Philosophy of Civil Law into Indonesian Judicial Reasoning: Toward a Justice-Oriented Legal Framework. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 13(2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.14421/c4016524