REFORMASI AL-QUR’AN DALAM HUKUM PERCERAIAN: Kajian Antropologi Hukum Islam

Ali Sodiqin(1)
(1) Ushul Fikih

Abstract

Islamic law, including divorce law, has a dialectical relationship with
the traditions of Arab society as its first recipient. Therefore, explaining
Islamic law must consider the historical and anthropological situation
Arab’s community in 7th century AD. The social structure, politics,
and economics of Arab society at that time had a strong influence for the
enforcement of Islamic law. Anthropologically, the differences of the rights
and obligations between husband and wife in the law of divorce was
inseparable from the dynamics of a growing cultural community. Islamic
law governs the conduct of divorce as it adjusts to the social conditions
of Arab society at the time. So the divorce legal texts in the Quran must
be explained by the socio-cultural context of the recipient. When the
socio-cultural is change, change of the law of divorce is permissible. The
substance of the law of divorce in Islam is to place the divorced parties
(husband and wife) to be equal, ie, have the same rights and obligations.
The difference in the rights and obligations of husband and wife found
in texts of Islamic law due to the efforts of adoption, adaptation, and
integration of the revelation of the Qur’an with the traditions of Arab
society. In the context of socio-cultural system now, can be a medium
for constructing the divorce laws in Islamic law towards social justice.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Ali, K., A Study of Islamic History, Delhi: Idarah-I Adabiyat-I-Delhi, 1980.

al Mursi, Al Safsafi Ahmad, Qiyam al Usriyyah bain al Asalah wa al-

Mu’asirah, Kairo: Dar al Afaq al ‘Arabiyyah, 2002.

an Naisabury, Abu al Hasan Ali ibn Ahmad al Wahidi, Asbab an Nuzul,

Juz I, Kairo: Muassasah al Halabi, 1968.

al-Qurtuby, Abi Abdillah Muhammad Ibn Ahmad al-Ansary, Al-Ja>mi’ li

Ah}ka>m al-Qur’a>n, Juz III, Beirut: Da>r Ihya> at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1967.

at Tabary, Abi Ja’far Muhammad bin Jarir, Tafsir at Tabary, Juz X, Beirut:

Dar al-Fikr, 1978.

’Audah, Jasser, Maqasid al-Shari’ah as Philosopy of Islamic Law, A Systems

Approach, London:The International Institute of Islamic Thought,

.

Connolly, Peter (ed.), Aneka Pendekatan Studi Agama, terj. Imam Khoiri,

Yogyakarta: LKiS, 1999.

Coulson, Noel J., Hukum Islam dalam Perspektif Sejarah, terj. Hamid Ahmad,

Jakarta: P3M, 1987.

Faqih, Mansour, Epistemologi Syari’ah: Mencari Format Baru Fiqh Indonesia,

Semarang: Walisongo Press, 1994.

Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Culture, Selected Essays, New York:

Basic Books, 1973.

Hitti, Philip K, The History of The Arabs, terj. R. Cecep Lukman Yasin

dkk., Jakarta: Serambi, 2005.

ibn Kathir, Imaduddin Abi al-Fidai Isma’il ad-Damsyiqi, Tafsi>r al-Qur’a>n

al-‘Az}i>m, Juz I, Kairo: Muassasah Qurtubah, 2000.

Karim, Khalil Abdul, Syari’ah,Sejarah Perkelahian Pemaknaan, terj. Kamran

As’ad, Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2003.

Koentjaraningrat, Sejarah Teori Antropologi II, Jakarta: UI Press, 1990.

Lapidus, Ira M., Sejarah Sosial Umat Islam, Bagian Kesatu dan Kedua, terj.

Gufron A. Mas’adi, Jakarta: Raja Grafinfo Persada, 1999.

Roberts, Robert, The Social Law of the Qoran, New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan,

Salim, Abu Malik Kamal bin as-Sayyid, Ensiklopedi Fiqh Wanita, Juz II,

Bogor: Pustaka Ibnu Katsir, 2008.

Schacht, Joseph G, An Introduction to Islamic Law, Oxford University

Press, 1964.

Sodiqin, Ali, Antropologi Al Qur’an, Model Dialektika Wahyu dan

Budaya,Yogyakarta: Arruz Media, 2008.

Tibi, Bassam, Islam and the Cultural Accommodation of Social Change,

translated by Clare Krojzl, Oxford: Westview Press, 1991.

Authors

Ali Sodiqin
ali_sadikin6@yahoo.com (Primary Contact)
REFORMASI AL-QUR’AN DALAM HUKUM PERCERAIAN: Kajian Antropologi Hukum Islam. (2014). Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v2i2.1369

Article Details

How to Cite

REFORMASI AL-QUR’AN DALAM HUKUM PERCERAIAN: Kajian Antropologi Hukum Islam. (2014). Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v2i2.1369